Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrated energy optimization scheduling with active/passive demand response and reward and punishment ladder carbon trading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increase in energy demand and carbon emission requirements, energy management and CO2 emission reduction on the user side are significant for integrated energy system (IES) scheduling. This paper constructs a two-stage optimal dispatching model combining active/passive demand response (DR) and reward and punishment ladder-type carbon trading. In the first stage, the electricity/gas load was optimized by adding a logistics function to the active DR model. A passive DR model is built based on the optimized electric load and the heat/cooling–electricity ratio of the cogeneration unit to optimize the heat/cooling load. In the second stage, a multi-objective IES model based on the optimized load and reward and punishment ladder carbon trading was solved by the golden eagle multi-objective optimization (MOGEO). Analyzing the scheduling results from different scenarios, the active/passive DR model can reduce the load peak-to-valley difference and improve user satisfaction and grid revenue. At the same time, the combination of reward and punishment ladder carbon trading makes the system gain more carbon revenue, reduces system operating costs and carbon emissions, and improves energy utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Jinghua L, Mengshu Z, Yuejiang L (2021) Review on optimal scheduling of integrated energy systems. Power Syst Technol 45(06):2256–2272

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fang J, Zeng Q, Ai X (2017) Dynamic optimal energy flow in the integrated natural gas and electrical power systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 9(1):188–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin X, Shen X, Sun H (2019) A quasi-dynamic model and corresponding calculation method for integrated energy system with electricity and heat. Energy Procedia 158:6413–6418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang C, Peng Z, Zheng W (2021) Multiple time scales scheduling strategy of wind power accommodation considering energy transfer characteristics of carbon capture power plant. Proc CSEE 41(3):946–960

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mansouri SA, Ahmarinejad A, Javadi MS (2020) Two-stage stochastic framework for energy hubs planning considering demand response programs. Energy 206:118124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, Wang W, Wang H (2021) Hybrid time-scale energy optimal scheduling strategy for integrated energy system with bilateral interaction with supply and demand. Appl Energy 285:116458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li N, Wang X, Zhu Z et al (2020) The reliability evaluation research of distribution system considering demand response. Energy Rep 6:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tao Z, Jing L, Xiaolei Y (2021) Economic dispatch of microgrid considering active/passive demand response and conditional value at risk. High Voltage Eng 47(09):3292–3304

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhongfu AT (2015) The optimization model for multi-type customers assisting wind power consumptive considering uncertainty and demand response based on robust stochastic theory. Energy Convers Manag 105:1070–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tianyuan F, Haiyun W, Weiqing W (2022) Coordinated optimization scheduling of microgrid and distribution network based on cooperative game considering active/passive demand respons. Power Syst Technol 46(02):453–463

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shibo Y, Liang S, Lidong C (2021) Coordinated optimal scheduling of distribution network with CCHP-based microgird considering time-of-use electricity price. Electric Power Autom Equip 41(04):15–23

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liying W, Jialin L, Honqi D (2022) Optimal dispatch of integrated energy system considering ladder-type carbon trading. J Syst Simul 34(07):1393–1404

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dengyong C, Fang L, Shuai L (2022) Optimization of virtual power plant scheduling coupling with P2G-CCS and doped with gas hydrogen based on stepped carbon trading. Power Syst Technol 46(06):2042–2054

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiaohui Z, Xiaoyan L, Jiaqing Z (2020) Integrated energy system planning considering a reward and punishment ladder-type carbon trading and electric-thermal transfer load uncertainty. Proc CSEE 40(19):6132–6142

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rui W, Shan C, Ye L (2022) Master-slave game optimal scheduling of energy hub based on integrated demand response and a reward and punishment ladder carbon trading mechanism. Power Syst Protect Control 50(08):75–85

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rong H, Milu Z, Zhenkun L (2018) Optimal operation for CCHP system considering shiftable loads. Power Syst Technol 42(03):715–721

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhisheng Z, Daolin Y (2018) RBF-NN based short-term load forecasting model considering comprehensive factors affecting demand response. Proc CSEE 38(06):1631–1638

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tianyuan F, Haiyun W, Weiqing W (2022) Coordinated optimization scheduling of microgrid and distribution network based on cooperative game considering active/passive demand response. Power Syst Technol 46(02):453–463

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammadi-Balani A, Nayeri MD, Azar A, Taghizadeh-Yazdi M (2020) Golden eagle optimizer: a nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. Comput Ind Eng 152:107050

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors thank the project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52007103).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Tao Zhang and Jin Wang wrote the main manuscript text and prepared figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee. Written informed consent for participation and publication of this paper was obtained from the College of Electrical Engineering and New Energy, China Three Gorges University, State Grid Hubei Electric Power Research Institute, and all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no potential financial or personal conflict of interest with the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Wang, J., Mei, X. et al. Integrated energy optimization scheduling with active/passive demand response and reward and punishment ladder carbon trading. Electr Eng 105, 2923–2934 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01865-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-023-01865-9

Keywords

Navigation