Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 223, Issue 4, pp 389–399 | Cite as

Repeated exposure to MDMA and amphetamine: sensitization, cross-sensitization, and response to dopamine D1- and D2-like agonists

  • Sarah Bradbury
  • David Gittings
  • Susan SchenkEmail author
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Acute exposure to (±) 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) produces hyperlocomotion that is preferentially expressed in the periphery of closed chambers. Following repeated administration, however, a sensitized hyperlocomotor response is preferentially expressed in the center of an activity box, so that the response resembles the more generalized activity that is produced by d-amphetamine (AMPH).

Objectives

The present study was designed to determine whether common neuroadaptations underlie the acute and sensitized responses to MDMA and AMPH.

Methods

Rats were pretreated with five daily injections of MDMA (10.0 mg/kg), AMPH (2.0 mg/kg), or saline. Following a 2-day drug-free period, dose–response curves for hyperactivity produced by MDMA (2.5–10.0 mg/kg), AMPH (0.5–2.0 mg/kg), SKF-81297 (1.0–2.0 mg/kg), or quinpirole (0.25–1.0 mg/kg) were obtained.

Results

Effects of MDMA and AMPH were increased by pretreatment with both drugs. The sensitized response following MDMA exposure was preferentially expressed in the center compartment, but, following AMPH pretreatment, the sensitized response was observed in both compartments. Cross-sensitization was unidirectional; AMPH pretreatment failed to sensitize to the effects of MDMA, but MDMA pretreatment sensitized to the effects of AMPH. MDMA and AMPH pretreatment produced marginal increases in the effects of SKF-81297. The response to quinpirole was, however, greater following MDMA, but not AMPH, pretreatment.

Conclusions

These data suggest that repeated MDMA exposure produces sensitization via a unique neurochemical effect.

