Abstract
The protection of multi-terminal HVDC systems by means of hybrid circuit breakers is a challenge because without coordination between the circuit breakers some unfaulted sections of the system could be disconnected. This paper proposes a new hybrid circuit breaker operation that accounts for the response of all circuit breakers installed to protect a multi-terminal HVDC system in order to coordinate them and avoid a false operation. The paper also includes the optimum selection of the main circuit breaker parameters installed to protect a multi-terminal HVDC system. The application of the procedure, based on a parallel MATLAB-EMTP application previously presented by the authors, shows that the resulting ranges of parameter values that optimize circuit breaker operations when the goal is to protect a multi-terminal HVDC system can be different from those obtained for a two-terminal system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bucher MK, Wiget R, Andersson G, Franck CM (2014) Multiterminal HVDC networks—What is the preferred topology? IEEE Trans Power Deliv 29(1):406–413
Häfner J, Jacobson B (2012) Device and method to break the current of a power transmission or distribution line and current limiting arrangement. Patent Appl EP 2502248:A1
Häfner J, Jacobson B (2011) Proactive hybrid HVDC breakers—a key innovation for reliable HVDC grids. CIGRE, Paris
Callavik M, Blomberg A, Häfner J, Jacobson B (2012) The hybrid HVDC breaker—an innovation breakthrough enabling reliable HVDC grids. ABB Grid Systems, Technical Paper
Bucher MK, Franck CM (2016) Fault current interruption in multiterminal HVDC networks. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 31(1):87–95
Martinez JA, Magnusson J (2015) EMTP modeling of hybrid HVDC breakers. IEEE PES general meeting, pp 1–5
Hassanpoor A, Häfner J, Jacobson B (2014) Technical assessment of load commutation switch in hybrid HVDC breaker. In: IPEC
Lin W, Jovcic D, Nguefeu S, Saad H (2016) Modelling of high-power hybrid DC circuit breaker for grid-level studies. IET Power Electron 9(2):237–246
Martinez-Velasco JA, Magnusson J (2017) Parametric analysis of the hybrid HVDC circuit breaker. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 84:284–295
Corea-Araujo JA, Martinez-Velasco JA, Magnusson J (2017) Optimum design of hybrid HVDC circuit breakers using a parallel genetic algorithm and a MATLAB-EMTP environment. IET Gener Transm Distrib 11:2974–2982
Saad H, Dennetiere S, Mahseredjian J et al (2014) Modular multilevel converter models for electromagnetic transients. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 9(3):1481–1489
Bucher MK, Franck CM (2013) Contribution of fault current sources in multiterminal HVDC cable networks. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 28(3):1796–1803
Bucher MK, Franck CM (2014) Comparison of fault currents in multiterminal HVDC grids with different grounding schemes. IEEE PES general meeting
Cámara M, Ortega J, de Toro F (2009) A single front genetic algorithm for parallel multi-objective optimization in dynamic environments. Neurocomputing 72(16):3570–3579
Farina M, Deb K, Amato P (2004) Dynamic multiobjective optimization problems: test cases, approximations, and applications. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 8(5):425–442
de Toro F, Ortega J, Ros E et al (2004) PSFGA: parallel processing and evolutionary computation for multiobjective optimization. Parallel Comput 30(5):721–739
Buehren M (2007) MATLAB library for parallel processing on multiple cores’, copyright. http://www.mathworks.com
Reeve J (1980) Multiterminal HVDC power systems. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 99(2):729–737
Acknowledgements
This work has been supported by the project ESPE, within the KIC InnoEnergy consortium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corea-Araujo, J.A., Martinez-Velasco, J.A. Coordination and optimum design of hybrid circuit breakers for operation in multi-terminal HVDC systems. Electr Eng 100, 2603–2616 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-018-0719-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-018-0719-3