# Selberg’s orthonormality conjecture and joint universality of *L*-functions

- First Online:

- Received:
- Accepted:

- 486 Downloads

## Abstract

In the paper we introduce a new method how to use only an orthonormality relation of coefficients of Dirichlet series defining given *L*-functions from the Selberg class to prove joint universality.

### Keywords

Selberg class Selberg’s conjecture Joint universality### Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 11M41## 1 Introduction

*f*(

*s*) on a compact set with connected complement \(K\subset \{s\in \mathbb {C}:1/2<{\text {Re}}(s)<1\}\), analytic in the interior of

*K*, we have

*L*-functions from number theory. For example, a universality theorem is known for: Dirichlet

*L*-functions [22], Dedekind zeta functions (Reich 1980), Artin

*L*-functions (Bauer 2003),

*L*-functions associated with newforms (Laurinčikas et al. 2003), and many others. A quite general class of universal

*L*-functions with polynomial Euler product was introduced by Steuding [21], and recently, his result was generalized by Nagoshi and Steuding [17] to all

*L*-functions from the Selberg class with coefficients

*a*(

*n*) of Dirichlet series representation satisfying

*L*; here \(\pi (x)\), as usual, counts the number of primes not exceeding

*x*.

*L*(

*s*) defined by a Dirichlet series \(\sum _{n=1}^\infty a_L(n)n^{-s}\) in the half-plane \(\sigma :={\text {Re}}(s) > 1\) satisfying the following axioms:

- (i)
*Ramanujan hypothesis:*\(a_L(n)\ll _\varepsilon n^\varepsilon \) for every \(\varepsilon >0\); - (ii)
*analytic continuation:*there exists a non-negative integer \(m_L\) such that \((s-1)^{m_L}L(s)\) is an entire function of finite order; - (iii)
*functional equation:**L*(*s*) satisfies the following functional equationwhere$$\begin{aligned} \Lambda (s) = \theta \overline{\Lambda (1-\overline{s})}, \end{aligned}$$\(|\theta |=1\), \(Q,\lambda _j\in \mathbb {R}\), and \(\mu _j\in \mathbb {C}\) with \({\text {Re}}(\mu _j)\ge 0\);$$\begin{aligned} \Lambda (s):=L(s)Q^s\prod _{j=1}^k\Gamma (\lambda _js+\mu _j), \end{aligned}$$ - (iv)
*Euler product:*for \(\sigma >1\) we havewhere \(b_L(p^k)\) are complex numbers satisfying \(b_L(p^k)\ll p^{k\theta }\) for some \(\theta <1/2\).$$\begin{aligned} \log L(s) = \sum _p\sum _{k=1}^\infty \frac{b_L(p^k)}{p^{ks}}, \end{aligned}$$

*L*defined by \(2\sum _{j=1}^k\lambda _j\), where \(\lambda _j\)’s are given by the functional equation of

*L*. Therefore, it is natural that Nagoshi’s and Steuding’s universality theorem of

*L*-function from the Selberg class was proved only in the strip \(\{s\in \mathbb {C}:\sigma _{m }(L)<{\text {Re}}(s)<1\}\), where \(\sigma _{m }(L)\) denotes the abscissa of the mean-square half-plane for

*L*.

Voronin [23] (see also [9, Chapter VII, Theorem 3.2.1]) proved also the so-called joint universality theorem for Dirichlet *L*-functions associated with pairwise non-equivalent Dirichlet characters. Roughly speaking, he proved that any collection of analytic non-vanishing functions \(f_1,f_2,\ldots , f_n\) can be approximated, in the Voronin sense, by the shift \(L(s+i\tau ;\chi _1), L(s+i\tau ;\chi _2),\ldots ,L(s+i\tau ;\chi _n)\), where \(\chi _1,\ldots ,\chi _n\) are pairwise non-equivalent Dirichlet characters. Joint universality was also proved for many other zeta and *L*-functions from number theory. However, it is still open problem put forward by Steuding [21], whether a collection of *L*-functions from Selberg class is jointly universal under the assumption of the following so-called Selberg’s orthonormality conjecture, which is widely believed to be true in the Selberg class.

### Conjecture 1.1

The last equation can be called the orthonormality relation.

*L*-functions under a stronger version of Selberg’s conjecture. Moreover, it is known that Selberg’s conjecture with \(R(x)\ll 1\) is not sufficient to prove joint universality. The second author in [15, Example 7.5] observed that, for non-principle Dirichlet character \(\chi \), the Dirichlet

*L*-functions \(L(s,\chi )\) and \(L(s-i,\chi )\) cannot be jointly universal, whereas it is easy to observe that

*L*-functions with Euler product. In order to illustrate this idea we prove a general joint universality theorem for any collection of

*L*-functions \(L_1,\ldots ,L_m\) from the Selberg class satisfying some stronger analogue of Selberg’s conjecture, namely

*L*-functions.

Although the above formulas are obviously stronger than the original Selberg’s conjecture, it is quite likely that they are fulfilled by all *L*-functions. We refer to Sect. 4 for a detailed discussion of this matter, where several unconditional joint universality theorems for automorphic *L*-functions are deduced from our method. Here we only mention that the evidence for the truth of this conjecture is the fact that there is a grand hypothesis that each *L*-function from Selberg class can be defined as a suitable automorphic *L*-function and, so far, all automorphic *L*-functions satisfying Selberg’s conjecture fulfill in fact (4) and (5).

### Theorem 1.2

Noteworthy is the fact that most of proofs of universality rely on periodicity and orthonormality property of coefficients of *L*-functions. Recently, Mishou [14] invented a new approach to prove joint universality without periodicity, which works for a pair of *L*-functions with real coefficients under the assumption of some analogue of (4) and (5). The purpose of this paper is to introduce another new approach how to use only orthonormality relation to prove joint universality for any collection of *L*-functions with complex coefficients. It should be noted here that Mishou’s result was formulated in the language of automorphic *L*-functions, which belong to the Selberg class only conjecturally. Nevertheless, one can easily compare his result to Theorem 1.2 and notice that the essential difference is that our approach works even for more than two *L*-functions and, moreover, it does not require the assumption that coefficients of Dirichlet series defining given *L*-functions are real.

This method can be easily generalized to other zeta and *L*-functions, which joint universality property relies on some independence of coefficients of Dirichlet series representation. For example, in [11] the authors proved joint universality for a collection of Lerch zeta functions \(L(s;\alpha ,\lambda _j) = \sum _{n=0}^\infty \frac{\exp (2\pi i\lambda _j)}{(n+\alpha )^s}\), \(j=1,2,\ldots ,m\), associated to transcendental \(\alpha \in (0,1]\) and distinct \(\lambda _j\)’s with \(\lambda _j\in (0,1]\).

As standard consequences of universality, one can easily prove the following corollaries. For the proofs we refer, for example, to [14, Section 8], where Mishou showed similar results for a pair of *L*-functions. However, the modifications needed are straightforward and can be left to the reader (see [21, Section 10]).

### Corollary 1.3

Moreover, the function *L*(*s*) has infinitely many zeros in the strip \(\sigma _L<\sigma <1\), namely for any \(\sigma _1,\sigma _2\) with \(\sigma _L<\sigma _1<\sigma _2<1\) and sufficiently large *T* there exist \(\gg T\) zeros \(\rho =\beta +i\gamma \) of *L*(*s*) in the rectangle \(\sigma _1\le \beta \le \sigma _2\), \(0\le \gamma \le T\).

### Corollary 1.4

### Corollary 1.5

## 2 A denseness lemma

Let us fix *L*-functions \(L_1,\ldots ,L_m\in {\mathcal {S}}\) and compact sets \(K_1,\ldots ,K_m\subset \{s\in \mathbb {C}:\max _{j=1,2,\ldots ,m}{\sigma _{m }(L_j)}<{\text {Re}}s< 1\}\). Take \(\sigma _1>\max _{j=1,2,\ldots ,m}\{\sigma _{m }(L_j)\}\) and \(\sigma _2<1\) such that \(K_j\), \(j=1,2,\ldots ,m\), are the subset of the strip \(D:=\{s\in \mathbb {C}:\sigma _1<{\text {Re}}s< \sigma _2\}\) and denote the space of analytic functions on *D* equipped with the topology of uniform convergence on compacta by *H*(*D*).

Then, the main purpose of this section is to prove the so-called denseness lemma in the space \(H(D)^m\), which plays a crucial role in the proof of universality and says that any collection of analytic functions from \(H(D)^m\) can be approximated by given *L*-functions \(L_1,\ldots ,L_m\) twisted by certain sequence of complex numbers with absolute value 1.

In order to show it, let \(\gamma :=\{s\in \mathbb {C}: |s|=1\}\) and \(\Omega :=\prod _{p}\gamma _p\) be an infinite-dimensional torus with product topology and pointwise multiplication, where \(\gamma _p=\gamma \) for each prime *p*. It is well known that \(\Omega \) is a compact topological abelian group, so there is a normalized Haar measure \(m_H\) on \((\Omega ,\mathcal {B}(\Omega ))\), where \(\mathcal {B}(\Omega )\) denotes the class of Borel sets of \(\Omega \).

### Proposition 2.1

*U*be a bounded simply connected smooth Jordan domain satisfying \(\overline{U}\subset D\) and \(K_j\subset U\) for every \(j=1,2,\ldots ,m\). Let \(L^2(U)\) be the complex Hilbert space of all square integrable complex functions on

*U*with the inner product

*H*(

*D*) in \(L^2(U)\). Then \(H_1^m\) is the complex Hilbert space with the inner product given, for \(\underline{f}=(f_1,\ldots ,f_m)\) and \(\underline{g}=(g_1,\ldots ,g_m)\), by

*v*be a sufficiently large number such that

*f*|| and \(s\in U\) we have \(|f(s)|<\frac{||f||}{\sqrt{\pi }{\text {dist}}(s,\partial {U})}\) (see for example [6, Chapter I, Section 1, Lemma 1]) clearly implies that the approximation with respect to the norm \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) in \(H_1\) gives the uniform approximation on every compact subset

*K*of

*U*. Hence, from the fact that the set (6) is dense in \(H_1^m\), we obtain that, for every \(\underline{f}=(f_1,\ldots ,f_m)\in H(D)^m\), there exists a sequence \(\omega '(p)\) such that

### Lemma 2.2

*H*be a complex Hilbert space. Assume that a sequence \(u_n\in H\), \(n\in \mathbb {N}\), is such that

- (i)
the series \(\sum _n ||u_n||^2< \infty \);

- (ii)
for any element \(0\ne e\in H\) the series \(\sum _n |\langle u_n,e\rangle |\) is divergent.

*H*.

### Proof

This is [21, Theorem 5.4].

### Lemma 2.3

Before we prove the above lemma, we need to obtain good estimation for \(\Delta (\log p)=\iint _U p^{-s}\overline{g(s)}d\sigma dt\), where *g*(*s*) is a given non-zero element of \(H_1\). In order to prove it we use Markov’s inequality.

### Lemma 2.4

*P*(

*t*) is a polynomial of degree

*n*with real coefficients, which satisfies

### Proof

For a proof see for example [1]. \(\square \)

### Corollary 2.5

*P*(

*s*) be polynomial of degree

*n*with complex coefficients. Then for every

*a*,

*b*with \(a<b\) and every real \(t\in [a,b]\) we have

### Proof

### Lemma 2.6

*g*be a Lebesgue square integrable function on

*U*. For \(z\in \mathbb {C}\) we put

### Proof

### Corollary 2.7

*U*. For \(z\in \mathbb {C}\) we put

### Proof

### Proof of Lemma 2.3

Without loss of generality we can assume that \(g_1\) is a non-zero element, since the fact that \(\underline{g}\ne 0\) implies that at least one of \(g_j\)’s is a non-zero element.

*C*depending on

*U*. Let us recall that for all \(s\in U\) we have \(1/2<\sigma _1<{\text {Re}}s< \sigma _2<1\). Then for sufficiently small \(\eta =\eta (U)>0\) and for all complex

*z*with \(|\arg (-z)|\le \eta \) we have

*k*we have \(0 = \Delta _1^{(k)}(0) = \iint _U (-s)^k \overline{g_1(s)}d\sigma dt\), which means that \(g_1\) is orthogonal to all polynomials in \(L_2(U)\) and we get contradiction to the fact that \(g_1\) is a non-zero element and the linear space of polynomials is dense in the Bergman space \(H_1\) (see for example [19, Theorem 7.2.2]). Hence, by [8, Lemma 3], which proof based on the Phragmén-Lindelöf theorem, there is a real sequence \(x_k\) tending to \(\infty \) such that

*k*and put \(x=x_k\). Hence, using Corollary 2.7, for every \(A>0\) and \(x=x_k\) there exist \(B_1>\cdots>B_m>0\), \(x^{(0)}_0=x, x^{(1)}_0,\ldots , x^{(m)}_0\) and intervals \(I_j\subset [x,x+1]\) of length \(|I_j|\ge \frac{B_j}{x^{2j}}\) such that \(x^{(j)}_0\in I_j\), \(I_{j+1}\subset I_j\), and for all \(\xi \in I_{j}\) we have

*p*we have \(\log p\in I\).

## 3 Proof of Theorem 1.2

Now we shall use the denseness lemma proved above, to give the proof of joint universality for a collection of *L*-functions \(L_1,\ldots ,L_m\) from the Selberg class. In order to do it we need a joint limit theorem for the following probabilistic measure on \((H(D)^m,\mathcal {B}(H(D)^m))\), where \(\mathcal {B}(H(D)^m)\) denotes the class of Borel sets of \(H(D)^m\). Basically, the proof of the joint limit theorem and the remaining steps of the proof of Theorem 1.2 are based on [21, Chapter 12], where Steuding proved conditional joint universality (see [21, Theorem 12.5]) for a slightly different class of *L*-functions. The modification needed are easy and straightforward. Nevertheless, we give a sketch of the proof for sake of completeness.

### Theorem 3.1

[21, Theorem 12.1] For \(L_1,\ldots ,L_m\in {\mathcal {S}}\) the probability measure \(\mathbf {P}_T^{\underline{L}}\) converges weakly to \(\mathbf {P}^{\underline{L}}\), as \(T\rightarrow \infty \).

The immediate consequence of the above theorem is the following result.

### Corollary 3.2

Hence, in order to prove Theorem 1.2 it remains to determine the support of the measure \(\mathbf {Q}_T^{\underline{L}}\), which is implied by Hurwitz’s classical result on zeros of uniformly convergent sequence of functions. Let us recall that the support of the probabilistic space \((S,\mathcal {B}(S),\mathbf {P})\) is the minimal closed set with measure 1. It means that the support consists of all elements \(x\in S\) satisfying \(\mathbf {P}(V)>0\) for every neighborhood *V* of *x*. By using (7), [21, Lemma 12.7] and the definition of support, and modifying the proof of [21, Lemma 12.6], we have the following lemma.

### Lemma 3.3

Now, we are ready to complete the proof of Theorem 1.2.

### Proof of Theorem 1.2

## 4 Examples

In this section we give examples of *L*-functions from analytic number theory satisfying Selberg’s conjecture, and, particularly, the assumptions of Theorem 1.2.

*L*-function

*L*(

*s*) from the Selberg class. In this case, it suffices to assume that

*L*(

*s*) satisfies (4) and

*L*(

*s*). For example, [7, Theorem 5.13] states that the prime number theorem for general

*L*-function holds under the assumption of existence of the zero-free region. More precisely, one can deduce that for any function \(1\ne L\in {\mathcal {S}}\) with polynomial Euler product we have

*L*-function from the Selberg class with zero-free region of the form (12). It means that, for example, we can show \(\zeta (s)\) and any Hecke

*L*-function \(L_{\mathbf {K}}(s;\chi )\) associated to a finite extension \(\mathbf {K}\) of \(\mathbb {Q}\) and a non-principle primitive grössencharacker \(\chi \) are jointly universal in the strip \(\sigma _{m }(L_{\mathbf {K}}(s;\chi ))<\sigma <1\). Similarly, we can show that the Riemann zeta function and Artin

*L*-function associated to a finite Galois extension are jointly universal. The last example of this kind can be delivered by the theory of classical automorphic

*L*-functions. For instance, the normalized

*L*-function

*L*(

*s*,

*f*) associated to holomorphic primitive cusp form. Here, we refer to Iwaniec and Kowalski [7, Chapter 5] for the proofs of needed prime number theorems for Hecke, Artin and automorphic

*L*-functions and more examples of

*L*-functions jointly universal with the Riemann zeta function.

*L*-function

*L*(

*s*) with a pole at \(s=1\) of order \(m_L\) satisfying \(0<m_L<d_L\). Then it turns out that instead of (5) it suffices to assume the truth of Selberg’s conjecture (3) with \(R(x)\ll 1\) and the existence of a zero-free region for

*L*(

*s*). Indeed, it is well known (see [4] or [5, Theorem 2.4.1]) that every function in \({\mathcal {S}}\) can be factored into primitive elements. Let us recall that \(F\in {\mathcal {S}}\) is primitive if \(F=F_1F_2\) for \(F_1,F_2\in {\mathcal {S}}\) implies \(F_1=1\) or \(F_2=1\). Furthermore, Selberg’s conjecture (3) with \(R(x)\ll 1\) implies that the Riemann zeta function is the only primitive element of \({\mathcal {S}}\) with a pole (see [4] or [5, Theorem 2.5.2]). More precisely, under Selberg’s Conjeture 1.1, every given function \(L\in {\mathcal {S}}\) with a pole at \(s=1\) of order \(m_L\) can be factored into \(m_L\)-th power of \(\zeta (s)\) and an entire function from \({\mathcal {S}}\). Therefore, assuming (12) for a given \(L\in {\mathcal {S}}\) with \(0<m_L<d_L\) and recalling again [7, Theorem 5.13] gives that we can factor

*L*(

*s*) into \(\zeta (s)^{m_L}\) and an entire function \(1\ne L^*(s)\in {\mathcal {S}}\), which, obviously, has no zeros at least in the same region as

*L*(

*s*) and satisfies (5). Moreover, \(L^*\) satisfies (4) as

*L*does, since one can easily observe that Selberg’s conjecture (3) with \(R(x)\ll 1\) gives

*L*(

*s*) are jointly universal in the same strip, provided

*L*(

*s*) satisfies (4), (12) and Selberg’s conjecture (3) holds for every

*L*-function with \(R(x)\ll 1\).

As an example of application of this observation, we can consider Dedekind zeta function \(\zeta _{\mathbf {K}}(s)\) associated to any algebraic number field \(\mathbf {K}\). Then it is known that (12), (4) and (5) hold for any algebraic number field (cf. [7, Section 5.10]). Hence, \(\zeta _{\mathbf {K}}\) can be written as \(\zeta (s)L^*(s)\), which implies the joint universality theorem for \(\zeta (s)\) and \(\zeta _{\mathbf {K}}(s)\) in the strip \(\sigma _{m }(L^*)<\sigma <1\) under the assumption of Selberg’s orthonormality conjecture.

*L*-functions of smaller degree \(d_L\), namely [21, Corollary 6.11] says that \(\sigma _{m }(L)<\max (\frac{1}{2},1-\frac{1}{d_L})\). Therefore, the above approach by factorization of

*L*-function usually gives universality for a wider strip than the direct proof of joint universality for given

*L*-functions. For example, following [14, Section 2] let us consider a normalized holomorphic Hecke eigen cusp form

*f*, the automorphic

*L*-function

*L*(

*s*,

*f*) and the symmetric square

*L*-function \(L(s,sym ^2f)\) (for the definition see [14, Eq. (2.4) and (2.6)]). It is known that the Rankin-Selberg

*L*-function \(L(s,f\otimes g)\) is a function of degree 4 and it is universal (see [13] and [16]) in the strip \(3/4<\sigma <1\). However, one can easily show that

*L*-function in the wider strip \(2/3<\sigma <1\).

*L*-functions. For example, Iwaniec and Kowalski [7, Section 5] showed that the existence of the Rankin-Selberg

*L*-function \(L(s,f\otimes g)\) implies the existence of its zero-free region, provided some additional conditions related to automorphic forms

*f*,

*g*hold. Moreover, they proved that zero-free region for automorphic

*L*-function gives prime number theorem (see [7, Theorem 5.13]). Note that the coefficients \(\lambda _{f\otimes g}(p)\) of the Rankin-Selberg convolution \(L(s,f\otimes g)\) satisfy \(\lambda _{f\otimes g}(p) = \lambda _f(p)\lambda _g(p)\), where \(\lambda _f(p)\) and \(\lambda _g(p)\) are coefficients of automorphic

*L*-functions

*L*(

*s*,

*f*) and

*L*(

*s*,

*g*) associated to automorphic forms

*f*and

*g*, respectively. In particular, the coefficients of the Rankin-Selberg square \(L(s,f\otimes \overline{f})\) satisfy \(\lambda _{f\otimes \overline{f}}(p) = |\lambda _f(p)|^2\). Therefore, we obtain that the existence of the Rankin-Selberg convolution and the Rankin-Selberg square implies the strong version of Selberg’s conjecture, namely

*L*-functions. For example, it is known (see [7, Theorem 5.41]) that \(L(s,f\otimes g)\) has no zero in the region (12) except possibly a one simple zero \(\beta <1\), provided

*f*and

*g*are classical primitive modular forms. Hence, we get that (13) and (14) hold and we get joint universality for any collection of automorphic

*L*-function \(L(s,f_1),\ldots ,L(s,f_m)\) with distinct classical primitive modular forms, provided they belong to \({\mathcal {S}}\).

Similarly, the result of Liu and Ye [12, Theorem 2.3] implies joint universality for a quite general automorphic *L*-functions \(L(s,\pi _j)\), \(j=1,2,\ldots ,m\), associated to irreducible unitary cuspidal representation \(\pi _j\) of \(GL_m(\mathbb {Q}_A)\) satisfying \(\pi _i\not \cong \pi _j\otimes |\det |^{i\tau }\) for any \(\tau \in \mathbb {R}\), provided they are elements of the Selberg class.

It should be noted that, most likely, the Selberg class consists only of automorphic *L*-functions in which case it is widely believed and known for many examples that instead of Selberg’s Conjecture 1.1 we can expect (13) and (14). It means that probably there is no example of *L*-functions from Selberg class satisfying Selberg’s Conjecture 1.1, which do not fulfill (4) and (5). Thus, we conjecture that we do not loss of generality by assuming the stronger version of Selberg’s conjecture.

### References

- 1.Achieser, N.I.: Letures on the Theory of Approximation. Frederick Ungar Publishing Company, New York (1956)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bauer, H.: The value distribution of Artin L-series and zeros of zeta-functions. J. Number Theory
**98**, 254–279 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 3.Bombieri, E., Hejhal, D.A.: On the distribution of zeros of linear combinations of Euler products. Duke Math. J.
**80**, 821–862 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 4.Conrey, J.B., Ghosh, A.: On the Selberg class of Dirichlet series: small degrees. Duke Math. J.
**72**, 673–693 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 5.Friedlander, J.B., Heath-Brown, D.R., Iwaniec, H., Kaczorowski, J., Analytic number theory. In: Perelli, A., Viola, C. (eds.) Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1891, Lectures from the C.I.M.E. Summer School held in Cetraro, July 11–18, 2002. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
- 6.Gaier, D.: Vorlesungen über Approximation im Komplexen. Birkhäuser, Basel (1980)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 7.Iwaniec, H., Kowalski, E.: Analytic Number Theory. American Mathematical Society, Colloquium Publications 53. AMS Providence, RI (2004)Google Scholar
- 8.Kaczorowski, J., Kulas, M.: On the non-trivial zeros off the critical line for L-functions from extended Selberg class. Mon. Math.
**150**, 217–232 (2007)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 9.Karatsuba, A.A., Voronin, S.M.: The Riemann Zeta Function. de Gruyter, Berlin (1992)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 10.Laurincǐkas, A., Matsumoto, K.: The universality of zeta-functions attached to certain cusp forms. Acta Arith.
**98**, 345–359 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 11.Lee, Y., Nakamura, T., Pańkowski, Ł.: Joint universality for Lerch zeta functions. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 2015 arXiv:1503.06001
- 12.Liu, J., Ye, Y.: Perron’s formula and the prime number theorem for automorphic \(L\)-functions. Pure. Appl. Math. Q.
**3**(2), 481–497 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 13.Matsumoto, K.: The mean values and the universality of Rankin–Selberg \(L\)-function. In: The Proceedings of the Turku Symposium in Number Theory in Memory of Kustaa Inkeri, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 201–221 (2001)Google Scholar
- 14.Mishou, H.: Joint universality theorems for pairs of automorphic zeta functions. Math. Z.
**277**, 1113–1154 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 15.Nakamura, T.: Joint value approximation and joint universality for several types of zeta functions. Acta Arith.
**134**(1), 67–82 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 16.Nagoshi, H.: Value-distribution of Rankin–Selberg \(L\)-functions. In: New Directions in Value-Distribution Theory of Zeta and L-functions: Proceedings of Würzburg Conference, October 6–10, 2008, pp. 275–287. Shaker Verlag (2009)Google Scholar
- 17.Nagoshi, H., Steuding, J.: Universality for \(L\)-functions in the Selberg class. Lith. Math. J.
**50**(3), 293–311 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 18.Potter, H.S.A.: The mean values of certain Dirichlet series I. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc.
**46**, 467–468 (1940)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 19.Queffélec, H., Queffélec, M.: Diophantine Approximation and Dirichlet Series. HRI Lecture Notes Series 2, AMS (2013)Google Scholar
- 20.Reich, A.: Werteverteilung von Zetafunktionen. Arch. Math.
**34**, 440–451 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 21.Steuding, J.: Value-Distribution of L-Functions. Springer, Berlin (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 22.Voronin, S.M.: Theorem on the universality of the Riemann zeta function, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser Mat
**39**, 475–486 (in Russian). Math. USSR Izv.**9**, 443–453 (1975)Google Scholar - 23.Voronin, S.M.: Analytic Properties of Dirichlet Generating Functions of Arithmetic Objects. Ph.D. Thesis, Moscow, Steklov Mathematical Institute (1977) (Russian)Google Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.