Keywords

MDMA Amphetamine Sensitization SKF-81297 Quinpirole Dopamine Hyperactivity 

Notes

Funding source

Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund

Conflict of interest

The authors do not declare any conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aberg M, Wade D, Wall E, Izenwasser S (2007) Effect of MDMA (ecstasy) on activity and cocaine conditioned place preference in adult and adolescent rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 29:37–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams LM, Geyer MA (1985) Effects of DOM and DMT in a proposed animal model of hallucinogenic activity. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 9:121–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aman TK, Shen RY, Haj-Dahmane S (2007) D2-like dopamine receptors depolarize dorsal raphe serotonin neurons through the activation of nonselective cationic conductance. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320:376–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball KT, Budreau D, Rebec GV (2003) Acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on striatal single-unit activity and behaviour in freely moving rats: differential involvement of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors. Brain Res 994:203–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball KT, Budreau D, Rebec GV (2006) Context-dependent behavioural and neuronal sensitization in striatum to MDMA (ecstasy) administration in rats. Brain Res 994:203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball KT, Wellman CL, Fortenberry E, Rebec GV (2009) Sensitizing regimens of (±)- 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) elicit enduring and differential structural alterations in the brain motive circuit of the rat. Neuroscience 160:264–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball KT, Klein JE, Plocinski JA, Slack R (2011) Behavioral sensitization to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine is long-lasting and modulated by the context of drug administration. Behav Pharmacol 22:847–850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardo MT, Valone JM, Bevins RA (1999) Locomotion and conditioned place preference produced by acute intravenous amphetamine: role of dopamine receptors and individual receptors and individual differences in amphetamine self-administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 143:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Battaglia G, Brooks BP, Kulsakdinun C, De Souza EB (1988) Pharmacologic profile of MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine) at various brain recognition sites. Eur J Pharmacol 149:159–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilsky EJ, Montegut MJ, Nichols ML, Reid LD (1998) CGS 10746B, a novel dopamine release inhibitor, blocks the establishment of cocaine and MDMA conditioned place preferences. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 59:215–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowery B, Rothwell LA, Seabrook GR (1994) Comparison between the pharmacology of dopamine receptors mediating the inhibition of cell firing in rat brain slices through the substantia nigra pars compacta and ventral tegmental area. Br J Pharmacol 112:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brennan KA, Carati C, Lea RA, Fitzmaurice PS, Schenk S (2009) Effect of D1-like and D2-like receptor agonists on methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine self-administration in rats. Behav Pharmacol 20:688–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brodkin J, Malyala A, Nash JF (1993) Effect of acute monoamine depletion on 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 45:647–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bubar MJ, Pack KM, Frankel PS, Cunningham KA (2004) Effects of dopamine D1- or D2-like receptor antagonists on the hypermotive and discriminative stimulus effects of (+)- MDMA. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 173:326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bull EJ, Hutson PH, Fone KC (2004) Decreased social behaviour following 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is accompanied by changes in 5HT2A receptor responsivity. Neuropharmacology 46:202–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Callaway CW, Wing LL, Geyer MA (1990) Serotonin release contributes to the locomotor stimulant effects of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254:456–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Colussi-Mas J, Schenk S (2008) Acute and sensitized responses to 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in rats: different behavioural profiles reflected in different patterns of Fos expression. Eur J Neurosci 28:1895–1910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colussi-Mas J, Wise RJ, Howard A, Schenk S (2010) Drug seeking in response to a priming injection of MDMA in rats: relationship to initial sensitivity to self-administered MDMA and dorsal striatal dopamine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13:1315–1327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Commins DL, Vosmer G, Virus RM, Woolverton WL, Schuster CR, Seiden LS (1987) Biochemical and histological evidence that methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is toxic to neurons in the rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 241:338–345PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Costall B, Naylor RJ (1974) The involvement of dopaminergic systems with the stereotyped behaviour patterns induced by methylphenidate. J Pharm Pharmacol 26:30–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crombag HS, Badiani A, Chan J, Dell’Orco J, Dineen SP, Robinson TE (2001) The ability of environmental context to facilitate psychomotor sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and on conditioned responding. Neuropsychopharmaclogy 24:680–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daniela E, Brennan K, Gittings D, Hely L, Schenk S (2004) Effect of SCH-23390 on (+/−)- 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine hyperactivity and self-administration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 77:745–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Vries TJ, Schoffelmeer AN, Binnekade R, Raasø H, Vanderschuren LJ (2002) Relapse to cocaine- and heroin-seeking behaviour mediated by dopamine D2 receptors is time-dependent and associated with behavioural sensitization. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:18–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Depoortere R, Boulay D, Perrault G, Bergis O, Decobert M, Francon D, Jung M, Simiand J, Soubrie P, Scatton B (2003) SSR 181507, a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist and 5-HT1A receptor agonist. II: behavioural profile predictive of an atypical antipsychotic activity. