Skip to main content
Log in

Single versus intermittent cycle exposure effect of 6-mercaptopurine in juvenile Sprague–Dawley rat: a germ cell-specific mechanistic study

  • Research
  • Published:
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infertility is a frequent long-term adverse effect of cancer therapy for children. Compromised testicular functions in adolescence are frequent observations after chemotherapy and there are currently no well-established alternatives to avoid this damage. Antimetabolites such as 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) are used to treat a variety of cancer; however, its treatment-associated adverse effects on the male reproductive functions are overlooked. Here, the molecular processes underlying 6-MP-induced male germ cell damage in juvenile Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (3 weeks) have been investigated. Rats were administered with low (5 mg/kg), medium (10 mg/kg), and high (20 mg/kg) doses of 6-MP per orally either singly (1 week × 1 cycle) or intermittently (1 week treatment followed by 1 week remission period × 3 cycles). The toxicity was evaluated in terms of genotoxicity and testes- and sperm-related cellular and molecular parameters. Single cycle of exposure either produced mild or no toxic manifestations at the end of the 6th week. Intermittent cycles of exposure, particularly at the 10 and 20 mg/kg, decreased body and organ weights, increased micronucleated cells in the peripheral blood, induced oxidative/nitrosative stress, altered sperm chromatin quality, reduced serum testosterone and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, increased testicular structural aberrations, DNA damage, and apoptosis, and upregulated TNF-α expression and downregulated p-AMPK and β-catenin expressions. Conclusively, intermittent cycles of exposure at 10 and 20 mg/kg doses to the juvenile rats significantly induced oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and cellular and molecular perturbations in the testes and sperm of adult rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated in this study was reported in the paper.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the financial assistance received from the National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Mohali, Punjab, India, for carrying out the above experiments.

Funding

The work was supported by funding from the National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Mohali, India (Grant number NPLC-GBJ-(2022–2023)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AP conceived, conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. GBJ conceived the idea, reviewed the manuscript, and administered the project. Finally, the authors have read and approved the manuscript for publication. The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopabandhu Jena.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The animal experimentation protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC), NIPER, Mohali (approval number IAEC 20/07).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1684 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panghal, A., Jena, G. Single versus intermittent cycle exposure effect of 6-mercaptopurine in juvenile Sprague–Dawley rat: a germ cell-specific mechanistic study. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 397, 3155–3168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02797-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-023-02797-8

Keywords

Navigation