Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of photometric and electrical measurements of residential light sources

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of light sources that provides lighting with electrical energy has a history of about 200 years and it has still been continuing today. Over the time, different light sources have been developed by the use of different technologies. Eventually, a large product inventory comprised from light sources in different structures and characteristics has been obtained. Residential lighting is an important field in the sector in terms of appealing large number of users and a wide range of application areas. In addition, lighting quality is prioritized in residential buildings, because people get more closely exposed to artificial light in those places. In this study, the most commonly used eight different light sources in residential buildings have been investigated. The selected light sources are comprised of the products from halogen, CFL and LED lighting technologies. All the light sources have been chosen with equivalent luminous flux values. The selected light sources have been subjected to photometric and electrical measurements realized simultaneously under the same ambient conditions. The interactions between photometric parameters and the meaning of these magnitudes in terms of users have been tried to be explained in an explanatory language. For the same purpose, electrical parameters have been also examined and their meanings terms of both the user and system have been given. Based on the results obtained, evaluation of the light sources selected from different technologies have been provided sophisticatedly and their suitability in terms of users and systems have been discussed. In the last part, the loading efficacy value has been examined and reference has been made to the appropriateness of the use of this value in expressing the efficiency of the light sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

θ Vn :

Phase angle of nth degree voltage

θ In :

Phase angle of nth degree current

φ n :

Phase difference between voltage and current of nth degree component

THDV :

Voltage total harmonic distortion

THDI :

Current total harmonic distortion

λ :

Wavelength

lm :

Lumen

W :

Watt

VA:

Volt-ampere

CCT:

Correlated color temperature

RSD:

Relative spectral distribution

LEDs:

Light emitting diodes

CFL:

Compact fluorescent lamp

LCA:

Life cycle assessment

RGB:

Red, green, blue

CW:

Cold white

WW:

Warm white

References

  1. Guarnieri M (2018) An historical survey on light technologies. IEEE Access 6:25881–25897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole M, Driscoll T (2014) The lighting revolution: if we were experts before, we’re novices now. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 50(2):1509–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 2005 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-using products and amending Council Directive 92/42/EEC and Directives 96/57/EC and 2000/55/EC

  4. Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 of 18 March 2009 implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for non-directional household lamps

  5. Commission Regulation (EC) No 245/2009 of 18 March 2009 implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for fluorescent lamps without integrated ballast, for high intensity discharge la

  6. Tan Q, Li J (2016) Potential mercury emissions from fluorescent lamps production and obsolescence in mainland China. Waste Manag Res 34(1):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim S-R, Kang D, Ogunseitan OA, Schoenung JM (2013) Potential environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. Environ Sci Technol 47(2):1040–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kruisselbrink T, Dangol R, Rosemann A (2018) Photometric measurements of lighting quality: an overview. Build Environ 138:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu X, Houser KW (2003) Spectral and electrical performance of screw-based dimmable compact fluorescent lamps. Light Res Technol 35(4):331–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. di Mauro S, Musumeci S, Raciti A (2017) Analysis of electrical and photometric quantities of CFL and LED bulb lamps. In: 2017 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 2017, pp 1–8

  11. Di Mauro S, Raciti A, Rizzo SA, Susinni G, Musumeci S (2018) Effects of the aging time on CFL and LED lamps: experimental tests on the electrical and photometric quantities. In: 2018 AEIT International Annual Conference, 2018, pp 1–6

  12. Königs S, Mayr S, Buchner A (2019) A common type of commercially available LED light source allows for colour discrimination performance at a level comparable to halogen lighting. Ergonomics 62(11):1462–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zalesinska M, Szwedek S, Pawlak A (2018) Evaluation of lighting parameters at the workplace with the use replacements for incandescent lamps. In: 2018 VII. Lighting conference of the Visegrad Countries (Lumen V4), 2018, pp 1–5

  14. Baleja R, Sumpich J, Bos P, Helstynova B, Sokansky K, Novak T (2015) Comparison of LED properties, compact fluorescent bulbs and bulbs in residential areas. In: 2015 16th international scientific conference on electric power engineering (EPE), 2015, pp 566–571

  15. Pawlak A, Zalesińska M (2017) Comparative study of light sources for household. Manag Syst Prod Eng 25(1):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rubinger RM, da Silva ER, Pinto DZ, Rubinger CPL, Oliveira AF, da Costa BE (2015) Comparative and quantitative analysis of white light-emitting diodes and other lamps used for home illumination. Opt Eng 54(1):014104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kralikova R, Wessely E (2016) Lighting quality, productivity and human health. Ann DAAAM Proc 27:0059–0065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens RG, Brainard GC, Blask DE, Lockley SW, Motta ME (2014) Breast cancer and circadian disruption from electric lighting in the modern world. CA Cancer J Clin 64(3):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ticleanu C, Littlefair P (2017) A summary of LED lighting impacts on health. Int J Sustain Light 17:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jou JH et al (2020) Unveiling the mythical candles. Build Environ 2020(169):106565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Azizi M, Golmohammadi R, Aliabadi M (2016) Comparative analysis of lighting characteristics and ultraviolet emissions from commercial compact fluorescent and incandescent lamps. J Res Health Sci 16(4):200

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ronnberg SK, Bollen MHJ, Wahlberg M (2010) Harmonic emission before and after changing to LED and CFL—Part I: Laboratory measurements for a domestic customer. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference on harmonics and quality of power—ICHQP 2010, 2010, pp. 1–7.

  23. Rönnberg SK, Wahlberg M, Bollen MHJ (2010) Harmonic emission before and after changing to LED and CFL—Part II: Field measurements for a hotel. In: ICHQP 2010—14th international conference on harmonics and quality of power, 2010.

  24. Majithia C, Desai A, Panchal A (2011) Harmonic analysis of some light sources used for domestic lighting. Light Res Technol 43(3):371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bollen MHJ, Ronnberg SK, Larsson EOA, Wahlberg M, Lundmark CM (2011) Harmonic emission from installations with energy-efficient lighting. In: 11th international conference on electrical power quality and utilisation, 2011, pp 1–6

  26. Sharma H, Sunderman WG, Gaikwad A (2011) Harmonic impacts of widespread use of CFL lamps on distribution systems. In: 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2011, pp 1–5

  27. Matvoz D, Maksic M (2012) Comparison of LED and CFL lamps and their impact on electric power network. In: 2012 IEEE 15th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power, 2012, pp 320–327

  28. Islam MS, Chowdhury NA, Sakil AK, Khandakar A, Iqbal A, Abu-Rub H (2015) Power quality effect of using incandescent, fluorescent, CFL and LED lamps on utility grid. In 2015 First Workshop on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy (SGRE), 2015, pp 1–5

  29. Blanco AM, Stiegler R, Meyer J (2013) Power quality disturbances caused by modern lighting equipment (CFL and LED). In: IEEE Grenoble Conference 2013, pp 1–6

  30. Tetri E (2015) Characteristics of retrofit lamps for incandescent lamps. Light Eng 23(3):29–34

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shahzad K et al (2015) Comparative life cycle analysis of different lighting devices. Chem Eng Trans 45:631–636

    Google Scholar 

  32. de Souza DF, da Silva PPF, Fontenele LFA, Barbosa GD, de Oliveira Jesus M (2019) Efficiency, quality, and environmental impacts: a comparative study of residential artificial lighting. Energy Rep 5:409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Principi P, Fioretti R (2014) A comparative life cycle assessment of luminaires for general lighting for the office—compact fluorescent (CFL) vs light emitting diode (LED)—a case study. J Clean Prod 83:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. IES Testing Procedure Committee (2008) Approved method: electrical and photometric measurements of solid-state lighting products, IES LM-79-08. Illumination Engineering Society of North America, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lighthouse PV (2019) Solar spectrum calculator (Online). Available: http://www.pvlighthouse.com.au/index.aspx. Accessed 28 Nov 2019

  36. Munsell Color Science Laboratuvary (2019) Useful color data (Online). Available: https://www.rit.edu/science/munsell-color-science-lab-educational-resources#useful-color-data. Accessed 28 Nov 2019.

  37. Nizamoglu S, Erdem T, Demir HV (2011) High scotopic/photopic ratio white-light-emitting diodes integrated with semiconductor nanophosphors of colloidal quantum dots. Opt Lett 36(10):1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. IEC The International Electrotechnical Commission (2002) Tungsten halogen lamps (non vehicle)—Performance specifications

  39. IEC The International Electrotechnical Commission (2016) Self-ballasted compact fluorescent lamps for general lighting services—Performance requirements

  40. IEC The International Electrotechnical Commission (2012) Self-ballasted LED lamps for general lighting services with supply voltages > 50 V—Performance requirements

  41. Sommer C et al (2008) Tailoring of the color conversion elements in phosphor-converted high-power leds by optical simulations. IEEE Photonics Technol Lett 20(9):739–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hassan T, Javed F, Arshad N (2014) An empirical investigation of V-I trajectory based load signatures for non-intrusive load monitoring. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(2):870–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. EN 61000-3-2: Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) part 3-2: Limits—Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current <= 16 A per phase)

  44. Ru D (2010) IEEE standard definitions for the measurement of electric power quantities under sinusoidal, nonsinusoidal, balanced, or unbalanced conditions. IEEE Std 1459-2010 (Revision IEEE Std 1459-2010) 40(3):1–50

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadir Doğanşahin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doğanşahin, K., Ayaz, R., Bozkurt, A. et al. Assessment of photometric and electrical measurements of residential light sources. Electr Eng 103, 2075–2086 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01217-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-021-01217-5

Keywords

Navigation