Skip to main content
Log in

An asynchronous MATE-multirate method for the modeling of electric power systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multiarea Thévenin equivalent (MATE) solution framework is used in this work to combine several subsystems, which are solved using different multiple and non-multiple time-step sizes. In the proposed asynchronous MATE-multirate (A-MATE-multirate) solution, each subsystem is solved with the integration step size that is most adequate for its own internal time constants. This paper relaxes the requirement of previous multirate techniques, in which the solution time-steps of different systems must be multiples or submultiples of each other. To this end, this paper introduces the concept of asynchronous updating, in which each subsystem is updated according to its own internal clock. This updating process is performed in a closed-form solution, with external subsystems represented by their interpolated Thévenin equivalents. Interpolation with future values without using extrapolation is possible in the electromagnetic transients program solution because the history source for future time-steps is calculated at previous time-steps. The exchange of information between subsystems is conditioned using filters to avoid numerical problems during the decimation of the fast subsystems and the interpolation of the slow subsystems. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is verified with examples using multiple and non-multiple time-step sizes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watanabe M, Karplus M (1995) Simulations of macromolecules by multiple time-step methods. J Phys Chem 99:5680–5697. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100015a061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks BR et al (2009) CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 30:1545–1614. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kranc GM (1957) Input–output analysis of multirate feedback system. IRE Trans Autom Control AC 3:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1957.1104783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalman RE, Bertram JE (1959) A unified approach to the theory of sampling systems. J Frankl Inst 267:405–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(59)90093-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gear CW (1974) Multirate methods for ordinary differential equations. Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Report UIUCDCS-F-74-880. Accessed 09 Mar 2020

  6. Heffernan M, Turner K, Arrillaga J, Arnold C (1981) Computation of AC–DC system disturbances—Part I. Interactive coordination of generator and converter transient models. IEEE Trans Power App Syst 100:4341–4348. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1981.316825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reeve J, Adapa R (1988) A new approach to dynamic analysis of AC networks incorporating detailed modelling of DC systems I principles and implementation. IEEE Trans Power Deliv PD 3:2005–2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/61.194011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson GWJ, Watson NR, Arnold CP, Arrillaga J (1995) A new hybrid algorithm for analysis of HVDC and FACTS systems. Proc IEEE of the Int Conf Energy Manag Power Deliv 2:462–467. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMPD.1995.500772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Semlyen A, de León F (1993) Computation of electromagnetic transients using dual or multiple time steps. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8:1274–1281. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.260867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreira F, Martí J (2005) Latency techniques for time-domain power system transients simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:246–253. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2004.841223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moreira FA, Martí JR, Zanetta LC, Linares LR (2006) Multirate simulations with simultaneous-solution using direct integration methods in a partitioned network environment. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap 53:2765–2778. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSI.2006.882821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martí JR, Linares LR, Calviño J, Dommel HW, Lin J (1998) OVNI: an object approach to real-time power system simulators. In: POWERCON '98. 1998 international conference on power system technology, Beijing, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPST.1998.729230

  13. Linares LR (2000) OVNI, object virtual network integrator: a new fast algorithm for the simulation of very large electric networks in real time. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Comput. Eng., Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  14. Martí, JR, Linares, LR, Hollman JA, Moreira FA (2002) OVNI: integrated software/hardware solution for real-time simulation of large power systems. In: Power systems computation conference (PSCC), Seville, Spain. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/OVNI%3A-Integrated-Software%2FHardware-Solution-for-of-Mart%C3%AD-Linares/a3b56f85b68014d204316e2c48bab84c94e4b754

  15. van der Meer AA, Gibescu M, van der Meijden MAMM, Kling WL, Ferreira JA (2015) Advanced hybrid transient stability and EMT simulation for VSC-HVDC systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 30:1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2384499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. . Haddadi A, Mahseredjian J and Dufour C (2016) Time warping method for accelerated EMT simulations. In: Power systems computation conference (PSCC), Genoa, Italy, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2016.7541022

  17. IEEE Task Force on Interfacing Techniques for Simulation Tools et al. (2018) Interfacing power system and ICT simulators: Challenges, state-of-the-Art, and case studies. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2016.2542824

  18. Duan T, Shen Z, Dinavahi V (2019) Multi-rate mixed-solver for real-time nonlinear electromagnetic transient emulation of AC/DC networks on FPGA-MPSoC architecture. IEEE Power Energy Technol Syst J 6:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPETS.2019.2933250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dommel HW (1996) EMTP Theory Book, 2nd edn. Microtran Power System Analysis Corporation, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kron G (1963) Diakoptics piecewise solution of large-scale systems. MacDonald, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ho CW, Ruehli AE, Brennan PA (1975) The modified nodal approach to network analysis. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 22:504–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCS.1975.1084079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Proakis JG, Manolakis DG (2006) Digital signal processing, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schafer RW, Rabiner LR (1973) A digital signal processing approach to interpolation. Proc IEEE 61:692–702. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1973.9150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schafer RW (2011) On the frequency-domain properties of Savitzky–Golay filter. Digital signal processing and signal processing education meeting (DSP/SPE), Sedona, AZ. 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSP-SPE.2011.5739186

  25. Matlab (2015b) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States

  26. Galván VA, Martí JR, Dommel HW, Gutiérrez-Robles JA, Naredo JL (2016) MATE multirate modelling of power electronic converters with mixed integration rules. In: Power systems computation conference (PSCC) Genoa, Italy, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/PSCC.2016.7540945

  27. Moreira FA, Marti JR (2003) Latency suitability for the time-domain simulation of electromagnetic transients through network Eigen analysis. In: Proceedings of. International Conference on Power Systems Transients (IPST), in New Orleans, USA. https://ipstconf.org/papers/Proc_IPST2003/03IPST03a-04.pdf

  28. Hollman JA, Martí JR (2010) Step-by-step eigenvalue analysis with EMTP discrete-time solutions. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25:1220–1231. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2039810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Siqueira JCG, Bonatto BD, Martí JR, Hollman JA, Dommel HW (2015) A discussion about optimum time step size and maximum simulation time in EMTP-based programs. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 72:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martí JR, Lin J (1989) Suppression of numerical oscillations in the EMTP. IEEE Trans Power Syst 4:739–747. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.193849

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Bañuelos-Cabral.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galván-Sánchez, V.A., Martí, J.R., Bañuelos-Cabral, E.S. et al. An asynchronous MATE-multirate method for the modeling of electric power systems. Electr Eng 103, 993–1007 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-01128-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-020-01128-x

Keywords

Navigation