Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

State of charge estimation for Li-ion battery based intelligent algorithms

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

State of charge (SOC) is a crucial index for a battery’s energy assessment. Its estimation is becoming an increasing challenge in order to assure the battery's safety and efficiency. To this end, many methods can be found in the scientific literature with various accuracy and complexity. However, accurate SOC is highly dependent on the adopted methodology. This paper investigates five methods for estimating battery SOC for lithium-ion (Li-ion) manufacturers. For this purpose, five methods were selected and then used in practice, including the modified Coulomb counting method, the extended Kalman filter, the neural network (NN), and two other techniques based on machine learning known as the support vector machines and the K-nearest neighbor algorithm (KNN), respectively. A detailed analysis based on statistical assessment is performed on an experimental test that covers multiple cycles of charge and discharge modes. The KNN method proved to be more accurate than the EKF approach, which is extensively used for estimating the SOC of Li-ion batteries. The algorithm demonstrated great predictive accuracy, with most predictions having a relative error near zero and a maximum error value of roughly 0.26%. All of the findings validate the methodology's reliability and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knutel B, Pierzyńska A, Dȩbowski M, Bukowski P, Dyjakon A (2020) Assessment of energy storage from photovoltaic installations in Poland using batteries or hydrogen. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13154023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Álvarez Antón JC, García Nieto PJ, de Cos Juez FJ, Sánchez Lasheras F, González Vega M, Roqueñí Gutiérrez MN (2013) Battery state-of-charge estimator using the SVM technique. Appl Math Model 37(9):6244–6253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rivera-Barrera JP, Muñoz-Galeano N, Sarmiento-Maldonado HO (2017) Soc estimation for lithium-ion batteries: review and future challenges. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics6040102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Codani P, Perez Y, Petit M (2015) Electric vehicles as a mobile storage device. Handb Clean Energy Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118991978.hces217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian MD, Wagner N, Gorini R (2018) The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strateg Rev 24:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Erdinc O, Vural B, Uzunoglu M (2009) A dynamic lithium-ion battery model considering the effects of temperature and capacity fading. In: 2009 International conference on clean electrical power, ICCEP 2009, pp 383–386, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEP.2009.5212025

  7. Asian Development Bank (2018) Handbook on battery energy storage system. https://www.adb.org/publications/battery-energy-storage-system-handbook

  8. Xiong R, Yang R, Chen Z, Shen W, Sun F (2020) Online fault diagnosis of external short circuit for lithium-ion battery pack. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 67(2):1081–1091. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2899565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng Y, Ouyang M, Han X, Lu L, Li J (2018) Investigating the error sources of the online state of charge estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. J Power Sources 377:161–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.11.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Waag W, Fleischer C, Sauer DU (2014) Critical review of the methods for monitoring of lithium-ion batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles. J Power Sources 258:321–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Y, Gao G, Li X, Chen Z (2020) A fractional-order model-based state estimation approach for lithium-ion battery and ultra-capacitor hybrid power source system considering load trajectory. J Power Sources 449:227543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu X, Sun F, Zou Y (2010) Estimation of state of charge of a lithium-ion battery pack for electric vehicles using an adaptive luenberger observer. Energies 3(9):1586–1603. https://doi.org/10.3390/en3091586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen X, Shen W, Cao Z, Kapoor A (2014) A novel approach for state of charge estimation based on adaptive switching gain sliding mode observer in electric vehicles. J Power Sources 246:667–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.08.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xia B et al (2018) Online parameter identification of lithium-ion batteries using a novel multiple forgetting factor recursive least square algorithm. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang H, Miao Q, Zhang X, Liu Z (2018) An improved unscented particle filter approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life prediction. Microelectron Reliab 81(24):288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2017.12.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu J, Mi CC, Cao B, Deng J, Chen Z, Li S (2014) The state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on a proportional-integral observer. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 63(4):1614–1621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2013.2287375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He X et al (2020) Experimental study of self-heating ignition of lithium-ion batteries during storage: effect of the number of cells. Fire Technol 56(6):2649–2669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-020-01011-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiong R, Li Z, Yang R, Shen W, Ma S, Sun F (2022) Fast self-heating battery with anti-aging awareness for freezing climates application. Appl Energy 324(5):119762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang C, Wang S, Wu B, Fernandez C, Xiong X, Coffie-Ken J (2021) A state-of-charge estimation method of the power lithium-ion battery in complex conditions based on adaptive square root extended Kalman filter. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kai W, Xiao F, Jinbo P, Jun R, Chongxiong D, Liwei L (2020) State of charge (SOC) estimation of lithium-ion battery based on adaptive square root unscented Kalman Filter. Int J Electrochem Sci 15(9):9499–9516. https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.09.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jia Y et al (2022) Parameter identification method for a fractional-order model of lithium-ion batteries considering electrolyte-phase diffusion. Batteries 8(8):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries8080090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou D, Zhang K, Ravey A, Gao F, Miraoui A (2016) Parameter sensitivity analysis for fractional-order modeling of lithium-ion batteries”. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9030123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zou C, Hu X, Dey S, Zhang L, Tang X (2018) Nonlinear fractional-order estimator with guaranteed robustness and stability for lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(7):5951–5961. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2782691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xing L, Wu X, Ling L, Lu L, Qi L (2022) Lithium battery SOC estimation based on multi-innovation unscented and fractional order square root cubature Kalman filter. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. She C, Zhang L, Wang Z, Sun F, Liu P, Song C (2021) Battery state of health estimation based on incremental capacity analysis method: synthesizing from cell-level test to real-world application. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3112754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu X, Feng F, Liu K, Zhang L, Xie J, Liu B (2019) State estimation for advanced battery management: key challenges and future trends. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 114:109334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang K, Tang Y, Zhang Z (2021) Parameter identification and state-of-charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using separated time scales and extended kalman filter. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14041054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ng KS, Moo CS, Chen YP, Hsieh YC (2009) Enhanced coulomb counting method for estimating state-of-charge and state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries. Appl Energy 86(9):1506–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Coleman M, Lee CK, Zhu C, Hurley WG (2007) State-of-charge determination from EMF voltage estimation: using impedance, terminal voltage, and current for lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 54(5):2550–2557. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2007.899926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chandran V, Patil CK, Karthick A, Ganeshaperumal D, Rahim R, Ghosh A (2021) State of charge estimation of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles using machine learning algorithms. World Electr Veh J. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12010038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cells LB, Rahimi-eichi H, Member S, Baronti F (2014) Online adaptive parameter identification and state-of-charge coestimation for. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(4):2053–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pattipati B, Sankavaram C, Pattipati KR (2011) System identification and estimation framework for pivotal automotive battery management system characteristics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 41(6):869–884. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2089979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim J, Lee S, Cho BH (2011) Discrimination of Li-ion batteries based on Hamming network using discharging-charging voltage pattern recognition for improved state-of-charge estimation. J Power Sources 196(4):2227–2240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li SG, Sharkh SM, Walsh FC, Zhang CN (2011) Energy and battery management of a plug-in series hybrid electric vehicle using fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 60(8):3571–3585. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2011.2165571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dai H, Wei X, Sun Z, Wang J, Gu W (2012) Online cell SOC estimation of Li-ion battery packs using a dual time-scale Kalman filtering for EV applications. Appl Energy 95:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tong S, Klein MP, Park JW (2015) On-line optimization of battery open circuit voltage for improved state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation. J Power Sources 293:416–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.03.157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu X, Li S, Peng H (2012) A comparative study of equivalent circuit models for Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources 198:359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stefanopoulou AG, Kim Y (2015) System-level management of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78242-090-3.00010-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ding X, Zhang D, Cheng J, Wang B, Luk PCK (2019) An improved Thevenin model of lithium-ion battery with high accuracy for electric vehicles. Appl Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Almeida GCS, Souza ACZ, Ribeiro PF (2020) A Neural Network Application for a Lithium-Ion Battery Pack State-of-Charge Estimator with Enhanced Accuracy. Proceedings 58(1):33. https://doi.org/10.3390/wef-06915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sande S, Privalsky ML (1996) Identification of TRACs (T3 receptor-associating cofactors), a family of cofactors that associate with, and modulate the activity of, nuclear hormone receptors. Mol Endocrinol 10(7):813–825. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.10.7.813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen GH, Shah D (2018) Explaining the success of nearest neighbor methods in prediction. FNT in Mach Learn 10:5–6. https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000064

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely acknowledges for the material support provided by the laboratory team in the Renewable Energy Equipment (EER) division of the UDES/CDER Solar Equipment Development Unit located in Bousmail/Tipaza.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The originality of this paper is concerning both theoretical and experimental techniques; it is described as follows: Experimental study of off-grid PV system with Li-ion battery storage is done. Comparative study between five SOC algorithms is carried out. Detailed statistical analysis for a Li-ion battery is discussed. Taylor diagram is performed for the analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aicha Degla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors whose names are listed above certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

The work described above is approved by all authors and explicitly of the responsible authorities where the work was carried out: the Photovoltaic Energy Application Laboratory, Renewable Energy Equipment Division of the UDES/CDER Solar Equipment Development Unit, located in Bousmail/TIPAZA. In addition, this work will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher, if accepted.

Consent to participate

I would like again to state the agreement by all authors of this article for the submission and publication of the manuscript under consideration of the Journal of Electrical Engineering, Springer.

Consent to Publish

I confirm the agreement by all authors the publication of the considered manuscript to the Journal of Electrical Engineering, Springer.

Availability of data and material

All the data supported by this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available they contain information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Degla, A., Chikh, M., Mzir, M. et al. State of charge estimation for Li-ion battery based intelligent algorithms. Electr Eng 105, 1179–1197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01728-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01728-9

Keywords

Navigation