Abstract
There are numerous factors restricting wide application of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in dairy industry, causing urgent demands for novel bioprotectants. Protective effects and metabolites of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (L. lactis) from ultraviolet (UV)-induced supernatant were investigated and the protective mechanism was explored. The strain viability of the group treated with the supernatant of continuous UV irradiation (V1) and the group with intermittent UV irradiation (V2) was 8.45 and 14.13 times of the control group, respectively. Further exploration on the protective of L. lactis supernatant, under different dose of UV treatment, showed it was dose-dependent. The condition for the supernatant with best protective effect was vertical distance 50.00 cm, horizontal distance 25.00 cm, intermittent UV irradiation (30 s interval 30 s) for 4.5 min (V2), which was chose for untargeted metabolite analysis. And that in V1 was for comparative study. There were 181 up-regulated metabolites in V1 and 161 up-regulated metabolites in V2, respectively. Most of the up-regulated metabolites were related to secondary metabolite synthesis, environmental microbial metabolism, antibiotic synthesis and amino acid biosynthesis. Notably, production of dithiothreitol (DTT) in V2 was 65.2-fold higher than that in the control group. Trehalose in ABC transporter pathway was also up-regulated in the metabolites induced by UV. Results indicated that L. lactis could adapt to the UV stress by adjusting metabolic pathways and producing special metabolites to protect itself. This research offers the basis for robust strain development and contributes to initial study on potential bioprotectant.
Data availability
All data in this study are included.
References
Anan’ina LN, Gorbunov AA, Pyankova AA (2021) Physiological response of the moderately halophilic psychrotolerant strain Chromohalobacter sp. N1 to salinity change and low temperature. Can J Microbiol 67:342–348. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2020-0299
Blacher E et al (2019) Potential roles of gut microbiome and metabolites in modulating ALS in mice. Nature 572:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1443-5
Duwat P, Cesselin B, Sourice S, Gruss A (2000) Lactococcus lactis, a bacterial model for stress responses and survival. Int J Food Microbiol 55:83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00179-3
Esfahani MN, Kusano M, Nguyen KH, Watanabe Y, Tran L (2016) Adaptation of the symbiotic Mesorhizobium-chickpea relationship to phosphate deficiency relies on reprogramming of whole-plant metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E4610-4619. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-414
Grossman S et al (2020) Novel quinazolinone inhibitors of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing transcriptional regulator PqsR. Eur J Med Chem 208:112778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112778
Guo H et al (2020) Multi-omics analyses of radiation survivors identify radioprotective microbes and metabolites. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9097
Hu Z et al (2016) Comparative photosynthetic and metabolic analyses reveal mechanism of improved cold stress tolerance in bermudagrass by exogenous melatonin. Plant Physiol Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.01.008
Jagdale GB, Grewal PS, Salminen SO (2005) Both heat-shock and cold-shock influence trehalose metabolism in an entomopathogenic nematode. J Parasitol 91:988–994. https://doi.org/10.1645/ge-504r.1
Kimoto-Nira H, Sekiyama Y, Moriya N (2019) Towards application of water extract from heat-killed Lactococcus lactis H61 as a cosmetic ingredient. Lett Appl Microbiol 68:530–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13136
Knorr D (1999) Novel approaches in food-processing technology: new technologies for preserving foods and modifying function. Curr Opin Biotechnol 10:485–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-1669(99)00015-4
Kuběnová L, Takáč T, Šamaj J, Ovečka M (2021) Single amino acid exchange in ACTIN2 confers increased tolerance to oxidative stress in Arabidopsis der1-3 mutant. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041879
Li Y, Li J, Ye Z, Lu L (2021) Enhancement of angucycline production by combined UV mutagenesis and ribosome engineering and fermentation optimization in Streptomyces dengpaensis XZHG99(T). Prep Biochem Biotechnol 51:173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2020.1805754
Lin S, Kang Q, Pan D, Liu X, Lu J (2017) Identification of Lyoprotectants Released from Gradient-freezing Pretreated Entocyte in Lactococcus Lactis Subsp. Lactis IL1403. Current Topics in Nutraceutical Research 17:122–134. https://doi.org/10.37290/ctnr2641-452X.17,122-134
Main PA, Angley MT, O”Doherty CE, Thomas P, Fenech M (2012) The potential role of the antioxidant and detoxification properties of glutathione in autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Metab 9:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-9-35
