Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimizing power system operations: integrating FACTS and ESS through advanced algorithms

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research delves into the critical realm of unit commitment in electric power systems, aiming to optimize the operation of electronic equipment, flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) devices, and energy storage systems (ESS). The synergistic integration of these components holds immense potential for enhancing system performance by reducing transmission losses, enhancing stability, regulating voltage, and modulating energy density. The study employs an advanced honeybee colony-based algorithm, elevating the efficiency of local and global searches to navigate the complex interplay between FACTS and ESS. Four distinct scenarios are meticulously analyzed: (i) the base case without storage or FACT devices; (ii) the inclusion of only FACTS; (iii) the presence of solely ESS; (iv) the combination of both FACTS and ESS devices. Through comprehensive benefits analysis and economic evaluation, our findings underscore the transformative impact of integrating FACTS and ESS on power system operations. The results not only showcase the considerable advantages in terms of system stability and efficiency but also provide valuable insights into the economic viability of such integrated solutions. This study paves the way for advanced strategies in unit commitment, offering a holistic perspective on the intricate dynamics of electronic equipment, FACTS, and energy storage in contemporary power systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Du E, Zhang N, Hodge B-M, Kang C, Kroposki B, Xia Q (2018) Economic justification of concentrating solar power in high renewable energy penetrated power systems. Appl Energy 222:649–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fiedler T (2019) Simulation of a power system with large renewable penetration. Renew Energy 130:319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghadimi N, Akbarimajd A, Shayeghi H, Abedinia O (2018) A new prediction model based on multi-block forecast engine in smart grid. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9(6):1873–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abedinia O, Bekravi M, Ghadimi N (2017) Intelligent controller based wide-area control in power system. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 25(01):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagheri M, Nurmanova V, Abedinia O, Salay Naderi M, Ghadimi N, Salay Naderi M (2019) Renewable energy sources and battery forecasting effects in smart power system performance. Energies 12(3):373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abedinia O, Zareinejad M, Doranehgard MH, Fathi G, Ghadimi N (2019) Optimal offering and bidding strategies of renewable energy based large consumer using a novel hybrid robust-stochastic approach. J Clean Prod 215:878–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammadi M, Talebpour F, Safaee E, Ghadimi N, Abedinia O (2018) Small-scale building load forecast based on hybrid forecast engine. Neural Process Lett 48(1):329–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandoman FH, Ahmadi A, Sharaf AM, Siano P, Pou J, Hredzak B, Agelidis VG (2018) Review of FACTS technologies and applications for power quality in smart grids with renewable energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82(1):502–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadush SY, Mee L (2018) DSO-TSO cooperation issues and solutions for distribution grid congestion management. Energy Policy 120:610–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kavitha K, Neela R (2018) Optimal allocation of multi-type FACTS devices and its effect in enhancing system security using BBO, WIPSO & PSO. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 5(3):777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganthia BP, Abhisikta A, Pradhan D, Pradhan A (2018) A variable structured TCSC controller for power system stability enhancement. Mater Today Proc 5(1):665–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lima RM, Novais AQ (2016) Symmetry breaking in MILP formulations for Unit Commitment problems. Comput Chem Eng 85:162–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Morales-España G, Lorca Á, de Weerdt MM (2018) Robust unit commitment with dispatchable wind power. Electr Power Syst Res 155:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cobos NG, Arroyo JM, Alguacil N, Street A (2018) Network-constrained unit commitment under significant wind penetration: a multistage robust approach with non-fixed recourse. Appl Energy 232:489–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salvini C, Monacchia S (2017) A memetic computing approach for unit commitment with energy storage systems. Energy Procedia 107:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luburić Z, Pandžić H (2019) FACTS devices and energy storage in unit commitment. Electr Power Energy Syst 104:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saranya S, Saravanan B (2018) Optimal size allocation of superconducting magnetic energy storage system based unit commitment. J Energy Storage 20:173–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saboori S, Kazemzadeh R, Saboori H (2016) Evaluating the operator risk-taking due to the wind resources and load uncertainties in thermal unit commitment problem by using conditional value at risk measure. Tabriz J Electr Eng 46(2):135–148

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ansari MR, Amjady N, Vatani B (2014) Stochastic security-constrained hydrothermal unit commitment considering uncertainty of load forecast, inflows to reservoirs and unavailability of units by a new hybrid decomposition strategy. IET J Gener Transm Distrib 8(12):1900–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao C, Wang Q, Wang J, Guan Y (2014) Expected value and chance constrained stochastic unit commitment ensuring wind power utilization. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(6):2696–2705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dvorkin Y, Pandzic H, Ortega-Vazquez MA, Kirschen DS (2015) A hybrid stochastic/interval approach to transmission-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(2):621–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Díaz G, Coto J, Gómez-Aleixandre J (2019) Optimal operation value of combined wind power and energy storage in multi-stage electricity markets. Appl Energy 235:1153–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Braun S, Hoffmann R (2016) Intraday optimization of pumped hydro power plants in the German electricity market. Energy Procedia 87:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruninx K, Dvorkin Y, Delarue E, Pandžić H, D’haeseleer W, Kirschen DS (2016) Coupling pumped hydro energy storage with unit commitment. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 7(2):786–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nasri A, Conejo AJ, Kazempour SJ, Ghandhari M (2014) Minimizing wind power spillage using an OPF with FACTS devices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29(5):2150–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zarate-Minano R, Conejo A, Milano F (2008) OPF-based security redispatching including facts devices. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2(6):821–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Energy GE (2001) Western wind and solar integration study. Tech. rep., National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden

  28. Dervis K, Ozturk C (2011) A novel clustering approach: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 11:652–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abedinia O, Wyns B, Ghasemi A (2011) Robust fuzzy PSS design using ABC. In: 2011 10th international conference on environment and electrical engineering. IEEE, pp 1–4

  30. Abedinia O, Shayanfar H, Wyns B, Ghasemi A (2011) Design of robust PSS to improve stability of composed LFC and AVR using ABC in deregulated environment. In: 13th international conference on artificial intelligence (ICAI 2011), pp 82–88

  31. Shayanfar HA, Abedinia O, Amjady N, Rajaei S (2016) Improved ABC and fuzzy controller based on consonant FACTS devices. In: Proceedings on the international conference on artificial intelligence (ICAI), p. 60. The Steering Committee of the World Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Applied Computing (WorldComp)

  32. Armaghani S, Amjady N, Abedinia O (2015) Security constrained multi-period optimal power flow by a new enhanced artificial bee colony. Appl Soft Comput 37:382–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pandžić H, Wang Y, Qiu T, Dvorkin Y, Kirschen DS (2015) Near-optimal method for siting and sizing of distributed storage in a transmission network. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(5):2288–2300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. https://matpower.org/docs/ref/matpower5.0/case118.html

Download references

Funding

Basic Research Support Program for Excellent Young Teachers in Heilongjiang Province (YQJH2023210).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Electrical and Information, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, Heilongjiang, China

    Lijunyi Zhao & Donghui Wei

  2. College of Intelligent Manufacturing Engineering, Harbin Huade University, Harbin, 150025, Heilongjiang, China

    Na Zhang

Authors
  1. Lijunyi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donghui Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Na Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Methodology, software, validation, and formal analysis were performed by Lijunyi Zhao; validation, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation were presented by Na Zhang; conceptualization, supervision, and project administration were provided by Donghui Wei.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghui Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Human or animals rights

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Wei, D. & Zhang, N. Optimizing power system operations: integrating FACTS and ESS through advanced algorithms. Electr Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02428-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02428-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation