Abstract
Rationale
Cross-sensitization between cocaine and amphetamine has been demonstrated in different behavioral paradigms. There is a relative paucity of studies examining whether cross-sensitization occurs between amphetamine and cocaine when both are self-administered.
Objective
The current study was designed to test whether animals sensitized to the reinforcing effects of cocaine would show cross-sensitization of the reinforcing effects of amphetamine, using a self-administration paradigm.
Materials and methods
Male, Sprague–Dawley rats were trained to self-administer cocaine and given limited or high exposure to cocaine under a fixed ratio (FR) 1 procedure. After the initial exposure to cocaine, animals self-administered cocaine (1.5 mg/kg per injection) under a progressive ratio (PR) procedure. Subsequently, breakpoints on a PR schedule and rates of intake on an FR schedule maintained by different doses of amphetamine were assessed.
Results
Animals with high initial exposure to cocaine (40 injections of 1.5 mg/kg per injection per day for 5 days) showed stable breakpoints throughout testing. Animals given limited initial cocaine exposure (20 injections of 0.75 mg/kg per injection for 1 day) produced a gradual increase in breakpoints maintained by cocaine over time (i.e., sensitization of the reinforcing effects of cocaine). When subsequently tested with amphetamine, the dose–effect curve was shifted upward in the limited-exposure group relative to the high-exposure group, suggesting cross-sensitization of the reinforcing effects of amphetamine.
Conclusions
Sensitization of the reinforcing effects of cocaine resulted in cross-sensitization of the reinforcing effects of amphetamine. This phenomenon occurs even when both drugs are self-administered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonate PL, Swann A, Silverman PB (1997) Context-dependent cross-sensitization between cocaine and amphetamine. Life Sci 60:PL1–PL7
de Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–825
Dworkin SI, Mirkis S, Smith JE (1995) Response-dependent versus response-independent presentation of cocaine: differences in the lethal effects of the drug. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 117:262–266
Ferrario CR, Robinson TE (2007) Amphetamine pretreatment accelerates the subsequent escalation of cocaine self-administration behavior. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 17:352–357
Fischman MW, Schuster CR, Hatano Y (1983) A comparison of the subjective and cardiovascular effects of cocaine and lidocaine in humans. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 18:123–127
Gawin FH (1991) Cocaine addiction: psychology and neurophysiology. Science 251:1580–1586
Hemby SE, Co C, Koves TR, Smith JE, Dworkin SI (1997) Differences in extracellular dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens during response-dependent and response-independent cocaine administration in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 133:7–16
Horger BA, Giles MK, Schenk S (1992) Preexposure to amphetamine and nicotine predisposes rats to self-administer a low dose of cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 107:271–276
Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy, Washington, DC
Kalivas PW, Weber B (1988) Amphetamine injection into the ventral mesencephalon sensitizes rats to peripheral amphetamine and cocaine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 245:1095–1102
Kramer JC, Fischman VS, Littlefield DC (1967) Amphetamine abuse. Pattern and effects of high doses taken intravenously. JAMA 201:305–309
Lamb RJ, Henningfield JE (1994) Human d-amphetamine drug discrimination: methamphetamine and hydromorphone. J Exp Anal Behav 61:169–180
Lecca D, Cacciapaglia F, Valentini V, Acquas E, Di Chiara G (2007) Differential neurochemical and behavioral adaptation to cocaine after response contingent and noncontingent exposure in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 191:653–667
Lett BT (1989) Repeated exposures intensify rather than diminish the rewarding effects of amphetamine, morphine, and cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 98:357–362
Liu Y, Roberts DCS, Morgan D (2005) Sensitization of the reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rats: effects of dose and intravenous injection speed. Eur J Neurosci 22:195–200
McFarland K, Lapish CC, Kalivas PW (2003) Prefrontal glutamate release into the core of the nucleus accumbens mediates cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci 23:3531–3537
Morgan D, Liu Y, Roberts DCS (2006) Rapid and persistent sensitization to the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:121–128
O’Brien CP (2001) Drug addiction and drug abuse. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE (eds) Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 622
Porrino LJ (1993) Functional consequences of acute cocaine treatment depend on route of administration. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 112:343–351
Post RM (1975) Cocaine psychoses: a continuum model. Am J Psychiatry 132:225–231
Post RM, Kopanda RT (1976) Cocaine, kindling, and psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 133:627–634
Richardson NR, Roberts DCS (1996) Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods 66:1–11
Roberts DCS, Goeders NE (1989) Drug self-administration: experimental methods and determinants. In: Boulton AA, Baker GB, Greenshaw AJ (eds) Neuromethods: psychopharmacology. Clifton, Humana, pp 349–398
Sato M, Chen CC, Akiyama K, Otsuki S (1983) Acute exacerbation of paranoid psychotic state after long-term abstinence in patients with previous methamphetamine psychosis. Biol Psychiatry 18:429–440
Schenk S, Snow S, Horger BA (1991) Pre-exposure to amphetamine but not nicotine sensitizes rats to the motor activating effect of cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 103:62–66
Shippenberg TS, Heidbreder C (1995) Sensitization to the conditioned rewarding effects of cocaine: pharmacological and temporal characteristics. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273:808–815
Shuster L, Yu G, Bates A (1977) Sensitization to cocaine stimulation in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 52:185–190
Stefanski R, Ziolkowska B, Kusmider M, Mierzejewski P, Wyszogrodzka E, Kolomanska P, Dziedzicka-Wasylewska M, Przewlocki R, Kostowski W (2007) Active versus passive cocaine administration: differences in the neuroadaptive changes in the brain dopaminergic system. Brain Res 1157:1–10
Suto N, Austin JD, Tanabe LM, Kramer MK, Wright DA, Vezina P (2002) Previous exposure to VTA amphetamine enhances cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule in a D1 dopamine receptor dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:970–979
Suto N, Tanabe LM, Austin JD, Creekmore E, Vezina P (2003) Previous exposure to VTA amphetamine enhances cocaine self-administration under a progressive ratio schedule in an NMDA, AMPA/kainate, and metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 28:629–639
Suto N, Tanabe LM, Austin JD, Creekmore E, Pham CT, Vezina P (2004) Previous exposure to psychostimulants enhances the reinstatement of cocaine seeking by nucleus accumbens AMPA. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:2149–2159
Valadez A, Schenk S (1994) Persistence of the ability of amphetamine preexposure to facilitate acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 47:203–205
Vanderschuren LJ, Schmidt ED, De Vries TJ, Van Moorsel CA, Tilders FJ, Schoffelmeer AN (1999) A single exposure to amphetamine is sufficient to induce long-term behavioral, neuroendocrine, and neurochemical sensitization in rats. J Neurosci 19:9579–9586
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the National Institute of Drug Abuse grant R01DA14030 awarded to DCSR. DM was supported by NIH grant K01DA13957.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Morgan, D. & Roberts, D.C.S. Cross-sensitization of the reinforcing effects of cocaine and amphetamine in rats. Psychopharmacology 195, 369–375 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0909-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0909-6