Archives of Microbiology

, Volume 183, Issue 3, pp 203–208 | Cite as

Sensitivity of dark mutants of various strains of luminescent bacteria to reactive oxygen species

Original Paper

Abstract

Recent studies indicated that bioluminescence of the marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi may both stimulate DNA repair and contribute to detoxification of deleterious oxygen derivatives. Therefore, it was also proposed that these reactions can be considered biological roles of bacterial luminescence and might act as evolutionary drives in development of luminous systems. However, experimental evidence for the physiological role of luciferase in protection of cells against oxidative stress has been demonstrated only in one bacterial species, raising the question whether this is a specific or a more general phenomenon. Here we demonstrate that in the presence of various oxidants (hydrogen peroxide, cumene hydroperoxide, t-butyl hydroperoxide and ferrous ions) growth of dark mutants of different strains of Vibrio fischeri and Photobacterium leiognathi is impaired relative to wild-type bacteria, though to various extents. Deleterious effects of oxidants on the mutants could be reduced (with different efficiency) by addition of antioxidants, A-TEMPO or 4OH-TEMPO. These results support the hypotheses that (1) activities of bacterial luciferases may detoxify deleterious oxygen derivatives, and (2) significantly different efficiencies of this reaction are characteristic for various luciferases.

Keywords

Bacterial luciferases Oxidative stress Antioxidants Vibrio fischeri Photobacterium leiognathi 

References

  1. Ast JC, Dunlap PV (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of the lux operon distinguishes two evolutionarily distinct clades of Photobacterium leiognathi. Arch Microbiol 181:352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cadenas E (1998) Mechanism of antioxidant action. In: Ozben T (ed) Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants. Plenum, New York, pp 237–251Google Scholar
  3. Czyż A, Węgrzyn G (2001) On the function and evolution of bacterial luminescence. In: Case JF, Herring PJ, Robinson BH, Haddock SHD, Kricka LJ, Stanley PE (eds) Bioluminescence and chemiluminescence. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 31–34Google Scholar
  4. Czyż A, Jasiecki J, Bogdan A, Szpilewska H, Węgrzyn G (2000a) Genetically modified Vibrio harveyi strains as potential bioindicators of mutagenic pollution of marine environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Czyż A, Wróbel B, Węgrzyn G (2000b) Vibrio harveyi bioluminescence plays a role in stimulation of DNA repair. Microbiology 146:283–288Google Scholar
  6. Czyż A, Plata K, Węgrzyn G (2002) Induction of light emission by luminescent bacteria treated with UV light and chemical mutagens. J Appl Genet 43:377–389Google Scholar
  7. Dunlap PV (1985) Osmotic control of luminescence and growth in Photobacterium leiognathi from ponyfish light organs. Arch Microbiol 141:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghiradella H, Schmidt JT (2004) Fireflies at one hundred plus: a new look at flash control. Integr Comp Biol 44:203–212Google Scholar
  9. Katsev AM, Węgrzyn G, Szpilewska H (2004) Effects of hydrogen peroxide on light emission by various strains of marine luminescent bacteria. J Basic Microbiol 44:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klein G, Żmijewski M, Krzewska J, Czeczatka M, Lipińska B (1998) Cloning and characterization of the dnaK heat shock operon of the marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi. Mol Gen Genet 259:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McElroy WD, Seliger HH (1962) Origin and evolution of bioluminescence. In: Kasha M, Pullman B (eds) Horizons in biochemistry. Academic, New York, pp 91–101Google Scholar
  12. Ozben T (1998) Free radicals, oxidative stress, and antioxidants. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Rees J-F, De Wergifosse B, Noiset O, Dubuisson M, Janssens B, Thompson EM (1998) The origins of marine bioluminescence: turning oxygen defence mechanisms into deep-sea communication tools. J Exp Biol 201:1211–1221Google Scholar
  14. Rosantsev E (1970) Free nitroxyl radicals. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Ruby EG, Nealson KH (1976) Symbiotic association of Photobacterium fischeri with the marine luminous fish Monocentris japonica: a model of symbiosis based on bacterial studies. Biol Bull 151:574–586Google Scholar
  16. Samuni A, Krishna MC (1997) Antioxidant properties of nitroxides and nitroxide SOD mimics. In: Packer L, Cadenas E (eds) Handbook of synthetic antioxidants. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 351–373Google Scholar
  17. Sies H (1991) Oxidative stress: oxidants and antioxidants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Skórko-Glonek J, Żurawa D, Kuczwara E, Woźniak M, Wypych Z, Lipińska B (1999) The Escherichia coli heat shock protease HtrA participates in defense against oxidative stress. Mol Gen Genet 262:342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Szpilewska H, Czyż A, Węgrzyn G (2003) Experimental evidence for the physiological role of bacterial luciferase in the protection of cells against oxidative stress. Curr Microbiol 47:379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tabatabaie T, Floyd RA (1996) Protein damage and oxidative stress. In: Holbrook NJ, Lockshin RA, Martin GRR (eds) Cellular aging and cell death. Wiley, New York, pp 35–49Google Scholar
  21. Węgrzyn G, Czyż A (2002) How do marine bacteria produce light, why are they luminescent, and can we employ bacterial bioluminescence in aquatic biotechnology? Oceanologia 44:291–305Google Scholar
  22. Wilson T, Hastings JW (1998) Bioluminescence. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 14:197–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular BiologyUniversity of GdańskGdanskPoland
  2. 2.Institute of OceanologyPolish Academy of SciencesGdyniaPoland

Personalised recommendations