Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 197, Issue 10, pp 1141–1149 | Cite as

Protein sequences insight into heavy metal tolerance in Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894 encoded by plasmid pESA3

  • Navaneet Chaturvedi
  • Michal Kajsik
  • Stephen Forsythe
  • Paras Nath Pandey
Original Paper

Abstract

The recently annotated genome of the bacterium Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894 suggests that the organism has the ability to bind heavy metals. This study demonstrates heavy metal tolerance in C. sakazakii, in which proteins with the heavy metal interaction were recognized by computational and experimental study. As the result, approximately one-fourth of proteins encoded on the plasmid pESA3 are proposed to have potential interaction with heavy metals. Interaction between heavy metals and predicted proteins was further corroborated using protein crystal structures from protein data bank database and comparison of metal-binding ligands. In addition, a phylogenetic study was undertaken for the toxic heavy metals, arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury, which generated relatedness clustering for lead, cadmium and arsenic. Laboratory studies confirmed the organism’s tolerance to tellurite, copper and silver. These experimental and computational study data extend our understanding of the genes encoding for proteins of this important neonatal pathogen and provide further insights into the genotypes associated with features that can contribute to its persistence in the environment. The information will be of value for future environmental protection from heavy toxic metals.

Keywords

Bioremediation Cronobacter sakazakii Heavy metal protein Heavy metal resistance Plasmid-borne genes Toxic heavy metals 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the support of the DBT-BIF facility in Center of Bioinformatics, University of Allahabad, India. N.C. acknowledges a Ph.D. fellowship from UGC, New Delhi, India.

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bairoch A, Boeckmann B, Ferro S, Gasteiger E (2004) Swiss-Prot: juggling between evolution and stability. Brief Bioinform 5:39–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Rapp BA, Wheeler DL (2000) GenBank Nucleic Acids Res 28:15–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF Jr, Brice MD, Rogers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M (1977) The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 112:535–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brathwaite RL, Rabone SDC (1985) Heavy metal sulphide deposits and geochemical surveys for heavy metals in New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 15(4):363–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chasteen TG, Fuentes DE, Tantalean JC, Vasquez CC (2009) Tellurite: history, oxidative stress, and molecular mechanisms of resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:820–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaturvedi N, Pandey PN (2014) Phylogenetic analysis of gammaproteobacterial arsenate reductase proteins specific to Enterobacteriaceae family, signifying arsenic toxicity. Interdiscip Sci 6(1):57–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Castro E, Sigrist CJA, Gattiker A, Bulliard V, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Hulo N (2006) ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W362–W365PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Falquet L, Pagni M, Bucher P, Nicolas Hulo, Sigrist CJA, Hofmann K, Bairoch A (2002) The PROSITE database, its status in 2002. Nucleic Acids Res 30:235–238PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Forsythe SJ, Dickins B, Jolley KA (2014) Cronobacter, the emergent bacterial pathogen Enterobacter sakazakii comes of age; MLST and whole genome sequence analysis. BMC Genom 15:1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. George RA, Spriggs RV, Bartlett GJ, Gutteridge A, MacArthur MW, Porter CT, Al-Lazikani B, Thornton JM, Swindells MB (2005) Effective function annotation through catalytic residue conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:12299–12304PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilmour MW, Thompson NR, Sanders M, Parkhill J, Taylor D (2004) The complete nucleotide sequence of the resistance plasmid R478: defining the backbone components of incompatibility group H conjugative plasmids through comparative genomics. Plasmid 52:182–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Golovin A, Henrick K (2008) MSDmotif: exploring protein sites and motifs. BMC Bioinform 9:312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Golovin A, Henrick K (2009) Chemical substructure search in SQL. J Chem Inf Model 49:22–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Golovin A, Dimitropoulos D, Oldfield T, Rachedi A, Henrick K (2005) MSDsite: a database search and retrieval system for the analysis and viewing of bound ligands and active sites. Proteins 58:190–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Iversen C, Forsythe S (2003) Risk profile of Enterobacter sakazakii, an emergent pathogen associated with infant milk formula. Trends Food Sci Technol 14:443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joseph S, Forsythe SJ (2011) Predominance of Cronobacter sakazakii ST4 with neonatal infections. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1713–1715PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Joseph S, Sonbol H, Hariri S, Desai P, McClelland M, Forsythe SJ (2012) Diversity of the Cronobacter genus as revealed by multi locus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 50:3031–3039PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kucerova E, Clifton SW, Xia XQ, Long F, Porwollik S et al (2010) Genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894 and comparative genomic hybridization analysis with other Cronobacter species. PLoS One 5:e9556PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kucerova E, Joseph S, Forsythe S (2011) Cronobacter: diversity and ubiquity. Qual Assur Saf Foods Crops 3:104–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Livingstone CD, Barton GJ (1996) Identification of functional residues and secondary structure from protein multiple sequence alignment. Methods Enzymol 266:497–512CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Magrane M, the UniProt consortium (2011) UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data, Database, bar009Google Scholar
  23. Mergea M (2007) Plasmids pMOL28 and pMOL30 of Cupriavidus metallidurans are specialized in the maximal viable response to heavy metals. J Bacteriol 189:7417–7425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicolas H, Sigrist CJA, Le Saux V, Langendijk-Genevaux S, Bordoli L, Gattiker A, De Castro E, Bucher P, Bairoch A (2004) Recent improvements to the PROSITE database. Nucleic Acids Res 32(Database issue):D134–D137Google Scholar
  25. Nies DH (1999) Microbial heavy-metal resistance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:730–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Osaili T, Forsythe S (2009) Desiccation resistance and persistence of Cronobacter species in infant formula. Intl J Food Microbiol 136:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ouzounis C, Perez-Irratxeta C, Sander C, Valencia A (1998) Are binding residues conserved? Pac Symp Biocomput 3:401–412Google Scholar
  28. Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Ann Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pupko T, Bell RE, Mayrose I, Glaser F, Ben-Tal N (2002) Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within their homologues. Bioinformatics 18:S71–S77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sigrist CJA, Cerutti L, Hulo N, Gattiker A, Falquet L, Pagni M, Bairoch A, Bucher P (2002) PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief Bioinform 3:265–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sigrist CJA, Cerutti L, de Castro E, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Bulliard V, Bairoch A, Hulo N (2010) PROSITE, a protein domain database for functional characterization and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 38(Database issue):161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Silver S (1996) Bacterial resistance to toxic metal ions—a review. Gene 179:9–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Silver S, Phung LT (1996) Bacterial heavy metal resistance: new surprises. Annu Rev Microbiol 50:753–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, and Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 10:2731–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thilakaraj R, Raghunathan K, Anishetty S, Pennathur G (2007) In silico identification of putative metal binding motifs. Bioinformatics 23:267–271CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Valls M, de Lorenzo V (2002) Exploiting the genetic and biochemical capacities of bacteria for the remediation of heavy metal pollution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:327–338CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wackett LP, Dodge AG, Ellis LBM (2004) Microbial genomics and the periodic table. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:647–655PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. White C, Sharman AK, Gadd GM (1998) An integrated microbial process for the bioremediation of soil contaminated with toxic metals. Nat Biotechnol 16:572–575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang W, Colman RW (2000) Conserved amino acids in metal-binding motifs of PDE3A are involved in substrate and inhibitor binding. Blood 95:3380–3386PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Navaneet Chaturvedi
    • 1
  • Michal Kajsik
    • 2
  • Stephen Forsythe
    • 2
  • Paras Nath Pandey
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Pathogen Research Group, School of Science and TechnologyNottingham Trent UniversityClifton Lane, NottinghamUK
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsUniversity of AllahabadAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations