Skip to main content
Log in

A classification of harmonic Maass forms

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We give a classification of the Harish-Chandra modules generated by the pullback to \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb {R})\) of harmonic Maass forms for congruence subgroups of \(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})\) with exponential growth allowed at the cusps. We assume that the weight is integral but include vector-valued forms. Due to the weak growth condition, these modules do not need to be irreducible. Elementary Lie algebra considerations imply that there are nine possibilities, and we show, by giving explicit examples, that all of them arise from harmonic Maass forms. Finally, we briefly discuss the case of forms that are not harmonic but rather are annihilated by a power of the Laplacian, where much more complicated Harish-Chandra modules can arise. We hope that our classification will prove useful in understanding harmonic Maass forms from a representation theoretic perspective and that it will illustrate in the simplest case the phenomenon of extensions occurring in the space of automorphic forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the case \(k=1\), the principal series, V(1) in his notation, is a direct sum \({\mathrm{LDS}}^{+}(0)\oplus {\mathrm{LDS}}^{-}(0)\), in our notation. So his indecomposable in this case should be taken to mean the indecomposable II(b) in our Theorem 5.2 rather than V(1).

  2. In fact, this development is already underway, cf. Remark 10 in Sect. 7 for a brief discussion.

  3. We sometimes write \(\beta _k(x)\) in place of \(W_k(-x/2)\), as this notation occurs in many places in the literature.

  4. A function in this space is a finite linear combination of functions satisfying (3.3) for various weights k.

  5. Hence the superscript ‘sm’.

  6. Here we write s for \(\nu \) and take \(\varepsilon =0\).

  7. Note that we have changed the sign compared to [13].

References

  1. Bol, G.: Invarianten linearer Differentialgleichungen. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hambg. 16, 128 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bringmann, K., Diamantis, N., Raum, M.: Mock period functions, sesquiharmonic Maass forms and non-critical values of \(L\)-functions. Adv. Math. 233, 971–1013 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bringmann, K., Diamantis, N. Ehlen, S.: Regularized inner products and errors of modularity, preprint (2016). arXiv:1603.03056v1

  4. Bruinier, J.: Borcherds products on \(O(2,l)\) and Chern classes of Heegner divisors. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1780. Springer, Berlin (2002)

  5. Bruinier, J., Funke, J.: Two geometric theta lifts. Duke Math. J. 125, 45–90 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bump, D., Choie, Y.: Derivatives of modular forms of negative weight. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 2, 111–133 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Digital Library of Mathematical Functions. http://dlmf.nist.gov/

  8. Darmon, H., Lauder, A., Rotger, V.: Overconvergent generalized eigenforms of weight 1 and class fields of real quadratic fields. Adv. Math. 283, 130–142 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Duke, W., Imamoglu, O., Toth, A.: Cycle integrals of the \(j\)-function and mock modular forms. Ann. Math. 173, 947–981 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Duke, W., Li, Y.: Harmonic Maass forms of weight \(1\). Duke Math. J. 164, 39–113 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris, M.: A note on three lemmas of Shimura. Duke Math. J. 46, 871–879 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kudla, S., Yang, T.: Eisenstein series for \(\text{ SL }(2)\). Sci. China 53, 2275–2316 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kudla, S., Rapoport, M., Yang, T.: On the derivative of an Eisenstein series of weight 1. IMRN 7, 347–385 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kudla, S.: Derivatives of Eisenstein series and Faltings heights. Compos. Math. 140, 887–951 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kudla, S.: Modular Forms and Special Cycles on Shimura Curves, Annals of Mathematical Studies, vol. 161. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuga, M., Shimura, G.: On vector differential forms attached to automorphic forms. J. Math. Soc. Jpn. 12, 258–270 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang, S.: Elliptic Functions, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 112, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Niebur, D.: A class of nonanalytic automorphic functions. Nagoya Math. J. 52, 133–145 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pitale, A., Saha, A., Schmidt, R.: Representations of \(\text{ SL } _{2}({\mathbb{R}})\) and nearly holomorphic modular forms. Surikaisekikenkyusho Kokyuroku 1973, 141–154 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pitale, A., Saha, A., Schmidt, R.: Lowest weight modules of \(\text{ Sp }_{4}({\mathbb{R}})\) and nearly holomorphic Siegel modular forms, preprint (2015). arXiv:1501.00524v2

  21. Schulze-Pillot, R.: Weak Maass forms and \(({\mathfrak{g}}, K)\)-modules. Ramanujan J. 26, 437–445 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Shimura, G.: On some arithmetic properties of modular forms of one and several variables. Ann. Math. 102, 491–515 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimura, G.: Nearly holomorphic functions on Hermitian symmetric spaces. Math. Ann. 278, 1–28 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel, C.: Advanced Analytic Number Theory, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, vol. 9, 2nd edn. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Verdier, J.: Sur les intégrales attachées aux formes automorphes [d’après Goro Shimura]. Sémin. Bourbaki 6(216), 149–175 (1960-1961). http://eudml.org/doc/109609

  26. Vogan, D.: Representations of Real Reductive Lie Groups, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 15. Birkhäuser, Boston (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Westerholt-Raum, M.: Harmonic weak Siegel Maass foms I, preprint (2015). arXiv:1502.00557

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was begun during a visit by the second author to the University of Cologne in of 2014 and completed during visits to Oberwolfach, TU Darmstadt, and ETH, Zürich, in the summer of 2016. He would like to thank these institutions for their support and stimulating working environments. The research of the first author is supported by the Alfried Krupp Prize for Young University Teachers of the Krupp foundation and the research leading to these results receives funding from the European Research Council under the European Unions Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 335220—AQSER. The authors thank Dan Bump, Stephan Ehlen, Olav Richter, Rainer Schulze-Pillot, and Martin Westerholt-Raum for useful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Kudla.

Additional information

Communicated by Toby Gee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bringmann, K., Kudla, S. A classification of harmonic Maass forms. Math. Ann. 370, 1729–1758 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-017-1563-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-017-1563-x

Navigation