Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inhibition of uropathogens by lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy foods and cow’s intestine in western Nigeria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A total of 96 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were isolated from African indigenous fermented products and cow’s intestines to study their inhibitory capability against multi-drug-resistant uropathogens. Escherichia coli accounted for approximately 45% of isolated uropathogens, followed by Staphylococcus spp. (20%). The Gram negative uropathogens were highly resistant to quinolones, co-trimoxazole, teicoplanin and some β-lactams, while the Staphylococcus spp. showed high resistance to aminoglycosides, β-lactams and macrolides. Twenty-four LAB isolates were selected based on their antimicrobial activity against two uropathogenic Staphylococcus aureus strains and bacteriocin production. LAB strains showing antimicrobial activity were grouped into smaller groups through amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). Representative strains were identified as Weissella spp., Enterococcus faecium, Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus brevis through sequencing of 16S rDNA. The Weissella spp. and L. brevis strains demonstrated remarkable inhibitory activity against seven strains of Gram negative uropathogens. Two strains of L. lactis produced a bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance active against Lactobacillus sakei. In this study, an unusual high rate of co-trimoxazole, quinolones and macrolides resistance among uropathogens from south west Nigeria was discovered. Based on their sensitivity to Weissella spp., there is a potential for using these LAB as a natural approach for the protection against the uropathogens assayed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeniyi BA, Amajoyi CC (2004) Activity of sixteen antimicrobial agents and multidrug resistance of uropathogenic isolates from ciprofloxacin treated outpatients. Afr J Med Pharm Sci 8:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquilanti L, Garofalo C, Osimani A, Silvestri G, Vignaroli C, Clementi F (2007) Isolation and molecular characterization of antibiotic-resistant lactic acid bacteria from poultry and swine meat products. J Food Prot 70:557–565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aroutcheva A, Gariti D, Simon M, Shott S, Faro J, Simoes JA, Gurguis A, Faro S (2001) Defense factors of vagina lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaglio F, Felis GE (2005) Taxonomy of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria. In: Tannock GW (ed) Probiotics and prebiotics: scientific aspects. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, pp 25–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Garau J, Xercavins M, Rodríguez-Carballeira M, Gómez-Vera JR, Coll I, Vidal D, Llovet T, Ruíz-Bremón A (1999) Emergence and dissemination of quinolone-resistant E. coli in the community. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2761–2841

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S, Tillotson G (1997) Use of ciprofloxacin in developing countries. Ped Infect Dis 16:150–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guay DR (2008) Contemporary management of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Drugs 68:1169–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta K, Sahm D, Mayfield D, Stamm WE (2001) Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens that cause community-acquired urinary tract infections in women: a nationwide analysis. Clin Infect Dis 33:89–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huovinen P, Sundstrom L, Swedberg G, Skold O (1995) Trimethoprim and sulfonamide resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:279–289

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juárez-Tomás MS, Ocaña V, Wiese B, Nader-Macías ME (2003) Growth and lactic acid production by vaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus CRL 1259. Inhibition of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol 52:1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MS, Chung J, Kim SM, Yang KH, Oh JS (2006) Effect of Weissella cibaria isolates on the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Caries Res 40:418–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klare I, Konstabel C, Werner G, Huys G, Vankerckhoven V, Kahlmeter G, Hildebrandt B, Müller-Bertling S, Witte W, Goossens H (2007) Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Lactobacillus, Pediococcus and Lactococcus human isolates and cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:900–912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y (2004) Weissella confusa strain PL9001 inhibits growth and adherence of genitourinary pathogens. J Microbiol Biotechnol 14:680–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson J, Schnurer J (2001) Lactobacillus coryniformis subsp. coryniformis strain Si3 produces a broad-spectrum proteinaceous antifungal compound. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado Galdeano C, de LeBlanc A, Vinderola G, Bibas Bonet ME, Perdigón G (2007) Proposed model: mechanisms of immunomodulation induced by probiotic bacteria. Clin Vaccine Immunol 14:485–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mingeot-Leclercq MP, Glupczynski Y, Tulkens PM (1999) Aminoglycosides: activity and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:727–737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moges F, Mengistu G, Genetu A (2002) Multiple drug resistance in urinary pathogens at Gondar College of Medical Sciences Hospital, Ethiopia. East Afr Med J 79:415–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid G, Bruce AW (2006) Probiotics to prevent urinary tract infections: the rationale and evidence. World J Urol 24:28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodtong S, Tannock GW (1993) Differentiation of Lactobacillus strains by ribotyping. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3480–3484

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saarela M, Mogensen G, Fonden R, Matto J, Mattila-Sandholm T (2000) Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J Biotechnol 84:197–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stamm WE, Hooton TM (1993) Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med 329:1328–1334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velraeds MMC, van de Belt-Gritter B, Busscher HJ, Reid G, van der Mei HC (2000) Inhibition of uropathogenic biofilm growth on silicone rubber in human urine by lactobacilli—a teleologic approach. World J Urol 18:422–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhanel GG, Karlowsky JA, Harding GKM, Carrie A, Mazzulli T, Low DE, Hoban DJ (2000) A Canadian national surveillance study of urinary tract isolates from outpatients: comparison of the activities of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1089–1092

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of medical microbiology units of University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria and State Specialist Hospital, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria for their assistance in isolates collection. F.A. Ayeni wishes to acknowledge the EMBO for the short-term fellowship grant during which some part of this work was done. Part of this work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (grants: AGL2004-07285-C02-01 and Consolider FUN-C-FOD CSD2007-063) and Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (ALIBIRD: S-0505/AGR-0153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Requena.

Additional information

Communicated by Erko Stackebrandt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ayeni, F.A., Adeniyi, B.A., Ogunbanwo, S.T. et al. Inhibition of uropathogens by lactic acid bacteria isolated from dairy foods and cow’s intestine in western Nigeria. Arch Microbiol 191, 639–648 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-009-0492-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-009-0492-9

Keywords

Navigation