Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 190, Issue 3, pp 391–400 | Cite as

The role of 5-HT1a and 5-HT2a receptors in attention and motor control: a mechanistic study in healthy volunteers

  • Marleen WingenEmail author
  • Kim P. C. Kuypers
  • Johannes G. Ramaekers
Original Investigation

Abstract

Rationale

Various studies have demonstrated a modulating role for serotonin in attention. Selective serotonin inhibitors have repeatedly been shown to impair performance in sustained attention tasks.

Objectives

To assess the contribution of serotonin reuptake inhibition and specific blockade of the pre-synaptic 5-HT1a receptor and the 5-HT2a receptor to deficits in attention.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, four-way crossover design including 16 healthy volunteers. Treatments consisted of oral administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram 20 mg + placebo; escitalopram 20 mg + ketanserin (5-HT2a antagonist), 50 mg; escitalopram 20 mg + pindolol (5-HT1a antagonist) 10 mg; and placebo + placebo on four separate days. A range of performance tasks were conducted to assess the subjects’ attention and motor functions.

Results

Escitalopram administered alone impaired tracking performance in a divided attention task. The combination of escitalopram and pindolol and escitalopram and ketanserin impaired divided attention as compared to placebo. In addition, escitalopram and ketanserin impaired sustained attention. Divided attention impairment observed after combined treatments did not significantly differ from impairments after escitalopram alone. Sustained attention impairment observed after combined escitalopram and ketanserin significantly differed from escitalopram alone.

Conclusions

5HT1a blockade hardly affected SSRI effects on attention. Additional 5HT2a blockade, however, produced impairments of sustained attention and motor impulse control.

Keywords

Attention Motor control Serotonergic receptor manipulations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Silke Conen and medical doctor C. J. van Leeuwen for their assistance in the data collection.

