Skip to main content
Log in

Ferrihydrite reduction by Geobacter species is stimulated by secondary bacteria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geobacter species such as G. bremensis, G. pelophilus, and G. sulfurreducens are obligately anaerobic and grow in anoxic, non-reduced medium by fast reduction of soluble ferric citrate. In contrast, insoluble ferrihydrite was either only slowly or not reduced when supplied as electron acceptor in similar growth experiments. Ferrihydrite reduction was stimulated by addition of a reducing agent or by concomitant growth of secondary bacteria that were physiologically and phylogenetically as diverse as Escherichia coli, Lactococcus lactis, or Pseudomonas stutzeri. In control experiments with heat-inactivated Geobacter cells and viable secondary bacteria, no (E. coli, P. stutzeri) or only little (L. lactis) ferrihydrite was reduced. Redox indicator dyes showed that growing E. coli, P. stutzeri, or L. lactis cells lowered the redox potential of the medium in a similar way as a reducing agent did. The lowered redox potential was presumably the key factor that stimulated ferrihydrite reduction by all three Geobacter species. The observed differences in anoxic non-reduced medium with ferric citrate versus ferrihydrite as electron acceptor indicated that reduction of these electron acceptors involved different cellular components or different biochemical strategies. Furthermore, it appears that redox-sensitive components are involved, and/or that gene expression of components needed for ferrihydrite reduction is controlled by the redox state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer CE, Elsen S, Bird TH (1999) Mechanisms for redox control of gene expression. Annu Rev Microbiol 53:495–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Breznak JA, Costilow RN (1994) Physicochemical factors in growth. In: Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR (eds) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, pp 137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookins DG (1988) Eh–pH diagrams for geochemistry. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caccavo F Jr, Lonergan DJ, Lovley DR, Davis M, Stolz JF, McInerney MJ (1994) Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:3752–3759

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doong R-A, Schink B (2002) Cysteine-mediated reductive dissolution of poorly crystalline iron(III) oxides by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Environ Sci Technol 36:2939–2945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg CW, Groleau D (1982) Stability of the endo-β-1,4-glucanase and β-1,4-glucosidase from Bacteroides succinogenes. Can J Microbiol 28:144–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano C, Khan AW (1984) Cellulase and sugar formation by Bacteroides cellulosolvens, a newly isolated cellulolytic anaerobe. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:446–448

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guest JR, Green J, Irvine AS, Spiro S (1996) The FNR modulon and FNR-regulated gene expression. In: Lin ECC, Lybch AS (eds) Regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Landes, Austin, pp 317–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob H-E (1970) Redox potential. In: Norris JR, Ribbons DW (eds) Methods in Microbiology, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 92–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EA, Sakajoh M, Halliwell G, Madia A, Demain AL (1982) Saccharification of complex cellulosic substrates by the cellulase system from Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol 43:1125–1132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR (1997) Microbial Fe(III) reduction in subsurface environments. FEMS Microbiol Rev 20:305–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR (2000) Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction. In: Lovley DR (ed) Environmental microbe–metal interactions. ASM, Washington, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Phillips EJP (1986) Organic matter mineralization with reduction of ferric iron in anaerobic sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 51:683–689

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevin KP, Lovley DR (2000) Potential for nonenzymatic reduction of Fe(III) via electron shuttling in subsurface sediments. Environ Sci Technol 34:2472–2478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pel R, Gottschal JC (1987) The effect of oxygen and sulfhydryl reagents on the hydrolysis and the fermentation of chitin by Clostridium 9.1. FEMS Microbiol Lett 44:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riffel A, Lucas F, Heeb P, Brandelli A (2003) Characterization of a new keratinolytic bacterium that completely degrades native feather keratin. Arch Microbiol 179:258–265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawers RG, Zalelein E, Böck A (1988) Two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analysis of Escherichia coli proteins: influence of various anaerobic growth conditions and the fnrgene product on cellular protein composition. Arch Microbiol 149:240–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PH, Hungate RE (1958) Isolation and characterization of Methanobacterium ruminatium n. sp. J Bacteriol 75:713–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snoeyenbos-West OL, Nevin KP, Anderson RT, Lovley DR (2000) Enrichment of Geobacter species in response to stimulation of Fe(III) reduction in sandy aquifer sediments. Microb Ecol 39:153–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine—a Ferrozine new spectrophotometric reagent for iron. Anal Chem 42:779–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straub KL, Buchholz-Cleven BEE (2001) Geobacter bremensis sp. nov. and Geobacter pelophilus sp. nov., two dissimilatory ferric iron reducing bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Bacteriol 51:1805–1808

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straub KL, Schink B (2003) Evaluation of electron-shuttling compounds in microbial ferric iron reduction. FEMS Microbiol Lett 220:229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straub KL, Hanzlik M, Buchholz-Cleven BEE (1998) The use of biologically produced ferrihydrite for the isolation of novel iron-reducing bacteria. System Appl Microbiol 21:442–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straub KL, Benz M, Schink B (2001) Iron metabolism in anoxic environments at near neutral pH. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 34:181–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thamdrup B (2000) Bacterial manganese and iron reduction in aquatic sediments. In: Schink B (ed) Advances in microbial ecology, vol 16. Kluwer/Plenum, New York, pp 41–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Unden G, Achebach S, Holighaus G, Tran HG, Wackwitz B, Zeuner Y (2002) Control of FNR function of Escherichia coli by O2 and reducing conditions. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 4:263–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widdel F, Bak F (1992) Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K-H (eds) The prokaryotes, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 3352–3378

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdel F, Schnell S, Heising S, Ehrenreich A, Assmus B, Schink B (1993) Ferrous iron oxidation by anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Nature 362:834–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank W.A. Schönhuber for fruitful discussions. R. Dippel, S. Gerhardt, D.R. Lovley, and D. Schmitt-Wagner are acknowledged for providing strains. This work was financed by the European Commission in the PURE project (EVK1-CT-1999-00030).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina L. Straub.

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Hans Günter Schlegel on the occasion of his 80th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Straub, K.L., Schink, B. Ferrihydrite reduction by Geobacter species is stimulated by secondary bacteria. Arch Microbiol 182, 175–181 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-004-0686-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-004-0686-0

Keywords

Navigation