Mao R, Zhou K, Han Z, Wang Y (2016) Subtilisin QK-2: secretory expression in Lactococcus lactis and surface display onto gram-positive enhancer matrix (GEM) particles. Microb Cell Fact 15:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0478-7
Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7(9):405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9
Nishihara Y (1988) Comparative toxicity of 4-chlorobiphenyl and its metabolite 4-chloro-4′-biphenylol in isolated rat liver mitochondria. Biochem Pharmacol 37:2915–2926. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(88)90276-6
Papagianni M (2012) Metabolic engineering of lactic acid bacteria for the production of industrially important compounds. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 3:e201210003. https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201210003
Parlindungan E, May BK, Jones OAH (2019) metabolic insights into the effects of nutrient stress on Lactobacillus plantarum B21. Front Mol Biosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2019.00075
Rasulova M, Zečić A, Monje Moreno JM, Vandemeulebroucke L, Dhondt I, Braeckman BP (2021) Elevated trehalose levels in C. elegans daf-2 mutants increase stress resistance, not lifespan. Metabolites. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo11020105
Richter AA et al (2020) The architecture of the diaminobutyrate acetyltransferase active site provides mechanistic insight into the biosynthesis of the chemical chaperone ectoine. J Biol Chem 295:2822–2838. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.011277
Rochfort S (2005) Metabolomics reviewed: a new “omics” platform technology for systems biology and implications for natural products research. J Nat Prod 68:1813–1820. https://doi.org/10.1021/np050255w
Sedio BE (2017) Recent breakthroughs in metabolomics promise to reveal the cryptic chemical traits that mediate plant community composition, character evolution and lineage diversification. New Phytol 214:952–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14438
Singhvi M, Zendo T, Iida H, Gokhale D, Sonomoto K (2017) Stimulation of d- and l-lactate dehydrogenases transcriptional levels in presence of diammonium hydrogen phosphate resulting to enhanced lactic acid production by Lactobacillus strain. J Biosci Bioeng 124:674–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.07.009
Sivaraman J, Li Y, Banks J, Cane DE, Matte A, Cygler M (2003) Crystal structure of Escherichia coli PdxA, an enzyme involved in the pyridoxal phosphate biosynthesis pathway. J Biol Chem 278:43682–43690. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M306344200
Spratlin JL, Serkova NJ, Eckhardt SG (2009) Clinical applications of metabolomics in oncology: a review. Clin Cancer Res 15:431–440. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-08-1059
Vasin MV (2014) Comments on the mechanisms of action of radiation protective agents: basis components and their polyvalence. Springerplus 3:414. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-414
Willimsky G, Bang H, Fischer G, Marahiel MA (1992) Characterization of cspB, a Bacillus subtilis inducible cold shock gene affecting cell viability at low temperatures. J Bacteriol 174:6326–6335. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.174.20.6326-6335.1992
Yamanouchi K, Tsujiguchi T, Sakamoto Y, Ito K (2019) Short-term follow-up of intestinal flora in radiation-exposed mice. J Radiat Res 60:328–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrz002
Zhai Q, Xiao Y, Narbad A, Chen W (2018) Comparative metabolomic analysis reveals global cadmium stress response of Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Metallomics 10:1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mt00095f
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870093, 31900296), the Research Project of People’s Liberation Army, (BX115C007, BFP20C006), and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province for Outstanding Youth (202300410365), Key Scientific Research Projects of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province (21A530006), the Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (22HASTIT037).
Funding
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 81870093, 31900296); the Research Project of People’s Liberation Army (Grant nos. BX115C007, BFP20C006); Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (Grant no. 202300410365); Key Scientific Research Projects of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province (Grant no. 21A530006), the Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (Grant no. 22HASTIT037).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YG, LC and LZ performed the experiments. JL, JZ, YG and LC conceived the study. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by YG. YG wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, Y., Zhu, J., Zhao, L. et al. Protective effect of the stressed supernatant from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and its metabolic analysis. Arch Microbiol 204, 428 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03034-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-022-03034-1