Abstract
Modern power sector requires grid observability under all scenarios for its ideal functioning. This enforces the operator to incorporate state estimation solutions based on a priori measurements to deduce the corresponding operating states of the grid. The key principle for such aforementioned algorithms lies on an occurrence of an over determined class of system having an ample redundancy in the measurements. Operators employ state forecasting solutions to counter the loss of real-time measurements. This work encompasses a critical comparison between several machine learning models along with ARIMA and time delayed neural network architecture for proper forecasting of operating states under normal as well as contingency scenarios. To showcase the efficacy of the proposed approach, this work incorporates a comprehensive comparison between them based on RMSE, MSE and MAE index. Copula-based synthetic data generation based on Gaussian multivariate distribution of the a priori measurements and operating states along with optimal hyper-parameter tuning of the models have shown the effectiveness of such algorithms in predicting future state estimates. The proposed machine learning models can be also seen to showcase an effective forecasting strategy under varying noise scenarios. This work also showcases the implementation of the models for real-time state forecasting strategy having computational times in the order of micro seconds. All the simulations have been carried out on the standard IEEE 14 bus test bench to support the former proposals.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The data sets are available from the corresponding author on request.
Code availability
The custom code is available from the corresponding author on request.
Abbreviations
- AHFASE:
-
Asynchronous hierarchical forecasting-aided state estimator
- ARIMA:
-
Autoregressive integrated moving average
- DSE:
-
Dynamic state estimator
- EGPR:
-
Exponential Gaussian process regression
- FGSVM:
-
Fine Gaussian support vector machine
- GPR:
-
Gaussian process regression
- L-G:
-
Line-to-ground
- LL-G:
-
Double line-to-ground
- LLL-G:
-
Three phase-to-ground
- MAE:
-
Mean absolute error
- MGSVM:
-
Medium Gaussian support vector machine
- MSE:
-
Mean squared error
- PDC:
-
Phasor data concentrator
- PDF:
-
Probability distribution function
- PMUs:
-
Phasor measurement units
- PSSE:
-
Power system state estimator
- RLR:
-
Robust linear regression
- RMSE:
-
Root mean squared error
- RSE:
-
Robust state estimator
- RTDS:
-
Real-time digital simulator
- SEGPR:
-
Squared exponential Gaussian process regression
- SVM:
-
Support vector machine
- SCADA:
-
Supervisory control and data acquisition
- TDNN:
-
Time delayed neural network
- WLS:
-
Weighted least squares
References
Schweppe FC, Wildes J (1970) Power system static-state estimation, part I: exact model. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1:120–125
Schweppe FC, Rom DB (1970) Power system static-state estimation, part II: approximate model. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1:125–130
Schweppe FC (1970) Power system static-state estimation, part III: implementation. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 1:130–135
Larson RE, Tinney WF, Peschon J (1970) State estimation in power systems part I: theory and feasibility. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 3:345–352
Larson RE, Tinney WF, Hajdu LP, Piercy DS (1970) State estimation in power systems part II: implementation and applications. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 3:353–363
Zhang L, Kekatos V, Giannakis GB (2016) Scalable electric vehicle charging protocols. IEEE Trans Power Syst 32(2):1451–1462
Debs AS, Larson RE (1970) A dynamic estimator for tracking the state of a power system. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 7:1670–1678
Morvaj Z (1985) A mathematical model of an electric power system for dynamic state estimation. Electric Power Syst Res 8(3):207–217
Blood EA, Krogh BH, Ilic MD (2008) Electric power system static state estimation through Kalman filtering and load forecasting. In: IEEE, pp 1–6
Durgaprasad G, Thakur SS (1998) Robust dynamic state estimation of power systems based on M-estimation and realistic modeling of system dynamics. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(4):1331–1336
Hassanzadeh M, Evrenosoğlu CY (2012) Power system state forecasting using regression analysis. In: IEEE, pp 1–6
Da Silva AL, Do Coutto Filho MB, De Queiroz JF (1983) State forecasting in electric power systems. IET Gener Transm Distrib 130(5):237–244
Hassanzadeh M, Evrenosoğlu CY, Mili L (2015) A short-term nodal voltage phasor forecasting method using temporal and spatial correlation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(5):3881–3890
Talebi Ghadikolaee E, Kazemi A, Shayanfar HA (2020) Multi-area state estimation in a distribution network using Takagi-Sugeno model estimated by Kalman filter. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 30:e12466
Do Coutto Filho MB, de Souza JC, Glover JD (2019) Roots, achievements, and prospects of power system state estimation: a review on handling corrupted measurements. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 29(4):e2779
Do Coutto Filho MB, de Souza JC, Freund RS (2009) Forecasting-aided state estimation—part II: implementation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(4):1678–1685
Do Coutto Filho MB, de Souza JC (2009) Forecasting-aided state estimation—part I: panorama. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(4):1667–1677
Sinha AK, Mondal JK (1999) Dynamic state estimator using ANN based bus load prediction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14(4):1219–1925
Goleijani S, Ameli MT (2018) Neural network-based power system dynamic state estimation using hybrid data from SCADA and phasor measurement units. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 28(2):e2481
Ranković A, Maksimović BM, Sarić AT, Lukič U (2015) ANN-based correlation of measurements in micro-grid state estimation. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 25(10):2181–2202
Zhang L, Wang G, Giannakis GB (2019) Real-time power system state estimation and forecasting via deep unrolled neural networks. IEEE Trans Signal Process 67(15):4069–4077
Zhang L, Wang G, Giannakis GB (2018) Real-time power system state estimation via deep unrolled neural networks. In: IEEE, pp 907–911
Carcangiu S, Fanni A, Pegoraro PA, Sias G, Sulis S (2020) Forecasting-aided monitoring for the distribution system state estimation. Complexity 2020:1–15
Geetha SJ, Sharma A, Chakrabarti S (2019) Unscented Rauch–Tung–Streibel smoother-based power system forecasting-aided state estimator using hybrid measurements. IET Gener Transm Distrib 13(16):3583–3590
Kundu S, Alam M, Roy BS, Thakur SS (2020) Comparison of Various Smoothing Parameter Techniques for Forecasting Power System States. In: IEEE, pp 212–217
Kumar DMV, Srivastava SC (1999) Power system state forecasting using artificial neural networks. Electric Mach Power Syst 27(6):653–664
Antončič M, Ilkovski M, Blažič B (2019) State forecasting in distribution networks. In: IEEE, pp 1–5
Zufferey T, Renggli S, Hug G (2020) Probabilistic state forecasting and optimal voltage control in distribution grids under uncertainty. Electric Power Syst sRes 188:106562
Ma W, Qiu J, Liu X, Xiao G, Duan J, Chen B (2019) Unscented Kalman filter with generalized correntropy loss for robust power system forecasting-aided state estimation. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 15(11):6091–6100
Khosravi M, Banejad M, Shandiz HT (2016) Forecast aided measurements data synchronisation in robust power system state estimation. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(10):2379–2388
Geetha SJ, Chakrabarti S, Rajawat K, Terzija V (2019) An asynchronous decentralized forecasting-aided state estimator for power systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(4):3059–3068
Sharma A, Samantaray SR (2018) Power system tracking state estimator for smart grid under unreliable PMU data communication network. IEEE Sens J 18(5):2107–2116
Sharma A, Srivastava SC, Chakrabarti S (2017) A cubature Kalman filter based power system dynamic state estimator. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 66(8):2036–2045
Zhao J, Zhang G, Dong ZY, La Scala M (2016) Robust forecasting aided power system state estimation considering state correlations. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(4):2658–2666
He Y, Henze J, Sick B (2020) Forecasting power grid states for regional energy markets with deep neural networks. In: IEEE, pp 1–8
Ji X, Yin Z, Zhang Y, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhang C, Wang D (2021) Real-time robust forecasting-aided state estimation of power system based on data-driven models. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 125:106412
Jahic A, Konjic T, Jahic A (2016) Forecast-aided distribution system state estimation. In: IET, pp 1–5
Geetha SJ, Chakrabarti S, Rajawat K (2020) Asynchronous hierarchical forecasting-aided state estimator with sub-area data validation for power systems. IEEE Sens J 21(2):2124–2133
Cheng C, Bai X (2021) Robust forecasting-aided state estimation in power distribution systems with event-triggered transmission and reduced mixed measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst
Jaman S, Mazumder MRR, Ahmed MI, Rahman AAM (2019) Forecasting-aided state estimation for power distribution system application: case study. In: IEEE, pp 473–478
Alhalali S, El-Shatshat R (2019) Foretasting-aided state estimator for an electrical distribution system. In: IEEE, pp 1–5
Kekatos V, Wang G, Zhu H, Giannakis GB (2020) PSSE redux: convex relaxation, decentralized, robust, and dynamic solvers. Adv Electric Power Energy Static State Estim 171–208
Zhao J, Gómez-Expósito A, Netto M, Mili L, Abur A, Terzija V, Kamwa I, Pal B, Singh AK, Qi J, Huang Z (2019) Power system dynamic state estimation: motivations, definitions, methodologies, and future work. IEEE Trans Power Syst 34(4):3188–3198
Ahmad F, Rasool A, Ozsoy E, Sekar R, Sabanovic A, Elitaş M (2018) Distribution system state estimation—a step towards smart grid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2659–2671
Eghbali O, Kazemzadeh R, Amiri K (2020) Multi-area state estimation based on PMU measurements in distribution networks. J Oper Autom Power Eng 8(1):65–74
Yu Y, Wang Z, Lu C (2018) A joint filter approach for reliable power system state estimation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 68(1):87–94
Wang Y, Sun Y, Dinavahi V (2019) Robust forecasting-aided state estimation for power system against uncertainties. IEEE Trans Power Syst 35(1):691–702
Zhao J, Netto M, Huang Z, Yu S, Gomez-Exposito A, Wang S, Kamwa I, Akhlaghi S, Mili L, Terzija V, Meliopoulos AS (2020) Roles of Dynamic State Estimation in Power System Modeling, Monitoring and Operation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
Bhusal N, Gautam M (2020) Power system dynamic state estimation using extended and unscented Kalman filters. arXiv:2012.06069
Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2010) Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. Mplus Tech Append 2010:1–10
Abur A, Exposito AG (2004) Power system state estimation: theory and implementation. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Monticelli A (2012) State estimation in electric power systems: a generalized approach. Springer, Berlin
Gao Y, Hu X, Liu H (2010) Estimation of distribution algorithm based on multivariate Gaussian copulas. In: IEEE, no 1, pp 254–257
Shirzadi A, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Bui DT, Pham BT, Shahedi K, Ahmad BB (2017) A comparative study between popular statistical and machine learning methods for simulating volume of landslides. CATENA 157:213–226
Shi JQ, Choi T (2011) Gaussian process regression analysis for functional data. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(6):2560–2574
Bose D, Chanda CK, Chakrabarti A (2020) Vulnerability assessment of a power transmission network employing complex network theory in a resilience framework. Microsyst Technol 26:2443–2451
Bhonsle JS, Deshpande SB, Renge MM, Harne RV (2004) A new approach for determining weakest bus and voltage stability margin in a power system. In: NPSC, pp 102–107
Mukherjee D, Chakraborty S, Guchhait PK, Bhunia J (2020) Machine learning based solar power generation forecasting with and without MPPT controller. In: IEEE, pp 44–48
Mukherjee D, Chakraborty S, Guchhait PK, Bhunia J (2020) Application of machine learning for speed and torque prediction of PMS motor in electric vehicles. In: IEEE, pp 129–133
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
No funding has been received for this particular research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have equally contributed for analysis and interpretation of the results and data, drafting the article or revising it critically and preparing the final version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukherjee, D., Chakraborty, S. & Ghosh, S. Power system state forecasting using machine learning techniques. Electr Eng 104, 283–305 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01328-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01328-z