Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aciduric Proteobacteria isolated from pH 2.9 soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Acidic (pH 2.9) soil was used as an inoculum to culture heterotrophic bacteria at pH values of 3–4. Four isolates were obtained; on the basis of 16S rDNA sequence, they were shown to be members of the β- and γ-Proteobacteria. The three isolates that were most closely related to Burkholderia spp. had simple nutritional requirements and could grow in glucose-mineral salts media; two of these used a broad array of organic substrates. The 16S rDNA sequence of the fourth isolate was most similar (96%) to Frateuria aurantia. The isolates were aciduric rather than acidophilic; their pH ranges for growth were approximately 3.5–8. Unlike many bacteria whose acid tolerance represents the capacity to survive acid exposure, these microorganisms carried out exponential growth at pH<4 and their growth rates at pH 3.9 ranged from 60 to 98% of those found at pH 7. The cell yields on glucose of two strains were identical at pH 4 and pH 7. The acidic soils appeared to contain a very diverse bacterial community as assessed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting of PCR amplicons of a portion of the 16S rDNA gene. Electronic supplementary material to this paper can be obtained by using the Springer LINK server located at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-002-0427-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curtis, P., Nakatsu, C.H. & Konopka, A. Aciduric Proteobacteria isolated from pH 2.9 soil. Arch Microbiol 178, 65–70 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-002-0427-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-002-0427-1

Navigation