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1889–1902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Di Chiara G, Bassareo V (2007) Reward system and addiction: what dopamine does and doesn’t do. Curr Opin Pharmacol 7:69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eilam D, Szechtman H (1989) Biphasic effect of D-2 agonist quinpirole on locomotion and movements. Eur J Pharmacol 28:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eilam D, Szechtman H (1990) Dosing regimen differentiates sensitization of locomotion and mouthing to D2 agonist quinpirole. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36:989–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eilam D, Golani I, Szechtman H (1989) D2-agonist quinpirole induces perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perseveration of movements. Brain Res 490:255–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eilam D, Clements KV, Szechtman H (1991) Differential effects of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists on stereotyped locomotion in rats. Behav Brain Res 45:117–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eilam D, Talangbayan H, Canaran G, Szechtman H (1992) Dopaminergic control of locomotion, mouthing, snout contact, and grooming: opposing roles of D1 and D2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 106:447–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fog R (1969) Stereotyped and non-stereotyped behaviour in rats induced by various stimulant drugs. Psychopharmacologia 14:299–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gartside SE, McQuade R, Sharp T (1996) Effects of repeated administration of 3, 4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine on 5-hydroxytryptamine neuronal activity and release in the rat brain in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 279:277–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gold LH, Hubner CB, Koob GF (1989a) A role for the mesolimbic dopamine system in the psychostimulant actions of MDMA. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 99:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gold LH, Koob GF, Geyer MA (1989b) Spatial pattern analysis reveals similarities between amphetamine conditioned and unconditioned locomotion. Behav Pharmacol 1:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Herin DV, Liu S, Ullrich T, Rice KC, Cunningham KA (2005) Role of the serotonin 5HT-2Areceptor in the hyperlocomotive and hyperthermic effects of (±)- 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 178:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones K, Brennan KA, Colussi-Mas J, Schenk S (2010) Tolerance to 3, 4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine is associated with impaired serotonin release. Addict Biol 15:289–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalivas PW, Duffy P, White SR (1998) MDMA elicits behavioral and neurochemical sensitization in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 18:469–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kehne JH, Ketteler HJ, McCloskey TC, Sullivan CK, Dudley MW, Schmidt CJ (1996) Effects of the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL 100,907 on MDMA-induced locomotor stimulation in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 15:116–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kelly PH, Iversen SD (1976) Selective 6OHDA-induced destruction of mesolimbic dopamine neurons: abolition of psychostimulant-induced locomotor activity in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 40:45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelly PH, Seviour PW, Iversen SD (1975) Amphetamine and apomorphine responses in the rat following 6-OHDA lesions of the nucleus accumbens septi and corpus striatum. Brain Res 94:507–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levant B, Grigoriadis DE, De Souza EB (1993) [3H] quinpirole binding to putative D2 and D3 dopamine receptors in rat brain and pituitary gland: a quantitative autoradiographic study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 264:991–1001PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lévesque D, Diaz J, Pilon C, Martres MP, Giros B, Souil E, Schott D, Morgat JL, Schwartz JC, Sokoloff P (1992) Identification, characterization, and localization of the dopamine D3 receptor in rat brain using 7-[3 H]hydroxy-N, N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:8155–8159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ludwig V, Mihov Y, Schwarting RK (2008) Behavioral and neurochemical consequences of multiple MDMA administrations in the rat: role of individual differences in anxiety-related behavior. Behav Brain Res 189:52–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mazurski EJ, Beninger RJ (1991) Effects of selective drugs for dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors on conditioned locomotion in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 105:107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCreary AC, Bankson MG, Cunningham KA (1999) Pharmacological studies of the acute and chronic effects of (+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on locomotor activity: role of 5-hydroxytryptamine (1A) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (1B/1D) receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290:965–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Menalled LB, Dziewczapolski G, Garcia MC, Rubinstein M, Gershanik OS (1999) D3 receptor knockdown through antisense oligonucleotide administration supports its inhibitory role in locomotion. Neuroreport 10:3131–3136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mithani S, Martin-Iverson MT, Phillips AG, Fibirger HC (1986) The effects of haloperidol on amphetamine- and methylphenidate-induced conditioned place preferences and locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 90:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Modi GM, Yang PB, Swann AC, Dafny N (2006) Chronic exposure to MDMA (ecstasy) elicits behavioral sensitization in rats but fails to induce cross-sensitization to other psychostimulants. Behav Brain Funct 4. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-2-1
  49. Morley KC, McGregor IS (2000) (+/−)- 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ‘ecstasy’) increases social interaction in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 408:41–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Morley KC, Gallate JE, Hunt GE, Mallet PE, McGregor IS (2001) Increased anxiety and impaired memory in rats 3 months after administration of,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“ecstasy”). Eur J Pharmacol 433:91–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morley KC, Arnold JC, McGregor IS (2005) Serotonin (1A) receptor involvement in acute 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) facilitation of social interaction in the rat. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 29:648–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Hearn E, Battaglia G, De Souza EB, Kuhar MJ, Molliver ME (1988) Methylenedioaxyamphetamine (MDA) and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) cause selective ablation of serotonergic axon terminals in forebrain: immunocytochemical evidence for neurotoxicity. J Neurosci 8:2788–2803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pierce RC, Kalivas PW (1997) A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like stimulants. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 25:192–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Post RM, Rose H (1976) Increasing effects of repetitive cocaine administration in the rat. Nature 260:731–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ramos M, Goni-Allo B, Aguirre N (2004) Studies on the role of dopamine D1 receptors in the development and expression of MDMA-induced behavioural sensitization in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177:100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ramos M, Goni-Allo B, Aguirre N (2005a) Administration of SCH-23390 into the medial prefrontal cortex blocks the expression of MDMA-induced behavioral sensitization in rats: an effect mediated by 5-HT2C receptor stimulation and not by D1 receptor blockade. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:2180–2191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramos M, Goni-Allo B, Aguirre N (2005b) Ibotenic acid lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex block the development and expression of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in rats. Behav Brain Res 160:304–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rempel NL, Callaway CW, Geyer MA (1993) Serotonin 1B receptor activation mimics behavioural effects of presynaptic serotonin release. Neuropsychopharmacology 8:201–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Richtand NM, Welge JA, Levant B, Logue AD, Hayes S, Pritchard LM, Geracioti TD, Coolen LM, Berger SP (2003) Altered behavioral response to dopamine D3 receptor agonists 7-OH-DPAT and PD 128907 following repetitive amphetamine administration. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:1422–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Risbrough VB, Masten VL, Caldwell S, Paulus MP, Low MJ, Geyer MA (2006) Differential contributions of dopamine D1, D2, and D3 receptors to MDMA-induced effects on locomotor behavior patterns in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:2349–2358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 18:247–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudnick G, Wall SC (1992) The molecular mechanism of “ecstasy” [3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA)]: serotonin transporters are targets for MDMA-induced serotonin release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:1817–1821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sautel F, Griffon N, Lévesque D, Pilon C, Schwartz JC, Sokoloff P (1995) A functional test identifies dopamine agonists selective for D3 versus D2 receptors. Neuroreport 6:329–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schmidt CJ (1987) Acute administration of methylenedioxymethamphetamine: comparison with the neurochemical effects of its N-desmethyl and N-ethyl analogs. Eur J Pharmacol 136:81–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Segal DS, Mandell AJ (1974) Long term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2:249–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sokoloff P, Giros B, Martres MP, Bouthenet ML, Schwartz JC (1990) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel dopamine receptor (D3) as a target for neuroleptics. Nature 347(6289):146–151Google Scholar
  67. Stanwood GD, Artymyshyn RP, Kung MP, Kung HF, Lucki I, McGonigle P (2000) Quantitative autoradiographic mapping of rat brain dopamine D3 binding with [(125)I]7-OH-PIPAT: evidence for the presence of D3 receptors on dopaminergic and nondopaminergic cell bodies and terminals. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295:1223–1231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Stone DM, Stahl DC, Hanson GR, Gibb JW (1986) The effects of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3, 4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) on monoaminergic systems in the rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol 128:41–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Szumlinski KK, Szechtman H (2002) D2 receptor blockade in the dorsal raphe increases quinpirole-induced locomotor excitation. Neuroreport 13:563–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thompson VB, Heiman J, Chambers JB, Benoit SC, Buesing WR, Norman MK, Norman AB, Lipton JW (2009) Long-term behavioral consequences of prenatal MDMA exposure. Physiol Behav 96:593–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ujike H, Akiyama K, Otsuki S (1990) D-2 but not D-1 agonists produce augmented behavioral response in rats after subchronic treatment with methamphetamine or cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 102:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Van Hartesveldt C (1997) Temporal and environmental effects on quinpirole-induced biphasic locomotion in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 58:955–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vanderschuren LJ, Kalivas PW (2000) Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151:99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vanderschuren LJ, Schoffelmeer AN, Mulder AH, de Vries TJ (1999) Dopaminergic mechanisms mediating the long-term expression of locomotor sensitization following pre-exposure to morphine or amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 143:244–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vezina P (2004) Sensitization of midbrain dopamine neuron reactivity and the self-administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:827–839PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. White SR, Obradovic T, Imel KM, Wheaten MJ (1996) The effects of methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”) on monoaminergic neurotransmission in the central nervous system. Prog Neurobiol 49:455–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations