Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of six methods of DNA extraction for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis by real-time PCR

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brucellosis is an infectious disease caused by bacteria of the genus Brucella, which affects domestic animals and is transmissible to humans. The objective of this study was to evaluate six methods of DNA extraction directly from bovine tissue to detect Brucella spp. The Cq values for all samples were above 30 and varied according to the extraction kit used, but four kits showed no statistical difference in sensitivity. This work demonstrates the importance of choosing the best extraction kit before validation of a molecular diagnostic technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Ajlan HH, Ibrahim AS, Al-Salamah AA (2011) Comparison of different PCR methods for detection of Brucella spp. in human blood samples. Pol J Microbiol 60(1):27–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alton GG, Jones LM, Angus RD, Verger JM (1988) Techniques for the Brucellosis laboratory: bacteriological methods. Inram, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielanski A, Algire J, Lalonde A, Nadin-Davis S (2009) Transmission of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) via in vitro-fertilized embryos to recipients, but not to their offspring. Theriogenology 71(3):499–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins CH (1983) Laboratory-acquired infections. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbel MJ (2006) Brucellosis in humans and animals. WHO Press, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauphin LA, Hutchins RJ, Bost LA, Bowen MD (2009) Evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for recovery of Brucella DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs. J Clin Microbiol 47(12):3920–3926

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ergönül O, Celikbaş A, Tezeren D, Güvener E, Dokuzoğuz B (2004) Analysis of risk factors for laboratory-acquired Brucella infections. J Hosp Infect 56(3):223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster JT, Okinaka RT, Svensson R, Shaw K, De BK, Robison RA, Probert WS, Kenefic LJ, Brown WD, Keim P (2008) Real-time PCR assays of single-nucleotide polymorphisms defining the major Brucella clades. J Clin Microbiol 46(1):296–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gwida MM, El-Gohary AH, Melzer F, Tomaso H, Rösler U, Wernery U, Wernery R, Elschner MC, Khan I, Eickhoff M, Schöner D, Neubauer H (2011) Comparison of diagnostic tests for the detection of Brucella spp. in camel sera. BMC Res Notes 4:525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt PW (2011) Molecular diagnosis of infections and resistance in veterinary and human parasites. Vet Parasitol 180(1–2):12–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer HC (1992) Evaluating medical tests: objective and quantitative guidelines. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusk TS, Strain E, Kase JA (2013) Comparison of six commercial DNA extraction kits for detection of Brucella neotomae in Mexican and Central American-style cheese and other milk products. Food Microbiol 34(1):100–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn T, Wyer PC, Newman TB, Keitz S, Leipzig R, Guyatt G (2004) Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3. Measures of observer variability (kappa statistic). Can Med Assoc J 171:1369–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OIE (2019) Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals 2018. World Organisation for Animal Health, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzil LL, Preis IS, Almeida IG, Souza PG, Soares Filho PM, Jacinto FB, Fonseca Júnior AA (2016) Validation of the multiplex PCR for identification of Brucella spp. Ciência Rural 46(5):847–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro de Oliveira TF, Fonseca AA Jr, Camargos MF, de Oliveira AM, Pinto Cottorello AC, Souza Ados R, de Almeida IG, Heinemann MB (2013) Detection of contaminants in cell cultures, sera and trypsin. Biologicals 41(6):407–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poester FP, Gonçalves VS, Lage AP (2002) Brucellosis in Brazil. Vet Microbiol 90(1–4):55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Queipo-Ortuño MI, Tena F, Colmenero JD, Morata P (2008) Comparison of seven commercial DNA extraction kits for the recovery of Brucella DNA from spiked human serum samples using real-time PCR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27(2):109–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa MG, Salvarani FM, Bomjardim HA, Fonseca JRAA, Preis IS, Brito MF, Leite RC, Barbosa JD (2015) Infecção transplacentária e intrauterina por Brucella abortus em búfalos (Bubalus bubalis). Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira (Impresso) 35:882–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaso H, Kattar M, Eickhoff M, Wernery U, Al Dahouk S, Straube E, Neubauer H, Scholz HC (2010) Comparison of commercial DNA preparation kits for the detection of Brucellae in tissue using quantitative real-time PCR. BMC Infect Dis 20(10):100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu WL, Nielsen K (2010) Review of detection of Brucella sp. by polymerase chain reaction. Croat Med J 51(4):306–313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Laboratório Nacional Agropecuário (Lanagro-MG), INCT Pecuária and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico) SAGRES Project: 457417/2012-9 for financial support and fellowships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antônio Augusto Fonseca Júnior.

Additional information

Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Preis, I.S., Moura, A., de Souza, P.G. et al. Comparison of six methods of DNA extraction for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis by real-time PCR. Arch Microbiol 201, 1025–1028 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01675-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01675-3

Keywords

Navigation