Skip to main content
Log in

Abuse liability and stimulant properties of dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine combinations in rats

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The abuse of over-the-counter (OTC) medications has been widely reported. However, there are few preclinical studies examining the behavioral effects of OTC medications at higher, abused doses.

Objectives

The objectives of the current study were to determine whether the anti-histamine diphenhydramine (DIP) and the antitussive dextromethorphan (DEX), either alone or in combination, would have stimulant properties and be self-administered in animals.

Methods

For drug self-administration, naive rats with no history of exposure to other drugs were trained to self-administer IV DEX+DIP (0.5+0.5, 1+1 or 2+2 mg/kg per injection), DEX alone (1 mg/kg) or DIP (1 mg/kg) alone under five-response fixed-ratio (FR) schedule with a 30-s time-out after each injection in 2-h sessions 3–5 days a week. Separate groups of rats were tested on locomotor activity. After 8 consecutive days of habituation, naive rats were injected with 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg DEX or DIP alone IP, or in combination of 3+3 mg/kg, 10+10 mg/kg, or 30+30 mg/kg DEX+DIP IP. Saline was injected IP during the intervening days. Locomotor activity was measured for each session.

Results

DEX+DIP combinations were self-administered, but the drugs alone were not. The acquisition of DEX+DIP self-administration was rapid with a majority of rats reaching the final FR5 schedule in 22–23 sessions. The total IV combination dose for each final scheduled session ranged from 40 mg/kg to 160 mg/kg DEX+DIP. Significant increases in locomotor activity were observed for DIP, an effect that was significantly enhanced when DIP was given in combination with DEX. Significant mortality was also observed for the drug combination at each dose tested when given IV, with the highest mortality following the highest dose (2+2 mg/kg). When given IP, no mortality was observed.

Conclusions

These results show that combinations of DEX and DIP have stimulant properties and are self-administered by animals. Abuse of this combination in humans would be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abekawa T, Ohmori T, Ito K, Koyama T (2000) D1 dopamine receptor activation reduces extracellular glutamate and GABA concentrations in the medial prefrontal cortex. Brain Res 867:250–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Adriani W, Felici A, Sargolini F, Roullet P, Usiello A, Oliverio A, Mele A (1998) N-Methyl-d-aspartate and dopamine receptor involvement in the modulation of locomotor activity and memory processes. Exp Brain Res 123:52–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley PM, Balster RL (1992) The intravenous self-administration of antihistamines by rhesus monkeys. Drug Alcohol Depend 30:117–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman J, Spealman RD (1986) Some behavioral effects of histamine H1 antagonists in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 239:104–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cranston JW, Yoast R (1999) Abuse of dextromethorphan. Arch Family Med 8:99–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dringenberg HC, de Souza-Silva MA, Schwarting RKW, Huston JP (1998) Increased levels of extracellular dopamine in neostriatum and nucleus accumbens after histamine H1 receptor blockade. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 358:423–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott K, Hynansky A, Inturrisi CE (1994) Dextromethorphan attenuates and reverses analgesic tolerance to morphine. Pain 59:361–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti N, Ghelardini C, Bartolini A (1999) The role of potassium channels in antihistamine analgesia. Neuropharmacology 38:1893–1901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner DM, Kutcher S (1993) Dimenhydrinate abuse among adolescents. Can J Psychiatry 38:114–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvin DV, Vanecek SA, Baird TJ, Valett M, Briscoe RJ, Carl KL, Holloway FA, Sannerud CA (1998) The stimulus properties of two common over-the-counter drug mixtures: dextromethorphan+ephedrine and dextromethorphan+diphenhydramine. J Psychopharmacol 12:84–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpert AG, Olmstead MC, Beninger RJ (2002) Mechanisms and abuse liability of the anti-histamine dimenhydrinate. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamelin BA, Bouayad A, Drolet B, Gravel A, Turgeon J (1998) In vitro characterization of cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibition by classic histamine H1 receptor antagonists. Drug Metab Dispos 26:536–539

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart CL, Haney M, Foltin RW, Fischman MW (2002) Effects of the NMDA antagonist memantine on human methamphetamine discrimination. Psychopharmacology 164:376–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez SC, Bertolino M, Xiao Y, Pringle KE, Caruso FS, Kellar JK (2000) Dextromethorphan and its metabolite dextrorphan block α3β4 neuronal nicotinic receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 293:962–967

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR (2000) Abuse potential of morphine/dextromethorphan combination. J Pain Symptom Manage 19:S26–S30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jun JH, Schindler CW (2000) Dextromethorphan alters methamphetamine self-administration in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 67:405–409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo CC, Huang RC, Lou BS (2000) Inhibition of Na+ current by diphenhydramine and other diphenyl compounds: molecular determination of selective binding to the inactivated channels. Mol Pharmacol 57:135–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masukawa Y, Suzuki T, Misawa M (1993) Differential modification of the rewarding effects of methamphetamine and cocaine by opioids and antihistamines. Psychopharmacology 111:139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathe JM, Nomikos GG, Hildebrand BE, Hertel P, Svensson TH (1996) Prazosin inhibits MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Eur J Pharmacol 309:1–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga K, Sato T, Shuto H, Tsuruta Y, Suemaru K, Gomita Y, Oishi R (1998) Inhibition of neuronal dopamine uptake by some antiallergic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 350:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan DT, Larsen H (1997) NR1 and NR2 subunit contributions to N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor channel blocker pharmacology. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 280:614–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray S, Brewerton T (1993) Abuse of over-the-counter dextromethorphan by teenagers. S Med J 86:1151–1153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

  • Newman AH, Shah JH, Izenwasser S, HJeller B, Mattson M, Tortella FC (1996) Highly selective s1 ligands based on dextromethorphan. Med Chem Res 6:102–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson KL, Hayes B, Balster RL (1999) Evaluation of the reinforcing properties and phencyclidine-like discriminative stimulus effects of dextromethorphan and dextrorphan in rats and rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 146:49–59

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan WC, Miller WR, Feeney DM (2000) Dextromethorphan abuse among young youth. Arch Fam Med 9:791–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plesan A, Hoffmann O, Xu XJ, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z (1999) Genetic differences in the antinociceptive effect of morphine and its potentiation by dextromethorphan in rats. Neurosci Lett 263:53–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popik P, Kozela E, Danysz W (2000) Clinically available NMDA receptor antagonists memantine and dextromethorphan reverse existing tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine in mice. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 361:425–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Privou C, Knoche A, Hasenohrl RU, Huston JP (1998) The H1- and H2-histamine blockers chlorpheniramine and ranitidine applied to the nucleus basalis magnocellularis region modulate anxiety and reinforcement related processes. Neuropharmacology 37:1019–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe C, Verjee Z, Koren G (1997) Adolescent dimenhydrinate abuse: resurgence of an old problem. J Adolesc Health 21:47–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma AN, Hexdall AH, Chang EK, Nelson LS, Hoffman RS (2003) Diphenhydramine-induced wide complex dysrhythmia responds to treatment with sodium bicarbonate. Am J Emerg Med 21:212–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoaib M, Shippenberg TS, Goldberg SR, Schindler CW (1995) Behavioral studies with the glycine partial agonist (+)-HA966 on cocaine induced locomotor activity and reinforcement. Behav Pharmacol 6:568–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanski R, Ladenheim B, Lee SH, Cadet JL, Goldberg SR (1999) Neuroadaptations in the dopaminergic system after active self-administration but not after passive administration of methamphetamine. Eur J Pharmacol 371:123–135

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmiller CL, Maisonneuve IM, Glick SD (2002) Effects of dextromethorphan on dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens: interactions with morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 74:803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern KN, Chait LD, Johanson C-E (1989) Reinforcing and subjective effect of oral tripelennamine in normal human volunteers. Behav Pharmacol 1:161–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CLJ, Hui FW, Hanig JP (1985) Effect of H1 blockers alone and in combination with morphine to produce antinociception in mice. Neuropharmacology 24:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki T, Mori T, Takamori K, Onodera K, Misawa M (1996) Effects of H(1)-antagonists on discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine in rats. Behav Pharmacol 7:111–118

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki T, Mori T, Tsuji M, Misawa M, Onodera K (1997) Generalization of d-, l- and dl-chlorpheniramine and zolantidine to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine. Behav Pharmacol 8:718–724

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Unterwald EM, Kucharski LT, Williams JE, Kornetsky C (1984) Tripelennamine: enhancement of brain-stimulation reward. Life Sci 34:149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ushijima I, Kobayashi T, Suetsugi M, Watanabe K, Yamada M, Yamaguchi K (1998) Cocaine: evidence for NMDA-, beta-carboline- and dopaminergic-mediated seizures in mice. Brain Res 797:347–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wauquier A, Niemegeers CJ (1981) Effects of chlorpheniramine, pyrilamine and astemizole on intracranial self-stimulation in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 72:245–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1992) SYSTAT: Statistics, Version 5.2. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, Ill.

  • Wise RA (1998) Drug-activation of brain reward pathways. Drug Alcohol Depend 51:13–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe TR, Caravati EM (1995) Massive dextromethorphan ingestion and abuse. Am J Emerg Med 13:174–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zawertailo LA, Kaplan HL, Busto U, Tyndale RF, Sellers E (1998) Psychotropic effects of dextromethorphan are altered by the CYP2D6 polymorphism: a pilot study. J Clin Psychopharmacol 18:332–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles W. Schindler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jun, J.H., Thorndike, E.B. & Schindler, C.W. Abuse liability and stimulant properties of dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine combinations in rats. Psychopharmacology 172, 277–282 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1650-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1650-4

Keywords

Navigation