Advertisement

Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 189, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Populations under microevolutionary scrutiny: what will we gain?

  • Johannes Sikorski
Mini-Review

Abstract

Understanding the evolution of biodiversity and the function of biological systems are burning and linked questions in biology. Evolution of biodiversity begins at the level of microevolution, with the differentiation of individuals in populations. The study of this process splits into two conceptually different approaches (1) the concept of functional biology of testing hypothesis by precisely controlled and forward-directed experiments (digital and experimental evolution), and (2) the concept of a theory-based historical narrative (testing hypothesis on events in the past for their suitability to best explain the present). Here, I discuss and emphasize the benefits of the study of natural bacterial populations for a deeper understanding of prokaryotic biology. Also, I adress current problems in taxonomy at the ‘species’ level which obviously need discussion and clarification. I exemplify this with a natural model population for such studies, Bacillus simplex from “Evolution Canyon”, Israel.

Keywords

Microevolution Species concept Evolutionary lineage Intraspecies diversity Bacillus simplex Evolution Canyon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Fred Cohan, Eviatar Nevo, Erko Stackebrandt, Brain J. Tindall, Wilfried Wackernagel, and the DSMZ colleagues for inspiring discussions. Also, I thank Alejandro Rooney for sharing unpublished data. Finally, I thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for financial support (SI 1352/1-1).

References

  1. Adami C (2006a) Digital genetics: unravelling the genetic basis of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 7:109–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adami C (2006b) Reducible complexity. Science 312:61–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1990) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bock WJ (2004) Species: the concept, category and taxon. J Zool Syst Evol Res 42:178–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckling A, Wills MA, Colegrave N (2003) Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations. Science 302:2107–2109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohan FM (2006) Toward a conceptual and operational union of bacterial systematics, ecology, and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 361:1985–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohan FM, Perry EB (2007) A systematics for discovering the fundamental units of bacterial diversity. Curr Biol 17:R373–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Mendoza D, Schujman GE, Aguilar PS (2002) Biosynthesis and function of membrane lipids. In: Sonenshein AL (ed) Bacillus subtilis and its closest relatives: from genes to cells. ASM Press, Washington, D.C, pp 43–55Google Scholar
  9. de Queiroz K (2005) Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6600–6607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dekel E, Alon U (2005) Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature 436:588–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4:457–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser C, Hanage WP, Spratt BG (2007) Recombination and the nature of bacterial speciation. Science 315:476–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Futuyma DJ (1986) Evolutionary biology. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  15. Gevers D et al (2005) Re-evaluating prokaryotic species. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:733–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartl DL, Clark AG (1997) Principles of population genetics. 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  17. Heyrman J et al (2005) Study of mural painting isolates, leading to the transfer of ‘Bacillus maroccanus’ and ‘Bacillus carotarum’ to Bacillus simplex, emended description of Bacillus simplex, re-examination of the strains previously attributed to ‘Bacillus macroides’ and description of Bacillus muralis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:119–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchinson GE (1968) When are species necessary? In: Lewontin RC (ed) Population biology and evolution. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, pp 177–186Google Scholar
  19. Jessup CM et al (2004) Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:189–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kassen R, Llewellyn M, Rainey PB (2004) Ecological constraints on diversification in a model adaptive radiation. Nature 431:984–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Lenski RE, Ofria C, Collier TC, Adami C (1999) Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms. Nature 400:661–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lenski RE, Ofria C, Pennock RT, Adami C (2003) The evolutionary origin of complex features. Nature 423:139–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacLean RC, Bell G, Rainey PB (2004) The evolution of a pleiotropic fitness tradeoff in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8072–8077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maharjan R, Seeto S, Notley-McRobb L, Ferenci T (2006) Clonal adaptive radiation in a constant environment. Science 313:514–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayr E (1959) Where are we? Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 24:409–440Google Scholar
  27. Mayr E (1997) The objects of selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:2091–2094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayr E (2004) What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Minkoff E (1983) Evolutionary biology. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  30. Nevo E (2001) Evolution of genome-phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6233–6240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orr HA (2005) The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat Rev Genet 6:119–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pallen MJ, Matzke NJ (2006) From The origin of species to the origin of bacterial flagella. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:784–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palys T, Berger E, Mitrica I, Nakamura LK, Cohan FM (2000) Protein-coding genes as molecular markers for ecologically distinct populations: the case of two Bacillus species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50(Pt 3):1021–1028PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pennock RT (2004) On teaching evolution and the nature of science. evolutionary science and society: educating a new generation. Part I: introduction in evolutionary thinking. In: Cracraft J, Bybee RW (eds) Proceedings of the BSCS, AIBS Symposium. NABT Convention, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Pigliucci M (2005) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now? Trends Ecol Evol 20:481–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ponciano JM, De Gelder L, Top EM, Joyce P (2007) The population biology of bacterial plasmids: a hidden Markov model approach. Genetics 176:957–968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rainey PB, Travisano M (1998) Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394:69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosselló-Mora R, Amann R (2001) The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25:39–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sikorski J, Nevo E (2005) Adaptation and incipient sympatric speciation of Bacillus simplex under microclimatic contrast at “Evolution Canyons” I and II, Israel. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15924–15929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sikorski J, Nevo E (2007a) On the necessity to study natural bacterial populations—the model of Bacillus simplex from “Evolution Canyon” I and II, Israel. Isr J Ecol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  41. Sikorski J, Nevo E (2007b) Patterns of thermal adaptation of Bacillus simplex to the microclimatically contrasting slopes of “Evolution Canyon” I and II, Israel. Environ Microbiol 9:716–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson GG (1961) Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Spratt BG, Staley JT, Fisher MC (2006) Introduction: species and speciation in micro-organisms. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 361:1897–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stackebrandt E et al (2002) Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1043–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tanaka MM, Bergstrom CT, Levin BR (2003) The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing. Genetics 164:843–854PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tenaillon O, Le Nagard H, Godelle B, Taddei F (2000) Mutators and sex in bacteria: conflict between adaptive strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10465–10470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilke CO, Wang JL, Ofria C, Lenski RE, Adami C (2001) Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest. Nature 412:331–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wright S (1931) Evolution in mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright S (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. In: Proceedings of 6th International Cong Genet, vol 1, pp 356–366Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbHBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations