Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Performance and cost comparison of reluctance motors used for electric bicycles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electric bicycles have come to be of public interest due to the awareness of energy preservation and environment. The regulations in many European countries limit the maximum electric motor power to 250 W, which assists the rider up to a bicycle velocity of 25 km/h. Due to the high market competition, electric bicycles are highly cost-sensitive. Currently, most of the electric bicycles use a brushless DC (BLDC) motor due to its compact size and high efficiency. An obvious drawback of a BLDC motor for electric bicycles is the necessity of expensive permanent magnets. Furthermore, the uncertain development of the permanent magnet price also leads to the commercial risk of the product. As a result, the motor concepts without permanent magnets could reduce significant costs and the commercial risk. This paper investigates the feasibility of reluctance motors for replacing BLDC motors in electric bicycles in terms of performances and material costs. The study focuses on two types of reluctance motors, switched reluctance motor and synchronous reluctance motor, which will be compared with a commercial benchmark BLDC motor. The considered reluctance motors will be designed to fulfill the entire torque–speed range of electric bicycles. The motor performances are calculated by design software together with simulation models using the finite element (FE) method. The material cost analysis is done based on the current market prices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. EN Standard (2009) Electrically power assisted cycles—EPAC bicycles, DIN EN 15194:2009-06

  2. Muetze A, Tan YC (2007) Electric bicycles—a performance evaluation. IEEE Ind Appl Mag 13(4):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Starschich E, Muetze A (2007) Comparison of the performances of different geared brushless-dc motor drives for electric bicycles. Proc IEEE Electr Mach Drives Conf 1:140–147

  4. Muetze A, Jack A, Mecrow B (2001) Brushless DC motor using soft magnetic composites as a direct drive in an electric bicycle. Proc Eur Conf Power Electr Appl 1–7

  5. Magnet Energy, [Online]. Available: http://www.magnetnrg.com/news1/according-to-wwwmetal-pagescom-that-the-prices-of-nd-and-dy-metals-have-essentially-not-been-changed-since-june-2014-and-which-may-be-a-sign-of-price-stabilization-for-rare-earth-and-rare-earth-magnets-the-data-are-compiled-by-christina-h-chen. Accessed 9 July 2015

  6. Argus Rare Earths Monthly Outlook, [Online]. Available: http://www.argusmedia.com/metals/~/media/B7B5A601C4A14B4C9121355572F9C392.ashx. Accessed 9 July 2015

  7. Fujishiro S, Ishikawa K, Kikuchi S, Nakamura K, Ichinokura O (2006) Design of outer-rotor-type multipolar switched reluctance motor for electric vehicle. J Appl Phys 99(8):07R324-3–08R324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiyota K, Chiba A (2012) Design of switched reluctance motor competitive to 60 kW IPMSM in third-generation hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 48(6):2303–212309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller TJE, Hutton A, Cossar C, Staton DA (1991) Design of a synchronous reluctance motor drive. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 27(4):741–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vagati A (1994) The synchronous reluctance solution: a new alternative in AC drives. Proc IECON’94 Ind Electr Control Instrum 1:1–13

  11. Lipo TA (1991) Synchronous reluctance machines—a viable alternative for AC drives? Electr Mach Power Syst 19(9):659–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller TJE (2002) Optimal design of switched reluctance motors. IEEE Trans Ind Electr 49(1):15–27

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Krishnan R, Arumugam R, Lindsay JF (1988) Design procedure for switched reluctance motors. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 24(3):456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Radun AV (1995) Design considerations for the switched reluctance motor. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 31(5):1079–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Staton DA, Miller TJE, Wood SE (1991) Optimization of the synchronous reluctance motor geometry. In: Proceeding of 5th international conference on electrical machines and drives. IET, London, pp 156–160

  16. Staton DA, Miller TJE, Wood SE (1993) Maximizing the saliency ratio of the synchronous reluctance motor. IEEE Proc Electr Power Appl 140(4):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chabu IE, Silva VC, Cardoso JR, Nabeta SI, Foggia A (1999) A new design technique based on a suitable choice of rotor geometrical parameters to maximize torque and power factor in synchronous reluctance motors: part i—theory. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 14(3):599–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chabu IE, Cardoso JR, Silva VC, Nabeta SI, Foggia A (1999) A new design technique based on a suitable choice of rotor geometrical parameters to maximize torque and power factor in synchronous reluctance motors: part ii—finite element analysis and measurements. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 14(3):605–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krishnan R (2001) Switched reluctance motor drives: modeling, simulation, analysis, design and applications. CRC Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Boldea I (1996) Reluctance synchronous machines and drives. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller TJE (1993) Switched reluctance motors and their control. Magna Physics Publishing and Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kiriyama H, Kawano S, Honda Y, Higaki T, Morimoto S, Takeda Y (1998) High performance synchronous reluctance motor with multi-flux barrier for the appliance industry. In: IEEE industry applications conference, 33rd IAS Annual Meeting, vol 1. IEEE, St. Louis, pp 111–117

  23. Miller TJE (1993) Brushless permanent-magnet and reluctance motor drives. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hendershot JR, Miller TJE (1994) Design of brushless permanent-magnet motors. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burkhart B, Brauer H, De Doncker R (2012) Design of a switched reluctance traction drive for electric vehicles. In: IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference. IEEE, Seoul, pp 204–209

  26. Owatchaiphong S (2013) Automatic design process of switched reluctance motors using genetic algorithms, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Electrical Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok

  27. SPEED consortium, Glasgow, Scotland, [Online] Available: http://www.speed-emachine-design.com. Accessed 10 Jan 2015

  28. CEDRAT company, Meylan Cedex, France, [Online] Available: http://www.cedrat.com. Accessed 10 Jan 2015

  29. Lange T, Kerdsup B, Weiss C, De Doncker R (2014) Torque ripple reduction in reluctance synchronous machines using an asymmetric rotor structure. In: 7th IET international conference on power electronics, machines and drives (PEMD 2014). IET, Manchester, pp 1–5

  30. Fiorillo F, Novikov A (1990) An improved approach to power losses in magnetic laminations under nonsinusoidal induction waveform. IEEE Trans Magn 26(5):2904–2910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shanghai Huaye Iron and Steel Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, [Online]. Available: http://hkhuaye.en.alibaba.com/product/1794440033-221860508/35W330_Silicon_Steel_Coil.html. Accessed 9 July 2015

  32. InvestmentMine, Vancouver, Canada, [Online]. Available: http://www.infomine.com/investment/metal-prices/copper/5-year/. Accessed 9 July 2015

  33. Nasdaq, New York, U.S.A., [Online]. Available: http://www.nasdaq.com/markets/copper.aspx?timeframe=5y. Accessed 9 July 2015

  34. Digikey, Minnesota, U.S.A., [Online]. Available: http://www.digikey.com/product-search/en?KeyWords=A1101EUA-T&WT.z_header=search_go. Accessed 10 July 2015

  35. AMS, Unterpremstaetten, Austria, [Online]. Available: http://ams.com/eng/Products/Position-Sensors/Magnetic-Rotary-Position-Sensors/AS5030. Accessed 10 July 2015

  36. AMS, Unterpremstaetten, Austria, [Online]. Available: http://ams.com/eng/Products/Position-Sensors/Magnetic-Rotary-Position-Sensors/AS5045. Accessed 10 July 2015

  37. Digikey, Minnesota, USA [Online]. Available: http://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/RHRP3060/RHRP3060-ND/1057114. Accessed 10 July 2015

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication is one of the results in an industrial-oriented R&D collaboration with LA E-Ride Co., Ltd. (Thailand).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Sirindhorn International Thai-German Graduate School of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 1518 Pracharat 1 Road, Bangsue, Bangkok, 10800, Thailand

    Burin Kerdsup & Nisai H. Fuengwarodsakul

Authors
  1. Burin Kerdsup
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nisai H. Fuengwarodsakul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burin Kerdsup.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kerdsup, B., Fuengwarodsakul, N.H. Performance and cost comparison of reluctance motors used for electric bicycles. Electr Eng 99, 475–486 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0373-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0373-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation