Abstract
Methotrexate is an anti-metabolite drug that is frequently used for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. This study is aimed at evaluating the bioequivalence of 2 methotrexate tablets (2.5 mg) under fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers. A single-center, randomized, open-label, two-drug, two-period, crossover, single-dose trial protocol was designed. Fifty-two healthy Chinese participants were enrolled and randomly classified into fasting (n = 26) and fed (n = 26) group. Fifty of them participated in the whole trial course. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were collected 1 h before and up to 24 h after drug administration. To evaluate the bioequivalence of test and reference tablets, PK parameters including maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) were calculated. Our data revealed that 90% CIs of geometric mean ratio of the test or reference drugs for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ fell within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (80–125%). Besides, it is worthwhile to mention that Cmax and Tmax in the fed group were lower than those in the fasting group. Interestingly, the absorption, measured by AUC, did not have significant difference in both groups. There were no suspected serious adverse reactions or serious adverse events over the entire trial. Our results demonstrated that the test and reference tablets were bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are availability from corresponding author upon reasonable request but remain subject to all applicable legal requirements to protect the confidentiality of the study participants’ personal information.
References
Alexander JL, Wilson ID, Teare J, Marchesi JR, Nicholson JK, Kinross JM (2017) Gut microbiota modulation of chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:356–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.20
Chan ES, Cronstein BN (2010) Methotrexate–how does it really work? Nat Rev Rheumatol 6:175–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2010.5
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0, 2017.
Cronstein BN (1997) The mechanism of action of methotrexate. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 23:739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70358-6
Cronstein BN (2005) Low-dose methotrexate: a mainstay in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Rev 57:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.57.2.3
Cronstein BN, Aune TM (2020) Methotrexate and its mechanisms of action in inflammatory arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 16:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0373-9
EMA, Assessment report: methotrexate (EB/OL), 2019. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/methotrexate-article-31-referral-public-assessment-report-emea/h/31/1463_en.pdf
Ercolini D, Fogliano V (2018) Food design to feed the human gut microbiota. J Agric Food Chem 66:3754–3758. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00456
Elkrief A, Derosa L, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G, Routy B (2019) The intimate relationship between gut microbiota and cancer immunotherapy. Gut Microbes 10:424–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2018.1527167
Fransen J, Creemers MC, Van Riel PL (2004) Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: agreement of the disease activity score (DAS28) with the ARA preliminary remission criteria. Rheumatology (oxford) 43:1252–1255. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh297
FDA, Guidance on Methotrexate Sodium (EB/OL), 2011–10. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/psg/Methotrexate%20Sodium_final_Oral%20tab_RLD%2008085_RC10-11.pdf
FDA, Xatmep® (Methotrexate oral solution) Clinical review(s) (EB/OL), 2017–03. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/008085s066lbl.pdf
FDA, METHOTREXATE 2.5 mg Label (EB/OL), DAVA Pharmaceuticals Inc, 2018. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2017/208400Orig1Orig2s000MedR.pdf
García-González CM, Baker J (2022) Treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: methotrexate and beyond. Curr Opin Pharmacol 64:102227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2022.102227
Gori S, Inno A, Belluomini L, Bocus P, Bisoffi Z, Russo A, Arcaro G (2019) Gut microbiota and cancer: how gut microbiota modulates activity, efficacy and toxicity of antitumoral therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 143:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.09.003
Hamilton RA, Kremer JM (1995) The effects of food on methotrexate absorption. J Rheumatol 22:630–632
Han M, Zhang N, Mao Y, Huang B, Ren M, Peng Z, Bai Z, Chen L, Liu Y, Wang S, Huang S, Cheng Z (2022) The potential of gut microbiota metabolic capability to detect drug response in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Front Microbiol 13:839015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.839015
Hossein D, Mehrdad H (2016) Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of methotrexate in human plasma studied by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 11:e36758
Kozloski GD, De Vito JM, Kisicki JC, Johnson JB (1992) The effect of food on the absorption of methotrexate sodium tablets in healthy volunteers. Arthritis Rheum 35:761–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780350708
Lopez-Olivo MA, Siddhanamatha HR, Shea B, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Suarez-Almazor ME (2014) Methotrexate for treating rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD000957. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000957.pub2.
Lucas CJ, Dimmitt SB, Martin JH (2019) Optimising low-dose methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis-A review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 85:2228–2234. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.14057
Madanat F, Awidi A, Shaheen O, Othman S, Al-Turk W (1987) Effects of food and gender on the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in children. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol 55:279–282
McInnes IB, Schett G (2017) Pathogenetic insights from the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 389:2328–2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31472-1
Melander A (1978) Influence of food on the bioavailability of drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 3:337–351. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-197803050-00001
MHRA, Public Assessment Report. Decentralised procedure. Methotrexate 2.5 mg, 10 mg tablets (EB/OL), 2001.
Schmidt LE, Dalhoff K (2002) Food-drug interactions. Drugs 62:1481–1502. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200262100-00005
Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB (2016) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 388:2023–2038. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8
van Riel PL, Renskers L (2016) The Disease Activity Score (DAS) and the Disease Activity Score using 28 joint counts (DAS28) in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 34:S40–S44
Yarris JP, Roy HAJ, Hertz MD, (1909–2002), (2003) The cure of choriocarcinoma and its impact on the development of chemotherapy for cancer. Gynecol Oncol 89:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00110-0
Yu J, Zhou P (2020) The advances of methotrexate resistance in rheumatoid arthritis. Inflammopharmacology 28:1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-020-00741-3
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank all participants and investigators.
Funding
This work received financial support from Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Tackling Program Joint Co-Construction Project (No. LHGJ20191332).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors participated in the research, bioanalysis process work. Xu Zuo and Xin Zhao lead the draft of manuscript, figures, and tables. Tiandong Zhang provided opinions in revision. All authors have approved the submission of this manuscript at current form. The authors declare that all data were generated in-house and that no paper mill was used.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
The study protocol and informed consent documents were approved by the Ethics Committee of Xinxiang Central Hospital (2019–072 and 2021–024).
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all participates.
Consent to publish
No identifying details in this manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zuo, X., Zhao, X. & Zhang, T. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of 2 oral formulations of methotrexate tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 396, 803–809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02337-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-022-02337-w