Non-existence of Classical Solutions with Finite Energy to the Cauchy Problem of the Compressible Navier–Stokes Equations
- 335 Downloads
The well-posedness of classical solutions with finite energy to the compressible Navier–Stokes equations (CNS) subject to arbitrarily large and smooth initial data is a challenging problem. In the case when the fluid density is away from vacuum (strictly positive), this problem was first solved for the CNS in either one-dimension for general smooth initial data or multi-dimension for smooth initial data near some equilibrium state (that is, small perturbation) (Antontsev et al. in Boundary value problems in mechanics of nonhomogeneous fluids, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1990; Kazhikhov in Sibirsk Mat Zh 23:60–64, 1982; Kazhikhov et al. in Prikl Mat Meh 41:282–291, 1977; Matsumura and Nishida in Proc Jpn Acad Ser A Math Sci 55:337–342, 1979, J Math Kyoto Univ 20:67–104, 1980, Commun Math Phys 89:445–464, 1983). In the case that the flow density may contain a vacuum (the density can be zero at some space-time point), it seems to be a rather subtle problem to deal with the well-posedness problem for CNS. The local well-posedness of classical solutions containing a vacuum was shown in homogeneous Sobolev space (without the information of velocity in L2-norm) for general regular initial data with some compatibility conditions being satisfied initially (Cho et al. in J Math Pures Appl (9) 83:243–275, 2004; Cho and Kim in J Differ Equ 228:377–411, 2006, Manuscr Math 120:91–129, 2006; Choe and Kim in J Differ Equ 190:504–523 2003), and the global existence of a classical solution in the same space is established under the additional assumption of small total initial energy but possible large oscillations (Huang et al. in Commun Pure Appl Math 65:549–585, 2012). However, it was shown that any classical solutions to the compressible Navier–Stokes equations in finite energy (inhomogeneous Sobolev) space cannot exist globally in time since it may blow up in finite time provided that the density is compactly supported (Xin in Commun Pure Appl Math 51:229–240, 1998). In this paper, we investigate the well-posedess of classical solutions to the Cauchy problem of Navier–Stokes equations, and prove that the classical solution with finite energy does not exist in the inhomogeneous Sobolev space for any short time under some natural assumptions on initial data near the vacuum. This implies, in particular, that the homogeneous Sobolev space is as crucial as studying the well-posedness for the Cauchy problem of compressible Navier–Stokes equations in the presence of a vacuum at far fields even locally in time.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors would like to thank the referees for their careful reading, helpful suggestions and valuable comments, which helped us a lot to improve the presentation of this manuscript, particularly regarding the proofs of Lemmas 2.3 and 4.3. The research of Li was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11461161007, 11671384, 11871047, and 11225012,), and the “Capacity Building for Sci-Tech Innovation - Fundamental Scientific Research Funds 007175304800 and 025185305000/182”. The research of Wang was supported by Grant Nos. 231668 and 250070 from the Research Council of Norway. The research of Xin was supported partially by the Zheng Ge Ru Foundation, Hong Kong RGC Earmarked Research Grants CUHK-14305315 and CUHK-4048/13P, NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme N-CUHK443/14, and Focused Innovations Scheme from The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Antontsev, S.N., Kazhikhov, A.V., Monakhov, V.N.: Boundary Value Problems in Mechanics of Nonhomogeneous Fluids, vol. 22 of Studies in Mathematics and its Applications. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1990 (Translated from the Russian).Google Scholar
- 13.Han, Q.: A basic course in partial differential equations, vol. 120 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2011Google Scholar
- 20.Jang, J., Masmoudi, N.: Well and ill-posedness for compressible Euler equations with vacuum. J. Math. Phys. 53, 115625, 11 (2012)Google Scholar
- 23.Kanel, J.I.: The Cauchy problem for equations of gas dynamics with viscosity. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 20, 293–306, 463 (1979)Google Scholar
- 24.Kazhikhov, A.V.: On the Cauchy problem for the equations of a viscous gas. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 23, 60–64, 220 (1982)Google Scholar
- 26.Lions, P.-L.: Existence globale de solutions pour les équations de Navier–Stokes compressibles isentropiques. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 316, 1335–1340 (1993)Google Scholar
- 27.Lions, P.-L.: Limites incompressible et acoustique pour des fluides visqueux, compressibles et isentropiques. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 317, 1197–1202 (1993)Google Scholar
- 28.Lions, P.-L.: Mathematical topics in fluid mechanics. Vol. 2, vol. 10 of Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998. Compressible models, Oxford Science PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- 29.Majda, A.J., Bertozzi, A.L.: Vorticity and incompressible flow, vol. 27 of Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002Google Scholar
- 30.Matsumura, A., Nishida, T.: The initial value problem for the equations of motion of compressible viscous and heat-conductive fluids. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 55, 337–342 (1979)Google Scholar
- 34.Salvi, R., Straskraba, I.: Global existence for viscous compressible fluids and their behavior as \(t\rightarrow \infty \). J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 40, 17–51 (1993)Google Scholar
- 35.Serre, D.: Solutions faibles globales des équations de Navier–Stokes pour un fluide compressible. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 303, 639–642 (1986)Google Scholar
- 36.Serre, D.: Sur l'équation monodimensionnelle d'un fluide visqueux, compressible et conducteur de chaleur. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math., 303, 703–706 1986Google Scholar