Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of survey methods for fungi using metabarcoding and fruit body inventories in an altitudinal gradient

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metabarcoding of environmental samples is nowadays an established method in biodiversity research. When it comes to studying fungal populations in various ecotypes, fruit body inventories are the traditional method to assess the diversity of fungal communities. In this study, both methods—metabarcoding of soil samples and a traditional fruit body inventory—were conducted on 144 sample plots in an altitudinal gradient in the Bavarian Forest (Germany) and the results were compared. Metabarcoding detected significantly more species than the traditional fruit body inventory. The majority of taxa recorded in the fruit body inventory belonged to the Basidiomycota, whereas in the metabarcoding data, the distribution of species between Basidiomycota and Ascomycota was approximately balanced. Species of several orders forming inconspicuous or hypogeous fruit bodies were detected only by metabarcoding, while several wood decomposers were recorded only in the fruit body inventory. The proportion of detected wood-colonising species with melanized spores was considerably higher with metabarcoding than with the fruit body inventory, where more than 70% of recorded wood-colonisers had hyaline spores. Based on the metabarcoding data, a decline of species richness with increasing altitude was evident, but this was not visible in the fruit body inventory data. Detrended correspondence analyses yielded similar results for relative species community similarities with both survey methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Survey data of metabarcoding, including coordinates and collection dates are archived in NCBI BioSamples under Submission ID SUB11928789 and SUB9332799.The datasets generated by the fruit body inventory or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Finn Wahl (Bavarian State Institute of Forestry, Freising, Germany) for assistance with trait mapping, Johannes Matt (Nature Park Bavarian Forest) for assistance in the field work, Theresa M. L. Janssen and Gerasimos Gkoutselis (University of Bayreuth, Dept. of Mycology) for assistance in the laboratory. Furthermore, we want to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This study was conducted within the research project “Höhengradient” funded by the Forest Climate Fund, sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture and the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, Germany (References: 22WC412201, 22WC412203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

This project was designed by AS, MB and GR. The fruit body monitoring campaigns were designed by MB and the sampling campaigns and lab workflow for the metabarcoding part by GR and JH. Metabarcoding samples were collected by DO and processed by JH who also analysed the sequence data. The combined analysis of both datasets was conducted by MB and AS. The manuscript was drafted by MB and AS with additions of JH and further elaborated by all co-authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Markus Blaschke or Gerhard Rambold.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Communicated by Yusuf Akhter.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blaschke, M., Siemonsmeier, A., Harjes, J. et al. Comparison of survey methods for fungi using metabarcoding and fruit body inventories in an altitudinal gradient. Arch Microbiol 205, 269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-023-03606-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-023-03606-9

Keywords

Navigation