Electrical Engineering

, Volume 100, Issue 2, pp 763–785 | Cite as

Modeling and control of an interconnected combined cycle gas turbine using fuzzy and ANFIS controllers

  • Mostafa A. Elhosseini
  • Ragab A. El Sehiemy
  • Amgad H. Salah
  • M. A. Abido
Original Paper
  • 168 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the dynamic modeling of an interconnected two equal area of conventional combined cycle gas turbine. In addition, fuzzy logic controllers have been designed and applied to improve speed/load control, temperature control, and air flow control. The coordination between fuzzy- controlled speed signal and fuzzy-controlled temperature control signal has been considered in the design process using fuzzy fuel controller in order to compute the accurate control signal to the fuel system for fast response against the system disturbance. On the other hand, the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) controller is investigated for controlling the model parameter and selection of the proper rule base in order to improve the proposed controller performance. The results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model with fuzzy logic controller and ANFIS over the conventional model under normal and abnormal conditions. Moreover, the proposed controllers improve effectively the system damping characteristics after a load deviation as the settling time is greatly reduced.

Keywords

Combined cycle gas turbine Fuzzy logic Frequency drop Dynamic response ANFIS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. M. A. Abido would like to acknowledge the support of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) through the Electrical Power and Energy Systems Research Group.

References

  1. 1.
    Finn J, Wagner J, Bassily H (2010) Monitoring strategies for a combined cycle electric power generator. Appl Energy 87(8):2621–2627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demirören A (2002) Application of a self-tuning to automatic generation control in power system including SMES units. Eur Trans Electr Power 12(2):101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abraham RJ, Das D, Patra A (2007) Automatic generation control of an interconnected hydrothermal power system considering superconducting magnetic energy storage. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 29(8):571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saikia LC et al (2011) Automatic generation control of a multi area hydrothermal system using reinforced learning neural network controller. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(4):1101–1108MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alomoush MI (2010) Load frequency control and automatic generation control using fractional-order controllers. Electr Eng 91(7):357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Demirören A, Kent S, Günel T (2002) A genetic approach to the optimization of automatic generation control parameters for power systems. Eur Trans Electr Power 12(4):275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golpira H, Bevrani H (2011) Application of GA optimization for automatic generation control design in an interconnected power system. Energy Convers Manag 52(5):2247–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghoshal SP (2004) Application of GA/GA-SA based fuzzy automatic generation control of a multi-area thermal generating system. Electr Power Syst Res 70(2):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhatt P, Roy R, Ghoshal SP (2010) GA/particle swarm intelligence based optimization of two specific varieties of controller devices applied to two-area multi-units automatic generation control. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32(4):299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gozde H, Taplamacioglu MC (2011) Automatic generation control application with craziness based particle swarm optimization in a thermal power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(1):8–16Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghoshal SP (2004) Optimizations of PID gains by particle swarm optimizations in fuzzy based automatic generation control. Electr Power Syst Res 72(3):203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khodabakhshian A, Hooshmand R (2010) A new PID controller design for automatic generation control of hydro power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32(5):375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nikpey H, Assadi M, Breuhaus P (2013) Development of an optimized artificial neural network model for combined heat and power micro gas turbines. Appl Energy 108:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalogirou SA (2000) Applications of artificial neural-networks for energy systems. Appl Energy 67(1):17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeynelgil HL, Demiroren A, Sengor NS (2002) The application of ANN technique to automatic generation control for multi-area power system. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 24(5):345–354Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Demirören A, Zeynelgil HL, Sengör NS (2003) The application of NN technique to automatic generation control for the power system with three areas including SMES units. Eur Trans Electr Power 13(4):227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bhongade S, Gupta HO, Tyagi B (2010) Artificial neural network based automatic generation control scheme for deregulated electricity market. In: IPEC, 2010 conference proceedings. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Khuntia SR, Panda S (2012) Simulation study for automatic generation control of a multi-area power system by ANFIS approach. Appl Soft Comput 12(1):333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar TB, Vani M (2014) Load frequency control in two area power system using ANFIS. IISTE 5:27–35Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Subbaraj P, Manickavasagam K (2008) Automatic generation control of multi-area power system using fuzzy logic controller. Eur Trans Electr Power 18(3):266–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Demiroren A, Yesil E (2004) Automatic generation control with fuzzy logic controllers in the power system including SMES units. Electr Power Energy Syst 26:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mazhabjafari M, Jafari Ali M, Saidabadi K (2011) Notice of retraction modeling and simulation of combined cycle power plants participating in network frequency control. In: Power engineering and automation conference (PEAM), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, pp 112–115Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Iliescu Sergiu ST et al (2008) Gas turbine modeling for load-frequency control. In: Scientific Bulletin, University POLITEHNICA Bucharest. Ser C Electr Eng 70:4Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang Q, SO PL (2000) Dynamic modeling of a combined cycle plant for power system stability studies. In: Power engineering society winter meeting, 2000. IEEE. IEEE, pp 1538–1543Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tică A, Guéguen H, Dumur D, Faille D, Davelaar F (2012) Design of a combined cycle power plant model for optimization. Appl Energy 98:256–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sasaki T, Enomoto K (2002) Dynamic analysis of generation control performance standards. IEEE Trans Power Syst 17:806–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baba K, Kakimoto N (2003) Dynamic behavior of a combined cycle power plant in the presence of a frequency drop. Electr Eng Jpn 143:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ning CN, Lu CN (2006) Effects of temperature control on combined cycle unit output response. In: TENCON 2006. 2006 IEEE region 10 conference. IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kalantar M (2010) Dynamic behavior of a stand-alone hybrid power generation system of wind turbine, microturbine, solar array and battery storage. Appl Energy 87(10):3051–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saikia LC, Sahu SK (2013) Automatic generation control of a combined cycle gas turbine plant with classical controllers using firefly algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weimin K et al (2011) Study on the mathematical model and primary frequency regulation characteristics of combined cycle plants. In: 2011 second international conference on mechanic automation and control engineering (MACE). IEEE, pp 2632–2635Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gao L, Xia J, Dai Y (2010) Modeling of combined cycle power plant based on a genetic algorithm parameter identification method. In: 2010 sixth international conference on natural computation (ICNC). IEEE, pp 3369–3373Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Najimi I, Ramezani MH (2012) Robust control of speed and temperature in a power plant gas turbine. ISA Trans 51(2):304–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Obara S (2015) Dynamic-characteristics analysis of an independent microgrid consisting of a SOFC triple combined cycle power generation system and large-scale photovoltaics. Appl Energy 141:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sánchez-Parra M, De-Lara-Jayme S, Bahamaca-Fernández LJ (2002) A fuzzy-logic rule based speed and load controller for combustion turbines in power generation. In: American control conference, 2002. Proceedings of the 2002. IEEE. pp 2659–2664Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aboel-ela M, Fetoh A, Gamal AB (2011) Fuzzy speed controllers of combined cycle power plants. Int J Innov Electr Power Syst 3(2):109–121Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanchez-Parra M et al (2012) Intelligent coordinated control for combined cycle power plants. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on control applications (CCA). IEEE, pp 148–153Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hosseini SH, Etemadi AH (2008) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based automatic generation control. Electr Power Syst Res 78(7):1230–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rowen WI (1983) Simplified mathematical representations of heavy-duty gas turbines. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 105(4):865–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rowen WI (1992) Simplified mathematical representations of single shaft gas turbines in mechanical drive service. Turbomach Int 33:5Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shalan HEMA, Hassan MA, Moustafa Bahgat ABG (Dec. 2010) Comparative study on modeling of gas turbines in combined cycle power plants. In: Proceedings of the 14th international middle east power systems conference (MEPCON’10), Cairo University, Egypt, pp 970–976Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kunitomi K et al (2001) Modeling frequency dependency of gas turbine output. In: Power engineering society winter meeting, 2001. IEEE. IEEE, pp 678–683Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    De Mello FP et al (1994) Dynamics models for combines cycle plants in power system studies. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(3):1698–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hannett LN, Khan A (1993) Combustion turbine dynamic model validation from tests. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(1):152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kakimoto N, Baba K (2003) Performance of gas turbine-based plants during frequency drops. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(3):1110–1115Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rai JN et al (2013) Performance analysis of CCGT power plant using MATLAB/Simulink based simulation. Int J Adv Technol 2:285–290Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Amgad H Salah, Mostafa A Elhosseini, Ragab A El Sehiemy, Kamal M Shebl (2015) Fuzzy-based modeling and control of combined cycle gas turbine plants. In: 17th international middle east power systems conference, December 15–17Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Raduca M et al (2011) Fuzzy controller for adjustment of liquid level in the tank. Ann Univ Craiova Math Comput Sci Ser 38(4):33–43MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mostafa A. Elhosseini
    • 1
  • Ragab A. El Sehiemy
    • 2
    • 5
  • Amgad H. Salah
    • 3
  • M. A. Abido
    • 4
  1. 1.Computers Engineering and Control Systems DepartmentMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  2. 2.Electrical Engineering DepartmentKafrelsheikh UniversityKafrelsheikhEgypt
  3. 3.Electrical Power and Machines Engineering DepartmentMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  4. 4.Electrical Engineering DepartmentKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia
  5. 5.Intelligent Systems Research Group (ISRG)Kafrelsheikh UniversityKafrelsheikhEgypt

Personalised recommendations