Skip to main content
Log in

Reliable risk-level assessment criteria for vacuum circuit breakers in operation based on transient earth voltage measurements

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Power-on inspection (POI) is a method to detect abnormalities in vacuum circuit breakers (VCBs) in a live wire state. However, owing to the absence of clear assessment criteria, POI cannot often be applied to assess the condition of VCBs in operation. Therefore, this paper presents novel risk-level assessment criteria for POI using transient earth voltage (TEV) measurements for in-service VCBs. In particular, vacuum interrupters and push-rod defects are artificially manufactured and inserted in each phase of a VCB. Additionally, a vacuum chamber with a structure similar to that of an actual VCB, with variable pressure from 0.133 to 101,325 Pa (1 atm), is fabricated, and TEV measurement data are collected. In addition, on-site measurement results are analyzed and applied to strengthen the basis of the assessment criteria. Thus, the assessment criteria for VCBs in service and defect type estimation are obtained based on an analysis of the experimental and on-site results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not Applicable.

References

  1. Nakano Y, Kozako M, Hikita M et al (2019) Estimation method of degraded vacuum in vacuum interrupter based on partial discharge measurement. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 26:1520–1526. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdei.2019.008142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Falkingham LT, Reeves R, Mistry S, Gill CH (2012) A study of vacuum levels in a sample of long service vacuum interrupters. In: 2012 25th international symposium on discharges and electrical insulation in vacuum (ISDEIV). IEEE

  3. Okawa M, Tsutsumi T, Aiyoshi T (1987) Reliability and field experience of vacuum interrupters. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2:799–804. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.1987.4308181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamarol M, Ohtsuka S, Hikita M et al (2007) Determination of gas pressure in vacuum interrupter based on partial discharge. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 14:593–599. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdei.2007.369518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakaoka T, Tai Y, Kamarol M, et al (2014) Development of partial discharge detection and diagnostic methods of vacuum circuit breaker. In: 2014 international symposium on discharges and electrical insulation in vacuum (ISDEIV). IEEE

  6. Deng X, Li W, Liu B (2011) Discharge properties and diagnosis of gas pressure in vacuum interrupter. In: 2011 IEEE power engineering and automation conference. IEEE

  7. Habibie AS, Hikita M, Kozako M, et al (2019) Detecting vacuum degree condition of vacuum interrupter by partial discharge measurement. In: 2019 5th international conference on electric power equipment—switching technology (ICEPE-ST). IEEE

  8. Kojima H, Donen T, Kimura T, Hayakawa N (2020) Diagnosis of discharge pattern in vacuum interrupter by shield potential measurement. In: 2020 8th international conference on condition monitoring and diagnosis (CMD). IEEE

  9. Su H-B, Mo W-X, Wang Y, et al (2020) The online monitoring system of vacuum degree in high voltage vacuum circuit breakers based on electromagnetic wave method. In: 2020 IEEE international conference on high voltage engineering and application (ICHVE). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHVE49031.2020.9279978

  10. Janssen H, Hinrichsen V, Taylor ED, Rettenmaier T (2019) Comparison of arc motion in different lifetime sealed vacuum interrupters with RMF contacts. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci IEEE Nucl Plasma Sci Soc 47:3525–3532. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2019.2917295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shi W, Wang L, Lin R et al (2019) Experimental investigation of drawing vacuum arc under different TMF contacts in vacuum interrupter. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci IEEE Nucl Plasma Sci Soc 47:1827–1834. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2019.2903557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shemshadi A (2019) Modeling of plasma dispersion process in vacuum interrupters during postarc interval based on FEM. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci IEEE Nucl Plasma Sci Soc 47:647–653. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2018.2879519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhao J, Zhang J, Liu Z, Gan Z (2015) Measurement of TEV of 1000 kV UHV gas insulated switchgear. In: 2015 7th Asia-Pacific conference on environmental electromagnetics (CEEM). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368693

  14. Subramaniam A, Raman SJ, Panda SK (2021) Comparison of partial discharge signal in a three phase transformer by UHF, TEV and HFCT sensors. In: 2021 1st international conference on power electronics and energy (ICPEE). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPEE50452.2021.9358502.

  15. Yao M (2010) The application of temporary Earth voltage (TEV) measurement in the online monitoring of the partial discharge of HV switch cabinet, China International Conference on Electricity Distribution, pp 1–6

  16. Fan W, Guan S, Yin H, et al (2016) PD pattern recognition based on transient earth voltage (TEV) pulse amplitude-frequency of occurrence diagrams for switchgears. In: 2016 IEEE electrical insulation conference (EIC). IEEE

  17. Ren M, Dong M, Ren Z et al (2012) Transient earth voltage measurement in PD detection of artificial defect models in $\hboxSF_6$. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci IEEE Nucl Plasma Sci Soc 40:2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2012.2199135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang W, Zhang C, Dong M, Zhou J (2017) Research on partial discharge monitoring system of switchgear based on wireless distributed TEV sensors. In: 2017 1st international conference on electrical materials and power equipment (ICEMPE). IEEE

  19. National Natural Science Foundation of China (2021) Study on the Paschen curve of air discharge under repetitive pulse voltage. In: 2021 IEEE 4th international electrical and energy conference (CIEEC). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIEEC50170.2021.9511037.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research was performed with the support of Korea Electrical Safety Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JMP was involved in investigation, methodology, resources, validation and writing an original draft. GRH was involved in software and visualization. JCJ was involved in conceptualization. HSL was involved in data curation. DHC prepared measurements. JMP, JCJ, HSL and DHC prepared figures and review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ga Ram Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Not Applicable.

Informed consent

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.M., Jeon, J.C., Han, G.R. et al. Reliable risk-level assessment criteria for vacuum circuit breakers in operation based on transient earth voltage measurements. Electr Eng 105, 593–603 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01676-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-022-01676-4

Keywords

Navigation