, Volume 188, Issue 2, pp 144–151 | Cite as

Impact of strain and d-amphetamine on impulsivity (delay discounting) in inbred mice

  • Christa M. Helms
  • Jamie M. Reeves
  • Suzanne H. Mitchell
Original Investigation



Many studies have shown that human drug abusers are more impulsive than nonusers, but the mechanisms underlying this difference are unknown. C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mouse strains differ in sensitivity to the associative effects and in self-administration of several drugs of abuse.


To determine whether these strains exhibit differences in impulsivity that might correspond to the differences in phenotypes related to drug seeking.


We examined impulsive choice in drug-naive B6 and D2 mice using a delay discounting protocol (adjusting amount procedure, J Exp Anal Behav 67:353–366, 1997).


Contrary to our initial expectations, we observed greater delay discounting (higher impulsivity) in D2 rather than in B6 mice. For both strains, discounting was enhanced by 0.80 and 1.20 mg/kg (i.p.) d-amphetamine relative to saline.


Data demonstrate the sensitivity of the procedure to strain differences and pharmacological manipulations. However, additional data are required to clarify the factors underlying this difference and how the delay discounting measure of impulsivity relates to phenotypic models of drug reinforcement and drug seeking.


Impulsivity Choice Delay discounting Amphetamine Inbred strains DBA/2J C57BL/6J 


  1. Ainslie G (1975) Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull 82:463–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum WM (1974) On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav 22:231–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belknap JK, Crabbe JC, Young ER (1993) Voluntary consumption of ethanol in 15 inbred mouse strains. Psychopharmacology 112:503–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickel WK, Marsch LA (2001) Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction 96:73–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1992) Choice between delayed reinforcers in a discrete-trials schedule: the effect of deprivation level. Q J Exp Psychol B 44:1–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabib S, Orsini C, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (2000) Abolition and reversal of strain differences in behavioral responses to drugs of abuse after a brief experience. Science 289:463–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cardinal RN, Cheung THC (2005) Nucleus accumbens core lesions retard instrumental learning and performance with delayed reinforcement in the rat. BMC Neurosci 6:9–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cardinal RN, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ (2000) The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide, α-flupenthixol and behavioural manipulations on choice of signalled and unsignalled delayed reinforcement in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 152:362–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carney JM, Landrum RW, Cheng MS, Seale TW (1991) Establishment of chronic intravenous drug self-administration in the C57BL/6J mouse. NeuroReport 2:477–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark MG, Vasilevsky S, Myers TM (2003) Air and shock two-way shuttlebox avoidance in C57BL/6J and 129X1/SvJ mice. Physiol Behav 78:117–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crabbe JC, Phillips TJ, Buck KJ, Cunningham CL, Belknap JK (1999) Identifying genes for alcohol and drug sensitivity: recent progress and future directions. Trends Neurosci 22:173–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham CL, Niehus DR, Malott DH, Prather LK (1992) Genetic differences in the rewarding and activating effects of morphine and ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 107:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evenden JL (1999) Varieties of impulsivity. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146:348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evenden JL, Ryan CN (1996) The pharmacology of impulsive behaviour in rats: the effects of drugs on response choice with varying delays of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 128:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrar AM, Kieres AK, Hausknecht KH, Richards JB, de Wit H (2003) Effects of reinforcer magnitude on an animal model of impulsive behavior. Behav Processes 64:261–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forgie ML, Beyerstein BL, Alexander BK (1988) Contributions of taste factors and gender to opioid preference in C57BL and DBA mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 95:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grahame NJ, Cunningham CL (1995) Genetic differences in intravenous cocaine self-administration between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 122:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green L, Myerson J (2004) A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychol Bull 130:769–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hausknecht KA, Vakiener K, Choi S, Kieres AK, Farrar AM, Acheson A, Zhuang X, de Wit H, Richards JB (2004) Differential performance of two inbred mouse strains on three laboratory models of impulsive behavior. Program No. 671.15. 2004 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho MY, Mobini S, Chiang TJ, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1999) Theory and method in the quantitative analysis of “impulsive choice” behaviour: implications for psychopharmacology. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isles AR, Humby T, Wilkinson LS (2003) Measuring impulsivity in mice using a novel operant delayed reinforcement task: effects of behavioural manipulations and d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 170:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Isles AR, Humby T, Walters E, Wilkinson LS (2004) Common genetic effects on variation in impulsivity and activity in mice. J Neurosci 24:6733–6640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Logue AW (1988) Research on self-control: an integrating framework. Behav Brain Sci 11:665–709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madden GJ, Petry NM, Badger GJ, Bickel WK (1997) Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 5:256–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mazur JE (1987) An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In: Commons ML, Mazur JE, Nevin JA, Rachlin H (eds) Quantitative analysis of behavior, vol 5. The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 55–73Google Scholar
  26. Mazur JE (2001) Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice. Psychol Rev 108:96–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mitchell SH (1999) Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell SH, Reeves JM, Li N, Phillips TJ (2006) Delay discounting predicts behavioral sensitization to ethanol in outbred WSC mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30:429–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Perry JL, Larson EB, German JP, Madden GJ, Carroll S (2004) Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 178:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petry NM (2001) Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 154:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rachlin H, Green L (1972) Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav 17:15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards JB, Mitchell SH, de Wit H, Seiden LS (1997) Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure. J Exp Anal Behav 67:353–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Risinger F, Brown MM, Doan AM, Oakes RA (1998) Mouse strain differences in oral operant ethanol reinforcement under continuous access conditions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22:677–684PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Semenova S, Kuzmin A, Svartau E (1995) Strain differences in the analgesic and reinforcing action of morphine in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 50:17–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wade TR, de Wit H, Richards JB (2000) Effects of dopaminergic drugs on delayed reward as a measure of impulsive behavior in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 150:90–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christa M. Helms
    • 1
  • Jamie M. Reeves
    • 1
  • Suzanne H. Mitchell
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral Neuroscience L-470Oregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations