Abstract
Our first main result states that the spectral norm \(\gamma \) on \( \mathrm {Ham}(M, \omega ) \), introduced in the works of Viterbo, Schwarz and Oh, is continuous with respect to the \(C^0\) topology, when M is symplectically aspherical. This statement was previously proven only in the case of closed surfaces. As a corollary, using a recent result of KislevShelukhin, we obtain the \(C^0\) continuity of barcodes on aspherical symplectic manifolds, and furthermore define barcodes for Hamiltonian homeomorphisms. We also present several applications to Hofer geometry and dynamics of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms. Our second main result is related to the Arnold conjecture about fixed points of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms. The recent example of a Hamiltonian homeomorphism on any closed symplectic manifold of dimension greater than 2 having only one fixed point shows that the conjecture does not admit a direct generalization to the \( C^0 \) setting. However, in this paper we demonstrate that a reformulation of the conjecture in terms of fixed points as well as spectral invariants still holds for Hamiltonian homeomorphisms on symplectically aspherical manifolds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To be more precise, it is proven in [48] that the spectral norm is \(C^0\) continuous on surfaces.
To be more precise, a barcode is a multiset of intervals, i.e. a finite set of pairs (I, m), where I is an interval and m is a positive integer. However, to keep the exposition simple, we use the notation \(\{I_j\}_{1 \leqslant j \leqslant N}\), keeping in mind that the list of \(I_j\)’s may have repetitions.
Here, \(\cap \) refers to the intersection product in homology. Cup length can be equivalently defined in terms of the cup product in cohomology.
The original version of the Arnold conjecture, in which the lower bound for the number of fixed points is predicted to be the minimal number of critial points of a smooth function on M, has also been established on ashperical manifolds; see [44].
The set of spectral invariants of this Hamiltonian homeomorphism coincides with the spectral invariants of a \(C^2\)–small Morse function. Hence, their count is at least the cup length of the manifold. This is perhaps an indication that, on symplectic manifolds of dimension at least four, one cannot define the notion of action for fixed points of an arbitrary Hamiltonian homeomorphism. See Remark 20 in [2].
The original question was posed in the twodimensional setting, whence the use of the word “disk”.
The almost conjugacy relation may be characterized by the following universal property: \(\varphi \sim \psi \) if and only if \(f(\varphi ) = f(\psi )\) for any continuous function \(f: {\overline{\mathrm {Ham}}}(M, \omega ) \rightarrow Y\) such that f is invariant under conjugation and Y is a Hausdorff topological space.
A notion very closely related to that of almost conjugacy, called \(\chi \)–equivalence, arises naturally in the study of surface group actions on the circle; see [34] and references therein.
See [36] for the construction of these invariants on general symplectic manifolds.
Here, the subscript “LS” refers to “LusternikSchnirelman” since this quantity is related to the socalled LusternikSchnirelman theory; this is discussed in further details in Sect. 5.1.
To find such K, one can for instance take a sufficiently fine triangulation of M, and let K be the union of all topdimentional simplices that have nonempty intersection with \(f^{1}(\max (f))\).
By using the wellknown fact [45] that on a closed symplectically aspherical manifold, the action spectrum of a contractible normalized Hamiltonian loop is \( \{ 0 \} \).
By residual subset we mean a countable intersection of dense open subsets.
References
Buhovsky, L.: Towards the \(C^0\) flux conjecture. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 14(6), 3493–3508 (2014)
Buhovsky, L., Humilière, V., Seyfaddini, S.: A \(C^0\) counterexample to the Arnold conjecture. Invent. Math. 213(2), 759–809 (2018)
Buhovsky, L., Opshtein, E.: Some quantitative results in \(C^0\) symplectic geometry. Invent. Math 205(1), 1–56 (2016)
Chazal, F., de Silva, V., Glisse, M., Oudot, S.: The structure and stability of persistence modules. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics. Springer, [Cham], (2016)
Cornea, O., Lupton, G., Oprea, J., Tanré, D.: LusternikSchnirelmann category. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 103. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2003)
Dore, D.N., Hanlon, A.D.: Area preserving maps on \(S^2\): a lower bound on the \(C^0\)norm using symplectic spectral invariants. Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci. 20, 97–102 (2013)
Entov, M., Polterovich, L.: Rigid subsets of symplectic manifolds. Compos. Math. 145(3), 773–826 (2009)
Entov, M., Polterovich, L., Py, P.: On continuity of quasimorphisms for symplectic maps. In Perspectives in analysis, geometry, and topology, volume 296 of Progr. Math., pages 169–197. Birkhäuser/Springer, New York, (2012). With an appendix by Michael Khanevsky
Floer, A.: Symplectic fixed points and holomorphic spheres. Comm. Math. Phys. 120(4), 575–611 (1989)
Fortune, B.: A symplectic fixed point theorem for \({ C}{\rm P}^n\). Invent. Math. 81(1), 29–46 (1985)
Fortune, B., Weinstein, A.: A symplectic fixed point theorem for complex projective spaces. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.), 12(1), 128–130 (1985)
Franks, J.: Rotation vectors and fixed points of area preserving surface diffeomorphisms. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 348(7), 2637–2662 (1996)
Ginzburg, V.L.: The Conley conjecture. Ann. of Math. (2) 172(2), 1127–1180 (2010)
Glasner, E., Weiss, B.: The topological Rohlin property and topological entropy. Am. J. Math. 123(6), 1055–1070 (2001)
Glasner, E., Weiss, B.: Topological groups with Rokhlin properties. Colloq. Math. 110(1), 51–80 (2008)
Guihéneuf, P.: Ensemble des points périodiques d’un homéomorphisme générique. Available at: webusers.imjprg.fr/ pierreantoine.guiheneuf/Fichiers/PerGeneHom.pdf, (2013)
Hatcher, A.: Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Hingston, N.: Subharmonic solutions of Hamiltonian equations on tori. Ann. Math. (2) 170(2), 529–560 (2009)
Hofer, H.: LusternikSchnirelmantheory for Lagrangian intersections. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 5(5), 465–499 (1988)
Hofer, H.: On the topological properties of symplectic maps. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 115(1–2), 25–38 (1990)
Howard, W.: Action Selectors and the Fixed Point Set of a Hamiltonian Diffeomorphism. ArXiv: 1211.0580, Nov. (2012)
Humilière, V., Leclercq, R., Seyfaddini, S.: Coisotropic rigidity and \(C^0\)symplectic geometry. Duke Math. J. 164(4), 767–799 (2015)
Humilière, V., Leclercq, R., Seyfaddini, S.: Reduction of symplectic homeomorphisms. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 49(3), 633–668 (2016)
Katok, A., Hasselblatt, B.: Introduction to the modern theory of dynamical systems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
Kawamoto, Y.: On \(C^0\)continuity of the spectral norm on nonsymplectically aspherical manifolds. arXiv:1905.07809, May (2019)
Kislev, A., Shelukhin, E.: Bounds on spectral norm and barcodes. arXiv:1810.09865, Oct (2018)
Lalonde, F., McDuff, D.: The geometry of symplectic energy. Ann. Math. (2) 141(2), 349–371 (1995)
Lalonde, F., McDuff, D., Polterovich, L.: On the flux conjectures. In: Geometry, topology, and dynamics (Montreal, PQ, 1995), volume 15 of CRM Proc. Lecture Notes, pp. 69–85. Am. Math. Soc, Providence, RI (1998)
Le Calvez, P.: Une version feuilletée équivariante du théorème de translation de Brouwer. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 102, 1–98 (2005)
Le Calvez, P.: Periodic orbits of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms of surfaces. Duke Math. J. 133(1), 125–184 (2006)
Le Roux, F.: Six questions, a proposition and two pictures on Hofer distance for Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms on surfaces. In Symplectic topology and measure preserving dynamical systems, volume 512 of Contemp. Math., pages 33–40. Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2010)
Le Roux, F., Seyfaddini, S., Viterbo, C.: Barcodes and areapreserving homeomorphisms. arXiv:1810.03139, to appear in Geometry and Topology
Lusternik, L., Schnirelmann, L.: Méthodes topologiques dans les problèmes variationnels, p. 1930. Issledowatelskij Institut Mathematiki i Mechaniki pri J. M. G. U, Moskau (1930)
Mann, K., Wolff, M.: Rigidity of mapping class group actions on \(S^1\). Geom. Topol. 24(3), 1211–1223 (2020)
Matsumoto, S.: Arnold conjecture for surface homeomorphisms. In Proceedings of the FrenchJapanese Conference Hyperspace Topologies and Applications (La Bussière, 1997), volume 104, pages 191–214, (2000)
Oh, Y.G.: Construction of spectral invariants of hamiltonian paths on closed symplectic manifolds. The breadth of symplectic and Poisson geometry. Progr. Math. 232, Birkhauser, Boston, pages 525–570, (2005)
Oh, Y.G.: Lectures on Floer theory and spectral invariants of Hamiltonian flows. In Morse theoretic methods in nonlinear analysis and in symplectic topology, volume 217 of NATO Sci. Ser. II Math. Phys. Chem., pages 321–416. Springer, Dordrecht, (2006)
Oh, Y.G.: The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms and continuous hamiltonian flows. In Symplectic topology and measure preserving dynamical systems, volume 512 of Contemp. Math., pages 149–177. Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (2010)
Oh, Y.G., Müller, S.: The group of Hamiltonian homeomorphisms and \(C^0\)symplectic topology. J. Symplectic Geom. 5(2), 167–219 (2007)
Opshtein, E.: \(C^0\)rigidity of characteristics in symplectic geometry. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 42(5), 857–864 (2009)
Piunikhin, S., Salamon, D., Schwarz, M.: Symplectic FloerDonaldson theory and quantum cohomology. In Contact and symplectic geometry (Cambridge, 1994), volume 8 of Publ. Newton Inst., pages 171–200. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (1996)
Polterovich, L.: Symplectic displacement energy for Lagrangian submanifolds. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Syst. 13(2), 357–367 (1993)
Polterovich, L., Shelukhin, E.: Autonomous Hamiltonian flows, Hofer’s geometry and persistence modules. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 22(1), 227–296 (2016)
Rudyak, Y.B., Oprea, J.: On the LusternikSchnirelmann category of symplectic manifolds and the Arnold conjecture. Math. Z. 230(4), 673–678 (1999)
Schwarz, M.: On the action spectrum for closed symplectically aspherical manifolds. Pac. J. Math. 193(2), 419–461 (2000)
Seidel, P.: \(\pi _1\) of symplectic automorphism groups and invertibles in quantum homology rings. Geom. Funct. Anal. 7(6), 1046–1095 (1997)
Seyfaddini, S.: Descent and \(C^0\)rigidity of spectral invariants on monotone symplectic manifolds. J. Topol. Anal. 4(4), 481–498 (2012)
Seyfaddini, S.: \(C^0\)limits of Hamiltonian paths and the OhSchwarz spectral invariants. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 21, 4920–4960 (2013)
Seyfaddini, S.: The displaced disks problem via symplectic topology. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 351(21–22), 841–843 (2013)
Seyfaddini, S.: A note on \(C^0\) rigidity of Hamiltonian isotopies. J. Symplectic Geom. 11(3), 489–496 (2013)
Shelukhin, E.: Viterbo conjecture for Zoll symmetric spaces. arXiv:1811.05552, Nov (2018)
Usher, M.: The sharp energycapacity inequality. Commun. Contemp. Math. 12(3), 457–473 (2010)
Usher, M., Zhang, J.: Persistent homology and FloerNovikov theory. Geom. Topol. 20(6), 3333–3430 (2016)
Viterbo, C.: Symplectic topology as the geometry of generating functions. Math. Annalen 292, 685–710 (1992)
Acknowledgements
The generalization of the Arnold conjecture presented in this paper came to life after our realization that the methods used by Wyatt Howard in [21] could be adapted to nonsmooth settings. We thank him for helpful communications. We would like to thank PierreAntoine Guihéneuf, Helmut Hofer, Rémi Leclercq, Frédéric Le Roux, Nicolas Vichery and Claude Viterbo for helpful conversations. We are also grateful to the anonymous referee for his very careful reading and his valuable comments. Lastly, we thank Egor Shelukhin for bringing the following to our attention: (a variant of) Inequality (1) and the fact that it implies \(C^0\) continuity of barcodes; these results appear in [26]. SS This paper was partially written during my stay at the Institute for Advanced Study in the academic year 20162017. I greatly benefited from the lively research atmosphere of the IAS and would like to thank the members of the School of Mathematics for their warm hospitality. VH is partially supported by the ANR project “Microlocal” ANR15CE400007. LB is partially supported by ISF grants 1380/13 and 2026/17, by the ERC Starting grant 757585, and by the Alon fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by JeanYves Welschinger.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Fixed and periodic points of \(C^0\) generic Hamiltonian homeomorphisms
Fixed and periodic points of \(C^0\) generic Hamiltonian homeomorphisms
Estimating the number of fixed points of generic (in a \(C^1\) sense) Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms has been a central problem in symplectic topology over the past 30 years. The construction of Floer homology implies that this number is bounded below by the sum of the Betti numbers of the manifold. It is therefore natural to ask if similar estimates hold for \(C^0\) generic Hamiltonian homeomorphisms. It turns out that the situation is dramatically different, as the next proposition shows.
Proposition A.1
Let \((M, \omega )\) be any closed symplectic manifold. There exists a residual^{Footnote 14} subset \({\mathcal {U}}\) of \({\overline{\mathrm {Ham}}}(M,\omega )\) such that every element in \({\mathcal {U}}\) has infinitely many fixed points.
In the case of a symplectic surface \((\Sigma , \omega )\), a stronger result holds: Generically in \({\overline{\mathrm {Ham}}}(\Sigma ,\omega )\), the set of fixed points is a Cantor set; see [16]. The proof uses tools that are not available in higher dimensions. Therefore it is not clear to us if this result extends to higher dimensions or not.
The proof of Proposition A.1 will follow easily from the Lefschetz index theory. The Lefschetz index is an integer associated to an isolated fixed point of a continuous map. Of its properties, we will use the following (see e.g. [24], Chapter 2, Section 8.4):

(a)
The index of a nondegenerate fixed point of a diffeomorphism is either 1 or \(1\).

(b)
Fixed points with nonzero index are \(C^0\) stable. More pecisely, if \(x_0\) is an isolated fixed point of a continuous map f, then there exists a \(C^0\) neighborhood of f such that every map in this neighborhood admits a fixed point near \(x_0\).
We are now ready for the proof.
Proof
Let \(\phi \) be a nondegenerate Hamiltonian diffeomorphism which admits at least N fixed points. According to Property (a) above, all its fixed points have nonzero index, hence by Property (b), there exists a \(C^0\) open subset \(U_\phi \subset {\overline{\mathrm {Ham}}}(M,\omega )\) such that every element in \(U_\phi \) has at least N fixed points.
Now, it is well known that nondegenerate Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms are dense in \(\mathrm {Ham}(M,\omega )\), hence in \({\overline{\mathrm {Ham}}}(M,\omega )\). Furthermore, given a nondegenerate Hamiltonian diffeomorphism \(\psi \), we can always perform a local modification near one of its fixed points (which are known to exist by Floer theory), to construct a new Hamiltonian diffeomorphism, \(C^0\) close to \(\psi \) and admitting at least N fixed points. To perform this construction near a fixed point x, choose N distinct points \(x_1,\dots , x_N\) in a small ball B around x such that \(\psi (x_i)\in B\) for all \(i\in B\), and pick a diffeomorphism \(\chi \) supported in B with \(\chi (\psi (x_i))=x_i\) for all \(i=1,\dots , N\). Then, \(\chi \circ \psi \) admits all \(x_1,\dots , x_N\) as fixed points. Moreover, the \(C^0\) distance between \(\chi \circ \psi \) and \(\psi \) can be made arbitrarily small by shrinking B. Finally, we can perturb \(\chi \circ \psi \) to make all fixed points \(x_1,\dots , x_N\) nondegenerate.
As a consequence, the set \(V_N\) of nondegenerate Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms admitting at least N fixed points is dense in \({\overline{\mathrm {Ham}}}(M,\omega )\).
It follows immediately that the set \({\mathcal {U}}_N=\bigcup _{\phi \in V_N}U_\phi \) is a dense open subset and that all its elements have at least N fixed points. Finally, \({\mathcal {U}}=\bigcap _{N>0}U_N\) is a residual subset all of whose elements have infinitely many fixed points. \(\square \)
We end the paper with a brief discussion of the Conley conjecture on closed and symplectically aspherical manifolds. The conjecture, which was proven in [13, 18], states that a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism must have infinitely many periodic points. When it comes to Hamiltonian homeomorphisms the conjecture was proven on surfaces in [30]. In dimensions four and higher, we are neither able to prove it nor are we able to adapt our counterexample from [2] to disprove it. However, we believe that one should be able to adapt the proof of Proposition A.1 to show that, for a \(C^0\) generic Hamiltonian homeomorphism \(\phi \), the set \({\mathcal {P}}_k(\phi )\) consisting of periodic points of period k, must be infinite for infinitely many values of k.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buhovsky, L., Humilière, V. & Seyfaddini, S. The action spectrum and \(C^0\) symplectic topology. Math. Ann. 380, 293–316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0020802102183w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s0020802102183w