Abstract
In the present study, the taxonomic position of Bacillus tepidiphilus was re-evaluated. Bacillus tepidiphilus (B. tepidiphilus) SYSU G01002T showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with the type strain Peribacillus alkalitolerans (P. alkalitolerans) (97.7%). In the phylogenetic (based on 16S rRNA sequence) and phylogenomic (based on 71 bacterial single-copy genes) trees, B. tepidiphilus SYSU G01002T clade with the members of the genus Peribacillus. The amino acid identity (AAI) value of B. tepidiphilus SYSU G01002T was highest with P. alkalitolerans KCTC 33631T (73.6%). The AAI value between B. tepidiphilus SYSU G01002T and P. alkalitolerans KCTC 33631T was above the cutoff level for genus delineation. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between B. tepidiphilus and P. alkalitolerans KCTC 33631T was 74.1%, which was below the ANI value (95–96%) for species delineation. Based on the phylogenetic, phylogenomic, AAI, and ANI analysis, Bacillus tepidiphilus is proposed to transfer to the genus Peribacillus as Peribacillus tepidiphilus comb. nov. The type strain is SYSU G01002T (= KCTC 43131T = CGMCC 1.17491T).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340
Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Delmont TO (2015) Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ’omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1319
Felsenstein J (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01734359
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N, Chen S (2020) Robust demarcation of 17 distinct Bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus Bacillus limiting it only to the members of the Subtilis and Cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5753–5798
Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01731581
Konstantinidis KT, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R (2017) Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy. ISME J 11:2399–2406. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.113
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Narsing Rao MP, Dong ZY, Kan Y, Xiao M, Kang YQ, Li WJ (2020) Bacillus tepidiphilus sp. nov., isolated from tepid spring. Arch Microbiol 202:2367–2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-01958-0
Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK (2016) Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal Methods 8:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY02550H
Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906412106
Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R (2015) Past and future species definitions for Bacteria and Archaea. Syst Appl Microbiol 38:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.001
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
Stackebrandt E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 33:152–155
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
Yarza P, Yilmaz P, Pruesse E, Glöckner FO, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB, Euzéby J, Amann R, Rosselló-Móra R (2014) Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:635–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3330
Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613–1617. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Office of the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation; and the Thailand Science Research and Innovation through the Kasetsart University Reinventing University Program 2022. MPNR has been awarded a post-doctorate fellowship under KU Reinventing University Program 2022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MPNR designed the study and conducted the genome analysis. AD and AB revised and corrected the draft. MPNR and AT supervised the study and revised the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Narsing Rao, M.P., Dhulappa, A., Banerjee, A. et al. Transfer of Bacillus tepidiphilus Narsing Rao et al. 2021 to the genus Peribacillus as Peribacillus tepidiphilus comb. nov.. Arch Microbiol 204, 545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03160-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03160-w