Skip to main content

Some remarks on interpolation and best approximation

Abstract

Sufficient conditions are provided for establishing equivalence between best approximation error and projection/interpolation error in finite-dimensional vector spaces for general (semi)norms. The results are applied to several standard finite element spaces, modes of interpolation and (semi)norms, and a numerical study of the dependence on polynomial degree of constants appearing in our estimates is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Arnold, D.N.: Spaces of finite element differential forms. In: Brezzi, F., Colli-Franzone, P., Gianazza, U.P., Gilardi, G. (eds.) Analysis and Numerics of Partial Differential Equations, vol. 4, pp. 117–140. Springer, Milan (2013). doi:10.1007/978-88-470-2592-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bank, R.E.: Hierarchical bases and the finite element method. In: Acta numerica, 1996, Acta Numerica, vol. 5, pp. 1–43. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

  3. Bank, R.E., Yserentant, H.: A note on interpolation, best approximation, and the saturation property. Numer. Math. 131(1), 199–203 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00211-014-0687-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Brutman, L.: On the Lebesgue function for polynomial interpolation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 15(4), 694–704 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Carstensen, C., Gallistl, D., Gedicke, J.: Justification of the saturation assumption. Numer. Math. 134(1), 1–25 (2016). doi:10.1007/s00211-015-0769-7

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Demkowicz, L.F.: Polynomial exact sequences and projection-based interpolation with application to Maxwell equations. In: Boffi, D., Gastaldi, L. (eds.) Mixed Finite Elements, Compatibility Conditions, and Applications, vol. 1939, pp. 101–158. Springer, Berlin (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78319-0_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dörfler, W., Nochetto, R.H.: Small data oscillation implies the saturation assumption. Numer. Math. 91(1), 1–12 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Monk, P.: Finite Element Methods for Maxwell’s Equations. Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, New York (2003). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508885.001.0001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, S.J.: Lebesgue constants in polynomial interpolation. Ann. Math. Inform. 33, 109–123 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Tantardini, F., Veeser, A., Verfürth, R.: Robust localization of the best error with finite elements in the reaction–diffusion norm. Constr. Approx. 42(2), 313–347 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00365-015-9291-5

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Veeser, A.: Approximating gradients with continuous piecewise polynomial functions. Found. Comput. Math. 1–28 (2015). doi:10.1007/s10208-015-9262-z

  12. Wolfram Research Inc.: Mathematica 10.0 (2014)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey S. Ovall.

Additional information

R. E. Bank: The work of this author was supported by the National Science Foundation Under Contract DMS-1318480.

J. S. Ovall: The work of this author was supported by the National Science Foundation Under Contract DMS-1414365.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bank, R.E., Ovall, J.S. Some remarks on interpolation and best approximation. Numer. Math. 137, 289–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-017-0877-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00211-017-0877-7

Mathematics Subject Classification

  • 65N30
  • 65N15
  • 65N50