References

  1. Aellig WH, Narjes HH, Nuesch E, Oertle RJ, Devos JE, Pacha W (1981) A pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic comparison of pindolol 20 mg retard and a conventional tablet. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 20:179–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson S, Delgado P (2004) Escitalopram. Drugs Today (Bare) 40:121–131Google Scholar
  3. Blokland A, Sik A, Lieben C (2005) Evaluation of DOI, 8-OH-DPAT, eticlopride and amphetamine on impulsive responding in a reaction time task in rats. Behav Pharmacol 16:93–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47:211–218Google Scholar
  5. Bortolozzi A, Diaz Mataix L, Scorza MC, Celada P, Artigas F (2005) The activation of 5-HT receptors in prefrontal cortex enhances dopaminergic activity. J Neurochem 95:1597–1607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carli M, Samanin R (2000) The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT reduces rats’ accuracy of attentional performance and enhances impulsive responding in a five-choice serial reaction time task: role of presynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors. Psychopharmacology 149:259–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coull JT, Sahakian BJ, Middleton HC, Young AH, Park SB, McShane RH, Cowen PJ, Robbins TW (1995) Differential effects of clonidine, haloperidol, diazepam and tryptophan depletion on focused attention and attentional search. Psychopharmacology 121:222–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Wit H, Crean J, Richards JB (2000) Effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol on a measure of behavioral inhibition in humans. Behav Neurosci 114:830–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Wit H, Enggasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Matteo V, De Blasi A, Di Giulio C, Esposito E (2001) Role of 5-HT(2C) receptors in the control of central dopamine function. Trends Pharmacol Sci 22:229–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esposito E (2006) Serotonin–dopamin interaction as a focus of novel antidepressant drugs. Current Drug Targets 7:177–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harmer CJ, McTavish SFB, Clark L, Goodwin GM, Cowen PJ (2001) Tyrosine depletion attenuates dopamine function in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 154:105–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison AA, Everitt BJ, Robbins TW (1997) Central 5-HT depletion enhances impulsive responding without affecting the accuracy of attentional performance: interactions with dopaminergic mechanisms. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 133:329–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison BJ, Olver JS, Norman TR, Burrows GD, Wesnes KA, Nathan PJ (2004) Selective effects of acute serotonin and catecholamine depletion on memory in healthy women. J Psychopharmacol 18:32–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedner T, Persson B, Berglund G (1983) Ketanserin, a novel 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist: monotherapy in essential hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 16:121–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jex HR, McDonnell, JD, Phatak AV (1966) A “critical” tracking task for man–machine research related to the operators effective delay time. Part I: theory and experiments with a first order divergent controlled element. NASA CR-616, NASA Contractor Report. NASA CR:100–105Google Scholar
  17. Koelega HS (1993) Stimulant drugs and vigilance performance: a review. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 111:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liechti ME, Saur MR, Gamma A, Hell D, Vollenweider FX (2000) Psychological and physiological effects on MDMA ("Ecstasy") after pretreatment with the 5-HT(2) antagonist ketanserin in healthy humans. Neurophychopharmacology 23:396–404Google Scholar
  19. Logan GD (1994) On the ability to inhibit thought and action. In: Dagenbach D, Carr TH (eds) Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  20. Lucas G, Spampinato U (2000) Role of striatal serotonin2A and serotonin2C receptor subtypes in the control of in vivo dopamine outflow in the rat striatum. J Neurochem 74:693–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mackworth NH (1950) Researches on the measurement of human performance. In: Sinaiko HW (ed) Selected papers on human factors in the design and use of control systems. Dover, New York, pp 174–331Google Scholar
  22. Matrenza C, Hughes JM, Kemp AH, Wesnes KA, Harrison BJ, Nathan PJ (2004) Simultaneous depletion of serotonin and catecholamines impairs sustained attention in healthy female subjects without affecting learning and memory. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 18:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moskowitz H (1973) Laboratory studies of the effects of alcohol on some variables related to driving. J Saf Res 5:185–192Google Scholar
  24. Mulder-Hajonides van der Meulen WREH (1981) Measurement of subjective sleep quality. Proceedings of the International European Sleep Congress. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicholson AN, Pascoe PA (1990) Dopaminergic transmission and the sleep–wakefulness continuum in man. Neuropharmacology 29:411–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Hanlon J, Robbe HWJ, Vermeeren A, VanLeeuwen C, Danjou PE (1998) Venlafaxine’s effects on healthy volunteers’ driving, psychomotor, and vigilance performance during 15-day fixed and incremental dosing regimens. J Clin Psychopharmacol 18:212–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pribram KH, McGuinness D (1975) Arousal, activation, and effort in the control of attention. Psychol Rev 82:116–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabiner EA, Gunn RN, Wilkins MR, Sargent PA, Mocaer E, Sedman E, Cowen PJ, Grasby PM (2000) Drug action at the 5-HT(1A) receptor in vivo: autoreceptor and postsynaptic receptor occupancy examined with PET and [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635. Nucl Med Biol 27:509–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rabiner EA, Bhagwagar Z, Gunn RN, Sargent PA, Bench CJ, Cowen PJ, Grasby PM (2001) Pindolol augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: PET evidence that the dose used in clinical trials is too low. Am J Psychiatry 158:2080–2082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rabiner EA, Bhagwagar Z, Gunn RN, Cowen PJ, Grasby PM (2004) Preferential 5-HT1A autoreceptor occupancy by pindolol is attenuated in depressed patients: effect of treatment or an endophenotype of depression? Neuropsychopharmacology 29:1688–1698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramaekers JG, Kuypers KPC (2006) Acute effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on behavioral measures of impulsivity: alone and in combination with alcohol. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:1048–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramaekers JG, Muntjewerff ND, O’Hanlon JF (1995) A comparative study of acute and subchronic effects of dothiepin, fluoxetine and placebo on psychomotor and actual driving performance. Br J Pharmacol 39:397–404Google Scholar
  33. Rasmussen K, McCreary AC, Shanks EA (2004) Attenuation of the effects of fluoxetine on serotonergic neuronal activity by pindolol in rats. Neurosci Lett 355:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riedel WJ, Eikmans K, Heldens A, Schmitt JA (2005) Specific serotonergic reuptake inhibition impairs vigilance performance acutely and after subchronic treatment. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 19:12–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robbins TW (1997) Arousal systems and attentional processes. Biol Psychol 45:57–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robbins TW (2000) Chemical neuromodulation of frontal-executive functions in humans and other animals. Exp Brain Res 133:130–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schmitt JA, Jorissen BL, Sobczak S, van Boxtel MP, Hogervorst E, Deutz NE, Riedel WJ (2000) Tryptophan depletion impairs memory consolidation but improves focussed attention in healthy young volunteers. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 14:21–29Google Scholar
  38. Schmitt JA, Ramaekers JG, Kruizinga MJ, van Boxtel MP, Vuurman EF, Riedel WJ (2002) Additional dopamine reuptake inhibition attenuates vigilance impairment induced by serotonin reuptake inhibition in man. J Psychopharmacol (Oxf) 16:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Soubrie P (1986) Reconciling the role of central serotonin neurons in human and animal behavior. Behav Brain Sci 9:319–364Google Scholar
  40. Spoont MR (1992) Modulatory role of serotonin in neural information processing: implications for human psychopathology. Psychol Bull 112:330–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wingen M, Bothmer J, Langer S, Ramaekers JG (2005) Actual driving performance and psychomotor function in healthy subjects after acute and subchronic treatment with escitalopram, mirtazapine, and placebo: a crossover trial. J Clin Psychiatry 66:436–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marleen Wingen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kim P. C. Kuypers
    • 1
  • Johannes G. Ramaekers
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Psychology, Department of Neurocognition (Experimental Psychopharmacology Unit), Brain and Behaviour InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations