A procedure to produce high alcohol intake in mice
While prolonged access to ethanol (EtOH), or deprivations, or their combination have occasionally been shown to yield high levels of voluntary self-administration, in almost all cases, rodents do not self-administer alcohol to the degree that they will develop substantial, intoxicating blood alcohol levels and then continue to self-administer at these levels.
The purpose of the present series of experiments was to modify a fluid restriction procedure to demonstrate consistent, high EtOH consumption.
Male and female mice from an alcohol preferring inbred strain (C57BL/6J; B6) as well as from a genetically heterogeneous strain (WSC) were given varying periods of access to fluid, ranging from 90 min to 10 h per day, for 12–21 days. Every 3rd or 4th day, separate groups of mice were offered a 5, 7 or 10% EtOH solution for either 10 min or 30 min, followed by water for the remainder of the time.
In all studies, stable high EtOH doses were consumed by both B6 and WSC mice across the EtOH sessions, exceeding 2 g/kg in a 30-min session. Mean blood EtOH concentration exceeded 1 mg/ml (i.e. 100 mg%), with values in individual animals ranging from 0.6 mg/ml to 3.4 mg/ml. Notably, mice receiving 10 h of fluid/day continued to consume 2 g/kg doses of EtOH. While this procedure did not produce subsequent preference for EtOH in WSC mice, consumption remained high in some animals.
These data indicate that scheduling fluid intake produces high, stable EtOH consumption and BEC in male and female B6 and WSC mice.
KeywordsEthanol consumption Genetically heterogeneous mice C57BL/6 Blood ethanol concentration Intoxication
- Belknap JK, Coleman RR, Foster K (1978) Alcohol consumption and sensory threshold differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice. Physiol Psychol 6:71–74Google Scholar
- Lester D (1961) Self-maintenance of intoxication in the rat. Q J Stud Alcohol 122:223–231Google Scholar
- Rolls BJ, Wood RJ, Rolls ET (1980) Thirst: the initiation, maintenance, and termination of drinking. Prog Psychobiol Physiol Psychol 9:263–321Google Scholar
- Toth LA, Gardiner TW (2000) Food and water restriction protocols: physiological and behavioral considerations. Contemp Top 39:9–17Google Scholar