Skip to main content
Log in

Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in male Sprague–Dawley rats and their acquisition of and motivation to self-administer cocaine

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Factors that increase an individual’s susceptibility to cocaine dependence remain largely unknown. We have previously shown that adult outbred male Sprague–Dawley rats can be classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity following the administration of a single dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, LCR/HCR classification predicts dopamine transporter function/inhibition, cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, and cocaine-conditioned place preference.

Objectives

The present study assessed LCR/HCR classification and the development of locomotor sensitization on the latency to acquire cocaine self-administration and motivation to self-administer cocaine.

Results

LCRs and HCRs did not differ in their latency to acquire low-dose cocaine self-administration (0.25 mg/kg/infusion over 12 s, fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement). In a follow-up experiment, repeated experimenter-administered injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in locomotor sensitization for LCRs, but not HCRs; nonetheless, all rats exhibited decreased latency to acquire cocaine self-administration compared to the first experiment. Repeated cocaine preexposure and LCR/HCR classification predicted break point when rats responded for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion; multiple exposure>single exposure, LCR>HCR), but there was no interaction between these variables.

Conclusions

Although LCR/HCR classification did not predict the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration under these conditions, LCR rats demonstrated greater responding for cocaine after acquisition (PR). Thus, these findings demonstrate the relevance of using the LCR/HCR model when studying susceptibility to cocaine dependence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed SH, Cador M (2006) Dissociation of psychomotor sensitization from compulsive cocaine consumption. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:563–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RM, Everett CV, Nelson AM, Gulley JM, Zahniser NR (2007) Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague–Dawley rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:37–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SM, Roberts DCS (1997) A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 57:441–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briegleb SK, Gulley JM, Hoover BR, Zahniser NR (2004) Individual differences in cocaine- and amphetamine-induced activation of male Sprague–Dawley rats: contribution of the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:2168–2179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caine SB, Lintz R, Koob GF (1993) Intravenous drug self-administration techniques in animals. In: Sahgal A (ed) Behavioral neuroscience: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 117–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey RJ, DePalma G, Damianopoulos E (2003) Response to novelty as a predictor of cocaine sensitization and conditioning in rats: a correlational analysis. Psychopharmacology 168:245–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Tilley MR, Wei H, Zhou F, Zhou F-M, Ching S, Quan N, Stephens RL, Hill ER, Nottoli T, Han DD, Gu HH (2006) Abolished cocaine reward in mice with a cocaine-insensitive dopamine transporter. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 103:9333–9338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:581–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrario CR, Gorny G, Crombag HS, Li Y, Kolb B, Robinson TE (2005) Neural and behavioral plasticity associated with the transition from controlled to escalated cocaine use. Biol Psychiatry 58:751–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:191–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gulley JM (2007) Individual differences in novelty- and cocaine-induced locomotor activity as predictors of food-reinforced operant behavior in two outbred rat strains. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 86:749–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gulley JM, Hoover BR, Larson GA, Zahniser NR (2003) Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in rats: behavioral characteristics, cocaine pharmacokinetics, and the dopamine transporter. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:2089–2101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horger BA, Shelton K, Schenk S (1990) Preexposure sensitizes rats to the rewarding effects of cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37:707–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lack CM, Jones SR, Roberts DC (2008) Increased breakpoints on a progressive ratio schedule reinforced by IV cocaine are associated with reduced locomotor activation and reduced dopamine efflux in nucleus accumbens shell in rats. Psychopharmacology 195:517–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert NM, McLeod M, Schenk S (2006) Subjective responses to initial experience with cocaine: an exploration of the incentive-sensitization theory of drug abuse. Addiction 101:713–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Roberts DCS, Morgan D (2005) Sensitization to the reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rats: effects of dose and intravenous injection speed. Eur J Neurosci 22:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendrek A, Blaha CD, Phillips AG (1998) Pre-exposure of rats to amphetamine sensitizes self-administration of this drug under a progressive ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology 135:416–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JM, Cunningham CL, Mark GP (2005) Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake. Behav Neurosci 119:464–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D, Liu Y, Roberts DCS (2006) Rapid and persistent sensitization to the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:121–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza PV, Deminiere J-M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511–1515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre PJ, Vezina P (1997) Predisposition to self-administer amphetamine: the contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology 129:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Weiss SR, Fontana D, Pert A (1992) Conditioned sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant cocaine. Ann NY Acad Sci 654:386–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quertemont E, Brabant C, Tirelli E (2004) Response to novelty as a predictor of drug effects: the pitfalls of some correlational studies. Psychopharmacology 173:221–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson NR, Roberts DCS (1996) Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods 66:1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz MC, Lamb RJ, Goldberg SR, Kuhar MJ (1987) Cocaine receptors on dopamine transporters are related to self-administration of cocaine. Science 237:1219–1223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Berridge KC (2001) Incentive-sensitization and addiction. Addiction 96:103–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabeti J, Gerhardt GA, Zahniser NR (2002) Acute cocaine differentially alters accumbens and striatal dopamine clearance in low and high cocaine locomotor responders: behavioral and electrochemical recordings in freely moving rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302:1201–1211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabeti J, Gerhardt GA, Zahniser NR (2003) Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in low and high cocaine locomotor-responding rats are associated with differential inhibition of dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 305:180–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schenk S, Partridge B (2000) Sensitization to cocaine’s reinforcing effects produced by various cocaine pretreatment regimens in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 66:765–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuckit MA (1994) Low level of response to alcohol as a predictor of future alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 151:184–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuckit MA, Smith TL, Pierson J, Danko GP, Beltran I (2006) Relationships among level of response to alcohol and the number of alcoholic relatives in predicting alcohol-related outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30:1308–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suto N, Austin JD, Tanabe LM, Kramer MK, Wright DA, Vezina P (2002) Previous exposure to VTA amphetamine enhances cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule in a D1 dopamine receptor dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:970–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suto N, Tanabe LM, Austin JD, Creekmore E, Vezina P (2003) Previous exposure to VTA amphetamine enhances cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule in an NMDA, AMPA/kainate, metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:629–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderschuren LJMJ, Di Ciano P, Everitt BJ (2005) Involvement of the dorsal striatum in cue-controlled cocaine seeking. J Neurosci 25:8665–8670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volkow ND, Wang G-J, Telang F, Fowler JS, Logan J, Childress A-R, Jayne M, Yeming M, Wong C (2006) Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci 26:6583–6588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zahniser NR, Peris J (1992) Neurochemical mechanisms of cocaine-induced sensitization. In: Lakoski JM, Galloway MP, White FJ (eds) Cocaine: pharmacology, physiology, and clinical strategies. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 229–260

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work and the authors were supported by NIH grants R37 DA004216, F31 DA023343, T32 GM007635, and K05 DA015050.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce H. Mandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mandt, B.H., Schenk, S., Zahniser, N.R. et al. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in male Sprague–Dawley rats and their acquisition of and motivation to self-administer cocaine. Psychopharmacology 201, 195–202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1265-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1265-x

Keywords

Navigation