Advertisement

Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis

, Volume 229, Issue 3, pp 1223–1238 | Cite as

A Note on Weak Solutions of Conservation Laws and Energy/Entropy Conservation

  • Piotr Gwiazda
  • Martin Michálek
  • Agnieszka Świerczewska-Gwiazda
Open Access
Article
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

A common feature of systems of conservation laws of continuum physics is that they are endowed with natural companion laws which are in such cases most often related to the second law of thermodynamics. This observation easily generalizes to any symmetrizable system of conservation laws; they are endowed with nontrivial companion conservation laws, which are immediately satisfied by classical solutions. Not surprisingly, weak solutions may fail to satisfy companion laws, which are then often relaxed from equality to inequality and overtake the role of physical admissibility conditions for weak solutions. We want to answer the question: what is a critical regularity of weak solutions to a general system of conservation laws to satisfy an associated companion law as an equality? An archetypal example of such a result was derived for the incompressible Euler system in the context of Onsager’s conjecture in the early nineties. This general result can serve as a simple criterion to numerous systems of mathematical physics to prescribe the regularity of solutions needed for an appropriate companion law to be satisfied.

References

  1. 1.
    Ball, J.M.: Some open problems in elasticity. In: Geometry, Mechanics, and Dynamics, pages 3–59. Springer, New York, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buckmaster T.: Onsager’s conjecture almost everywhere in time. Commun. Math. Phys., 333(3), 1175–1198 (2015)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buckmaster T., De Lellis C., Isett P., Székelyhidi L. Jr.: Anomalous dissipation for 1/5-Hölder Euler flows. Ann. Math., (2) 182(1), 127–172 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buckmaster T., De Lellis C., Székelyhidi L. Jr.: Dissipative Euler flows with Onsager-critical spatial regularity. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 69(9), 1613–1670 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buckmaster, T., De Lellis, C., Székelyhidi, L. Jr., Vicol V.: Onsager’s conjecture for admissible weak solutions. arXiv:1701.08678, 2017.
  6. 6.
    Caflisch R.E., Klapper I., Steele G.: Remarks on singularities, dimension and energy dissipation for ideal hydrodynamics and MHD. Commun. Math. Phys., 184(2), 443–455 (1997)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheskidov A., Constantin P., Friedlander S., Shvydkoy R.: Energy conservation and Onsager’s conjecture for the Euler equations. Nonlinearity, 21(6), 1233–1252 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Constantin, P., E,W., Titi, E.S.: Onsager’s conjecture on the energy conservation for solutions of Euler’s equation. Commun. Math. Phys., 165(1), 207–209 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dafermos, C.M.: Hyperbolic conservation laws in continuum physics, volume 325 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Berlin, fourth edition, 2016.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dafermos C.M., Hrusa W.J.: Energy methods for quasilinear hyperbolic initial-boundary value problems. Applications to elastodynamics. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 87(3), 267–292 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Lellis C., Székelyhidi L. Jr.: The Euler equations as a differential inclusion. Ann. Math. (2), 170(3), 1417–1436 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De Lellis C., Székelyhidi L. Jr.: Dissipative continuous Euler flows. Invent. Math., 193(2), 377–407 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Lellis C., Székelyhidi L. Jr.: Dissipative Euler flows and Onsager’s conjecture. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 16(7), 1467–1505 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demoulini S., Stuart D.M.A., Tzavaras A.E.: A variational approximation scheme for three-dimensional elastodynamics with polyconvex energy. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 157(4), 325–344 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Drivas, T.D., Eyink, G.L.: An Onsager singularity theorem for turbulent solutions of compressible Euler equations. Commu. Math. Phys. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-017-3078-4.
  16. 16.
    Duchon J., Robert R.: Inertial energy dissipation for weak solutions of incompressible Euler and Navier–Stokes equations. Nonlinearity, 13(1), 249–255 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eyink G.L.: Energy dissipation without viscosity in ideal hydrodynamics. I. Fourier analysis and local energy transfer. Physica D, 78(3-4), 222–240 (1994)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feireisl E., Gwiazda P., Świerczewska-Gwiazda A., Wiedemann E.: Regularity and energy conservation for the compressible Euler equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 223(3), 1–21 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Godunov S.K.: An interesting class of quasi-linear systems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 139, 521–523 (1961)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Isett, P.: A Proof of Onsager’s Conjecture. arXiv:1608.08301, 2016.
  21. 21.
    Isett, P.: Hölder continuous Euler flows in three dimensions with compact support in time, volume 196 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2017.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kang E., Lee J.: Remarks on the magnetic helicity and energy conservation for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. Nonlinearity, 20(11), 2681–2689 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Electrodynamics of Continuous Media. Volume VIII of Course of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leslie T.M., Shvydkoy R.: The energy balance relation for weak solutions of the density-dependent Navier–Stokes equations. J. Differ. Equ., 261(6), 3719–3733 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shvydkoy R.: On the energy of inviscid singular flows. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 349(2), 583–595 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shvydkoy R.: Lectures on the Onsager conjecture. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 3(3), 473–496 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu C.: Energy conservation for the weak solutions of the compressible Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 225(2), 1073–1087 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPraha 1Czech Republic
  3. 3.Institute of Applied Mathematics and MechanicsUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations