Skip to main content
Log in

Acute dose of alcohol affects cognitive components of reaction time to an omitted stimulus: differences among sensory systems

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The possibility that moderate blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) may impair cognitive processes before disturbing motor functions has raised concern about the safety of BACs ≤80 mg/100 ml. Reaction time (RT) to the presentation of a stimulus or to the omission of a regularly occurring stimulus has been fractionated into independent premotor (cognitive) and motor (movement) components. It has been suggested that cognitive processes may be impaired at lower BACs than are motor processes, but the effects of moderate rising and declining BACs on these component RT measures have not been investigated.

Objectives

An omitted stimulus RT task was used to test the hypothesis that moderate rising BACs impair (slow) premotor RT (PMRT) when motor RT (MRT) remains unaffected. The task included visual, auditory, and tactile stimuli to explore differences in sensory sensitivity to alcohol.

Methods

Thirty male social drinkers were randomly assigned to three groups (n=10) that received 0.62 g/kg alcohol, 0.8 g/kg alcohol, or a placebo (0 g/kg). All participants performed the task three times: baseline and during rising and declining BACs.

Results

Comparisons of the alcohol and placebo groups showed rising BACs slowed PMRT and had no detectable effect on MRT. Impairment in visual PMRT occurred under both alcohol doses. Auditory PMRT was impaired only under the 0.8 g/kg dose, and tactile PMRT was unaffected.

Conclusions

Cognitive functions are impaired by moderate increasing BACs that do not affect motor movement, and the tactile sensory system may be relatively insensitive to this impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Saunders J, Grant M (1992) AUDIT: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for use in primary health care. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthélémy S, Boulinguez P (2002) Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing. Behav Brain Res 133:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Botwinick J, Thompson LW (1966) Premotor and motor components of RT. J Exp Psychol 71:9–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH, Karamürsel S, Achimowicz JZ, McClune MC, Başar-Eroglu C (1994) Dynamic properties of human visual evoked and omitted stimulus potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:42–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore M, Vogel-Sprott M (1994) Psychomotor performance under alcohol and under caffeine: expectancy and pharmacological effects. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2:319–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore M, Vogel-Sprott M (1995) Expectancies about alcohol-induced motor impairment predict individual differences in responses to alcohol and placebo. J Stud Alcohol 56:90–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson R (1986a) Effect of moderate doses of alcohol on simple auditory reaction time in a vigilance setting. Percept Mot Skills 62:683–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson R (1986b) Alcohol and vigilance performance: effect of small doses of alcohol on simple visual reaction time. Percept Mot Skills 62:951–955

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hellige JB (1993) Hemispheric asymmetry: what’s right and what’s left. In: Kosslyn SM (ed) Perspectives in cognitive neuroscience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández OH, Ramón F, Bullock TH (1999) Expectation in invertebrates: crayfish have “omitted stimulus potentials” Proceedings of the sixth joint symposium on neural computation, vol. 9. University of California Press, San Diego, pp 50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández OH, Huchín-Ramirez TC, Vogel-Sprott M (2005) Behaviorally fractionated reaction time to an omitted stimulus: tests with visual, auditory and tactile stimuli. Percept Mot Skills 100:1066–1080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway FA (1995) Low-dose alcohol effects on human behavior and performance. Alcohol Drugs Driv 11:39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (1999) The crossed–uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized auditory stimuli is not a measure of interhemispheric transmission time: evidence from the split brain. Exp Brain Res 128:421–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ito M (1997) Fractionated reaction time as a function of magnitude of force in simple and choice conditions. Percept Mot Skills 85:435–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalant H, LeBlanc AE, Gibbins RJ (1971) Tolerance to, and dependence on, some non-opiate psychotropic drugs. Pharmacol Rev 23:135–191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karamürsel S, Bullock TH (2000) Human auditory fast and slow omitted stimulus potential and steady-state responses. Int J Neurosci 100:1–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liguori A, D’Agostino RB Jr, Dworkin SI, Edwards D, Robinson JH (1999) Alcohol effects on mood, equilibrium and simulated driving. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23:815–821

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1985) Alcohol-induced impairment of central nervous system function: behavioral skills involved in driving. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 10:109–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz H (1984) Attention tasks as skills performance measure of drug effects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 18:51S–61S

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramón F, Hernández OH, Bullock TH (2001) Event-related potentials in an invertebrate: crayfish emit “omitted stimulus potentials”. J Exp Biol 204:4291–4300

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raynor AJ (1998) Fractionated reflex and reaction time in children with developmental coordination disorder. Motor Control 2:114–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons RW, Wass T, Thomas JD, Riley EP (2002) Fractionated simple and choice reaction time in children with prenatal exposure to alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 26:1412–1419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Selst M, Jolicoeur P (1994) A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Q J Exp Psychol 47:631–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel-Sprott M, Fillmore MT (1993) Impairment and recovery under repeated doses of alcohol: effects of response-outcomes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 45:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welford AT (1952) The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high speed performance: a review and a theory. Br J Psychol 43:2–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack M (1999) Reinforcement of a behavioral standard modifies individual differences under alcohol. J Stud Alcohol 60:675–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by a grant to the first author from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT-J200.685/2004) and by the Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, México.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar H. Hernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernández, O.H., Vogel-Sprott, M., Huchín-Ramirez, T.C. et al. Acute dose of alcohol affects cognitive components of reaction time to an omitted stimulus: differences among sensory systems. Psychopharmacology 184, 75–81 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0237-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0237-7

Keywords

Navigation