Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of voriconazole in vitro and in invertebrate model of cryptococcosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cryptococcosis is a common opportunistic infection in patients with advanced HIV infection and may also affect immunocompetent patients. The available antifungal agents are few and other options are needed for the cryptococcosis treatment. In this work, we first analyzed the virulence of twelve C. neoformans and C. gattii strains assessing capsule thickness, biofilms formation, and survival and morbidity in the invertebrate model of Galleria mellonella and then we evaluated the antifungal activity of voriconazole (VRC) in vitro and in vivo also using G. mellonella. Our results showed that all Cryptococcus spp. isolates were able to produce capsule and biofilms, and were virulent using G. mellonella model. The VRC has inhibitory activity on planktonic cells with MIC values ranging from 0.03 to 0.25 μg/mL on Cryptococcus spp.; and these isolates were more tolerant to fluconazole (ranging from 0.25 to 16 μg/mL), the triazol agent often recommended alone or in combination with amphotericin B in the cryptococcosis therapy. In contrast, mature biofilms were less susceptible to the VRC treatment. The VRC (10 or 20 mg/kg) treatment of infected G. mellonella larvae significantly increased the larval survival when compared to the untreated group for the both Cryptococcus species and significantly decreased the fungal burden and dissemination in the larval tissue. Our findings corroborate with the literature data, supporting the potential use of VRC as an alternative for cryptococcosis treatment. Here, we emphasize the use of G. mellonella larval model as an alternative animal model for studies of antifungal efficacy on mycosis, including cryptococcosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP—Brasil, Grants 2015/07993-0 and 2017/19374-9) and in part by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (CNPq—Brasil) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES—Brasil, Finance Code 001). Cristina de Castro Spadari and Fernanda Walt Mendes da Silva de Bastiani were participants of the fellowship program from CAPES.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FWMSB and PBBP designed and performed all experiments and analyzed data. ASAM contributed with the Cryptococcus clinical isolates. CCS and KI analyzed all data and wrote the manuscript. All authors revised the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Ishida.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Castro Spadari, C., da Silva de Bastiani, F.W.M., Pisani, P.B.B. et al. Efficacy of voriconazole in vitro and in invertebrate model of cryptococcosis. Arch Microbiol 202, 773–784 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01789-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01789-8

Keywords

Navigation