Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding charge trap characteristics of epoxy nanocomposite under steep fronted lightning impulse voltage

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Charge trap characteristics of epoxy spacer insulating material due to surface flashover are important for improving the stable operation of GIS. In this work, magnesium oxide (MgO) filled epoxy nanocomposite material is proposed as the spacer material and its performance is compared with pure epoxy. The surface properties of spacer materials were altered using surface flashovers generated due to standard lightning impulse (LI) and steep fronted lightning impulse (SFLI) having front time of 0.1 µs, using rod plane electrode setup. The impact of surface flashovers on charge trap characteristics were analysed through surface and space charge studies. The surface charge behaviour was estimated by surface potential decay and their trap characteristics, space charge accumulation was measured using pulsed electro acoustic technique. SFLI flashover voltage was lower compared to LI voltages and MgO filled epoxy nanocomposite had higher flashover voltage compared to pure epoxy. The space charge density of MgO filled epoxy nanocomposite was less compared to pure epoxy after treating with LI/SFLI flashover voltages. MgO filled epoxy nanocomposite had enhanced surface potential decay and reduced trap energy after surface flashover. Due to the superior insulating properties, MgO filled epoxy nanocomposite can be used as the spacer material in GIS components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolon DA (1995) Epoxy chemistry for electrical insulation. IEEE Electr Insul Mag 11(4):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujinami H, Takuma T, Yashima M et al (1989) Mechanism And effect of DC charge accumulation on SF6 gas insulated spacers. IEEE Power Eng Rev 9(7):62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li C, Lin C, Zhang B et al (2018) Understanding surface charge accumulation and surface flashover on spacers in compressed gas insulation. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 25(4):1152–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adnan MM, Tveten EG, Glaum J et al (2019) Epoxy-based nanocomposites for high-voltage insulation: a review. Adv Electron Mater 5(2):1800505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka T, Imai T (2017) Advanced nanodielectrics: fundamentals and applications. CRC Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhong SL, Dang ZM, Zhou WY et al (2018) Past and future on nanodielectrics. IET Nanodielectrics 1(1):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andritsch T, Kochetov R, Morshuis PH et al (2010) Dielectric properties and space charge behavior of MgO-epoxy nanocomposites. In: 2010 10th IEEE international conference on solid dielectrics. IEEE, pp 1–4

  8. Yanashima R, Hirai N, Ohki Y (2017) Effects of addition of MgO fillers with various sizes and co-addition of nano-sized SiO2 fillers on the dielectric properties of epoxy resin. In: 2017 international symposium on electrical insulating materials (ISEIM). IEEE, vol 2, pp 650–653

  9. Wu K, Wang Z, Zhao C et al (2018) Surface treeing and segmented worm model of tracking behavior in MgO/Epoxy nanocomposites. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 25(6):2067–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ge G, Tang Y, Li Y et al (2020) Effect of environmental temperature on the insulating performance of epoxy/MgO nanocomposites. Appl Sci 10(20):7018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xing Z, Zhang C, Hu X et al (2019) Surface tracking of MgO/epoxy nanocomposites: effect of surface hydrophobicity. Appl Sci (Switzerland) 9(3):413

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hornak J, Trnka P, Kadlec P et al (2018) Magnesium oxide nanoparticles: dielectric properties, surface functionalization and improvement of epoxy-based composites insulating properties. Nanomaterials 8(6):381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andritsch T, Kochetov R, Lennon B et al (2011) Space charge behavior of magnesium oxide filled epoxy nanocomposites at different temperatures and electric field strengths. In: 2011 electrical insulation conference (EIC). IEEE, pp 136–140

  14. Okubo H (1994) Recent activity and future trend on ageing characteristics of electrical insulation in GIS from manufacturer's view point. In: Proceedings of 1994 4th international conference on properties and applications of dielectric materials (ICPADM). IEEE, vol 2, pp 837–840

  15. Chen J, Zhou W, Yu J et al (2013) Insulation condition monitoring of epoxy spacers in GIS using a decomposed gas CS2. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 20(6):2152–2157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao X, Yao X, Guo Z et al (2011) Characteristics and development mechanisms of partial discharge in SF6 gas under impulse voltages. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 39(2):668–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Okabe S, Ueta G, Utsumi T et al (2015) Insulation characteristics of GIS insulators under lightning impulse with DC voltage superimposed. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 22(6):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang LC, Wan YJ, Yan D et al (2013) The effect of graphene dispersion on the mechanical properties of graphene/epoxy composites. Carbon 60:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guvvala N, Rao BN, Sarathi R (2019) Effect of gamma irradiation on space charge and charge trap characteristics of epoxy–MgO nanocomposites. Micro Nano Lett 14(13):1334–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chillu N, Jayaganthan R, Rao BN et al (2019) Investigation on space charge and charge trap characteristics of Al–epoxy nanocomposites. IET Sci Meas Technol 14(2):146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guvvala N, Sarathi R (2018) Partial discharge activity due to particle movement in SF6 gas filled electrode gap under different voltage profiles. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 25(4):1429–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peddamallu N, Nagaraju G, Sarathi R (2019) Understanding the electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of epoxy magnesium oxide nanocomposites. IET Sci Meas Technol 13(5):632–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ning X, Xiang Z, Peng Z et al (2013) Effect of UV ageing on space charge characteristics of epoxy resin and its nanocomposites. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on solid dielectrics (ICSD). IEEE, pp 784–787

  24. Guo Y, Du BX, Xiao M et al (2014) Effects of adding rate on dc tracking failure of epoxy/MgO nano-composites under contaminated conditions. In: Proceedings of 2014 international symposium on electrical insulating materials. IEEE, pp 473–476

  25. Du BX, Guo YG, Liu Y et al (2014) Effects of adding nanofiller on DC tracking failure of epoxy/MgO nano-composites under contaminated conditions. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 21(5):2146–2155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhuang Y, Chen G, Chappell PH et al (2012) Surface potential decay: effect of different corona charging times. In: 2012 annual report conference on electrical insulation and dielectric phenomena. IEEE, pp. 620–623

  27. Xu Z, Zhang L, Chen G (2007) Decay of electric charge on corona charged polyethylene. J Appl Phys D 40:7085–7089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Simmons JG, Tam MC (1973) Theory of isothermal currents and the direct determination of trap parameters in semiconductors and insulators containing arbitrary trap distributions. Phys Rev B 7(8):3706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kozako M, Fuse N, Tanaka T (2004) Surface degradation of polyamide nanocomposites caused by partial discharges using IEC (b) electrodes. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 11(5):833–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou F, Li J, Liu M et al (2016) Characterizing traps distribution in LDPE and HDPE through isothermal surface potential decay method. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 23(2):1174–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kindersberger J, Lederle C (2008) Surface charge decay on insulators in air and sulfurhexafluorid-part II: measurements. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 15(4):949–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gao Y, Li Z, Wang M et al (2019) Magnetic field induced variation in surface charge accumulation behavior on epoxy/Al2O3 nanocomposites under DC stress. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 26(3):859–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhan Z, Zhang Q, Xie Q (2019) Effect of the surface roughness of epoxy resin on its creeping flashover characteristics in C4F7N-CO2 gas mixtures. AIP Adv 9(4):045129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is funded by Central Power Research Institute, India under Grant No. CPRI/R&D/TANS/2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kavitha Arunachalam.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadam, Y.R., Guvvala, N., Arunachalam, K. et al. Understanding charge trap characteristics of epoxy nanocomposite under steep fronted lightning impulse voltage. Electr Eng 104, 567–576 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01322-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01322-5

Keywords

Navigation