Skip to main content
Log in

A novel way to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The magnitude of the voltage sag is accepted as one of the most important parameters for its characterization, classification, and the detection. Hence, the selection of most suitable method to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag is a basic requirement of the power quality (PQ) monitoring. This paper first discusses the three different existing methods, namely root mean square (RMS), peak, and fundamental voltage component methods, to determine the magnitude of the voltage sag. Here, these three methods are applied on test waveform, as provided by the PQ event characterization working groups, to assess the various characteristics of the voltage sag. Further, these characteristics have been compared to highlight the shortfalls of method applied. Additionally, an attempt has been made to propose a hybrid method to quantify the magnitude of the voltage sag. The proposed hybrid method is tested on the same test waveform and compared with the three existing methods available to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag. The results of comparisons show that the proposed hybrid concept reduces the overestimation in sag duration at high-threshold voltage and gives precise detection of overshoot just after the event. The effects of sampling frequency and the length of sliding window to determine the magnitude of the voltage sag are also investigated and the results are discussed in terms of depth, duration, and oscillation. Furthermore, the effect of sampling frequency on phase angle jump is discussed and minimum number of samples per cycle and minimum length of window for proper characterization of the voltage sag are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bollen MHJ (2000) Understanding power quality problem: voltage sag and interruption. IEEE Press, New York

  2. Ignatova V, Granjon P, Bacha S (2009) Space vector method for voltage dips and swells analysis. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 24(4):2054–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Polajzer B, Stumberger G, Seme S, Dolinar D (2009) Generalization of methods for voltage-sag source detection using vector-space approach. IEEE Trans Ind App 45(6):2152–2161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Djokic SZ, Milanovic JV, Rowand SM (2007) Advance voltage sag characterization II: point on wave. IET Gen Trans Distrib 1(1): 146–154

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vegunta SC, Milanovic JV (2011) Estimation of cost of downtime of industrial process due to voltage sags. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(2):576–587

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naidoo R, Pillay P (2007) A new method of voltage sag and swell detection. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 22(2):1056–1063

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pedra J, Sainz L, Corcoles F, Guasch L (2005) Symmetrical and unsymmetrical voltage sag effects on three phase transformrs. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(2):1683–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CS, Loh PC (2001) Integration of fault current limiters on power system for voltage quality improvement. Electr Power Syst Res 57(2):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mansor M, Rahim NB (2009) Voltage sag detection-a survey. In: Proceeding of technical postgraduates (TECHPOS), Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–6

  10. Voltage sag indices (2003) Draft 4- working document for IEEE P 1564 and CIGRE WG 35–07

  11. Thallam RS, Heydt GT (2000) Power acceptability and voltage sag indices in three-phase sense. In: Proceeding of IEEE Summer Meeting, Seattle

  12. Zhang L, Bollen MHJ (2000) Characteristic of voltage dips (sags) in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 15(2):827–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Djokic SZ, Milanovic J, Chapman VD, McGranaghan JMF, Kirschen DS (2005) A new method for classification and presentation of voltage reduction events. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(4):2576–2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan JY, Milanovic JV (2007) Severity indices for assessment of equipment sensitivity to voltage sags and short interruptions. Power Engineering Society General Meeting, IEEE, pp 1–7

  15. Hui-Yung C, Hurng-Liahug J, Chieng-Lien H (1992) Transient response of a peak voltage detector for sinusoidal signals. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 39(1):74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tunaboylu NS, Collins ER Jr, Chaney PR (1998) Voltage disturbance evaluation using the missing voltage technique. In: Procceding of international conference on harmonics and quality of power, vol 1:577–582

  17. Hernandez OC, Enjeti PN (2005) A fast detection algorithm suitable for mitigation of numerous power quality disturbances. IEEE Trans Ind App 41(6):1684–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrea F, Andrea M (2004) Voltage sag detection based on rectified voltage processing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(4):1962–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fitzer C, Barnes M, Green P (2004) Voltage sag detection technique for a dynamic voltage restorer. IEEE Trans Ind App 40(1):203–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bae B, Lee J, Jeong J, Han B (2010) Line interactive single phase dynamic volatge restorer with novel sag detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Del 4:2702–2709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma H, Girgis AA (1996) Identification and tracking of harmonic sources in a power system using a Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Power Del 11(3):1659–1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan RL (1999) IEEE power quality event characterization : fault related test wave form Available at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1159/2/index.html

  23. Yong WK, Devaney MJ (1998) Power measurement using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 47(5):1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamid EY, Kawasaki ZI (2001) Wavelet packet transform for RMS value and power measurement. IEEE Power Eng Rev pp 49–51

  25. Won DJ, Ju. Ahn S, Moon S-II, (2005) A modified sag characterisation using voltage tolerance curve for power quality diagnosis. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(4):2638–2643

  26. Herath HMSC, Gosbell VJ, Perera S (2005) Power quality (PQ) survey reporting:discrete disturbance limits. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(2):851–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leborgne RC, Karlsson D (2005) Phasor based voltage sag monitoring and characterization. In:18th international conference on electricity distribution, Turin, 6–9 Jun 2005

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Thakur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thakur, P., Singh, A.K. A novel way to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag. Electr Eng 95, 331–340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0268-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0268-0

Keywords

Navigation