Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Cocaine and opioids are often co-abused. As yet, however, there is no clear evidence that the drugs interact to make the mixture a more effective reinforcer.

Objective

The present study examined the relative reinforcing potency and maximum effectiveness of the cocaine–opioid combination in monkeys given a choice between cocaine–opioid mixtures and the single-component drugs.

Method

Rhesus monkeys were allowed to choose between injections of cocaine (100 μg/kg/inj) and other doses of cocaine (10–560 μg/kg/inj) or remifentanil (0.03–3.0 μg/kg/inj). A dose-addition model was used to select dose combinations for mixtures of cocaine and remifentanil predicted to be equivalent to 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine in reinforcing effect if the drugs were additive. The monkeys were then allowed to choose between (a) cocaine and mixtures predicted to be equivalent to 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine, (b) increasing doses of the mixtures and the single-component drugs, and (c) cocaine or remifentanil at doses that were in the highest safe range.

Results

Generally, monkeys preferred the mixtures over 100 μg/kg/inj of cocaine, evidence for superadditivity. However, preferences for the mixture ceased when relatively high doses of single-component drugs were offered as alternatives. When doses within the mixture were raised and offered with relatively high doses of the single drugs, there was no clear preference for either option. The highest dose of remifentanil was chosen over the highest dose of cocaine by all monkeys.

Conclusion

The current results indicate that cocaine–opioid combinations can be super-additive in terms of potency, but are not, at maximum, more effective than the single-component drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JM, Roberts DCS (1997) A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:441–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, DeGrandpre RJ, Higgins ST (1993) Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:173–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coffin PO, Galea S, Ahem J, Leon AC, Vlahov D, Tardiff K (2003) Opiates, cocaine and alcohol combinations in accidental drug overdose deaths in New York City, 1990-1998. Addiction 98:739–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comer SD, Ashworth JB, Foltin RW, Johanson CE, Zacny JP, Walsh SL (2008) The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications. Drug Alcohol Depend 96:1–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downey KK, Helmus TC, Schuster CR (2000) Treatment of heroin-dependent polydrug abusers with contingency management and buprenorphine maintenance. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8:176–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duvauchelle CL, Sapoznik T, Kornetsky C (1998) The synergistic effects of combining cocaine and heroin (“speedball”) using a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 61:297–302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foltin RW, Fischman MW (1992) The cardiovascular and subjective effects of intravenous cocaine and morphine combinations in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261:623–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grella CE, Anglin MD, Wugalter SE (1995) Cocaine and crack use and HIV risk behaviors among high-risk methadone maintenance clients. Drug Alcohol Depend 37:15–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR (1984) Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav 42:435–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR (1993) Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: an introduction. Drug Alcohol Depend 33:165–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hursh SR, Silberburg A (2008) Economic demand and essential value. Psych Rev 115:186–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe GW, Simpson DD (1995) HIV risks, gender, and cocaine use among opiate users. Drug Alcohol Depend 37:23–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CE, Schuster CR (1975) A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 193:676–688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koffarnus MN, Woods JH (2008) Quantification of drug choice with the generalized matching law in rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 89:209–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kosten TR, Rounsaville BJ, Kleber HD (1988) Antecedents and consequences of cocaine abuse among opioid addicts. A 2.5-year follow-up. J Nerv Ment Dis 176:176–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leri F, Bruneau J, Stewart J (2003) Understanding polydrug use: review of heroin and cocaine co-use. Addiction 98:7–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattox AJ, Thompson SS, Carroll ME (1997) Smoked heroin and cocaine base (speedball) combinations in rhesus monkeys. Exp Clin Psychopharmcol 5:113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Negus S (2005) Interactions between the reinforcing effects of cocaine and heroin in a drug-vs-food choice procedure in rhesus monkeys: a dose-addition analysis. Psychopharm 180:115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa KC, Hahn JA, Seal KH, Moss AR (2001) Overdosing among young injection drug users in San Francisco. Addict Behav 26:453–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez de los Cobos J, Turjols J, Ribalta E, Casas M (1997) Cocaine use immediately prior to entry in an inpatient heroin detoxification unit as a predictor of discharges against medical advice. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 23:267–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preston KL, Sullivan JT, Strain EC, Bigelow GE (1996) Enhancement of cocaine’s abuse liability in methadone maintenance patients. Psychopharm 123:15–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranaldi R, Munn E (1998) Polydrug self-administration in rats: cocaine-heroin is more rewarding than cocaine-alone. Neuro Report 9:2463–2466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK (2000) A labor-supply analysis of cocaine self-administration under progressive-ratio schedules: antecedents, methodologies, and perspectives. Psychopharm 153:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Woolverton WL (1997) Self-administration of cocaine and heroin combinations by rhesus monkeys responding under a progressive-ratio schedule. Psychopharm 133:363–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Rodefer JS, Spealman RD (2005) Self-administration of cocaine-opioid combinations by rhesus monkeys: evaluation of the role of μ receptor efficacy using labor supply analysis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312:1289–1287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlett JK, Platt DM, Yao WD, Spealman RD (2007) Modulation of heroin and cocaine self-administration by dopamine D1- and D2-like receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 321:1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford D, LeSage MG, Glowa JR (1998) Progressive-ratio schedules of drug delivery in the analysis of drug self-administration: a review. Psychopharm 139:169–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tallarida RJ (2000) Drug synergism and dose-effect data analysis. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wade-Galuska T, Winger G, Woods JH (2007) A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharm 194:563–572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang NS, Brown VL, Grabowski J, Meisch RA (2001) Reinforcement by orally delivered methadone, cocaine, and methadone-cocaine combinations in rhesus monkeys: are the combinations better reinforcers? Psychopharm 156:63–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward SJ, Morgan D, Roberts DCS (2005) Comparison of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and cocaine/heroin combinations under progressive ratio and choice schedules in rats. Neuropsychopharm 30:286–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson A, Darke S, Ross J, Teeson M (2006) The effect of persistence of cocaine use on 12-month outcomes for the treatment of heroin dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend 81:293–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winger G, Galuska CM, Hursh SR, Woods JH (2006) Relative reinforcing effects of cocaine, remifentanil, and their combination in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 318:223–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL (1987) Analysis of drug interactions in behavioral pharmacology. In: Thompson T, Dews PB, Barrett JE (eds) Neurobehavioral Pharmacology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 275–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL, Johanson CE (1984) Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d, l-cathinone. J Exp Anal Behav 31:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL, Wang Z (2009) Self-administration of cocaine-pentobarbital mixtures by rhesus monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend 100:272–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL, Myerson J, Green L (2007) Delay discounting of cocaine by rhesus monkeys. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:238–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Woolverton WL, Wang Z, Vasterling T, Tallarida R (2008) Self-administration of cocaine-remifentanil mixtures by monkeys: an isobolographic analysis. Psychopharm 198:387–394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This research was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse grant R01 DA-019471 to W.L.W. We gratefully acknowledge Steven Ross for his technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurobiology and Behavior Research, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, 39216, USA

    Kevin B. Freeman & William L. Woolverton

Authors
  1. Kevin B. Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William L. Woolverton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin B. Freeman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeman, K.B., Woolverton, W.L. Self-administration of cocaine and remifentanil by monkeys: choice between single drugs and mixtures. Psychopharmacology 215, 281–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2131-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-2131-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation