Abstract
The magnitude of the voltage sag is accepted as one of the most important parameters for its characterization, classification, and the detection. Hence, the selection of most suitable method to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag is a basic requirement of the power quality (PQ) monitoring. This paper first discusses the three different existing methods, namely root mean square (RMS), peak, and fundamental voltage component methods, to determine the magnitude of the voltage sag. Here, these three methods are applied on test waveform, as provided by the PQ event characterization working groups, to assess the various characteristics of the voltage sag. Further, these characteristics have been compared to highlight the shortfalls of method applied. Additionally, an attempt has been made to propose a hybrid method to quantify the magnitude of the voltage sag. The proposed hybrid method is tested on the same test waveform and compared with the three existing methods available to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag. The results of comparisons show that the proposed hybrid concept reduces the overestimation in sag duration at high-threshold voltage and gives precise detection of overshoot just after the event. The effects of sampling frequency and the length of sliding window to determine the magnitude of the voltage sag are also investigated and the results are discussed in terms of depth, duration, and oscillation. Furthermore, the effect of sampling frequency on phase angle jump is discussed and minimum number of samples per cycle and minimum length of window for proper characterization of the voltage sag are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bollen MHJ (2000) Understanding power quality problem: voltage sag and interruption. IEEE Press, New York
Ignatova V, Granjon P, Bacha S (2009) Space vector method for voltage dips and swells analysis. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 24(4):2054–2061
Polajzer B, Stumberger G, Seme S, Dolinar D (2009) Generalization of methods for voltage-sag source detection using vector-space approach. IEEE Trans Ind App 45(6):2152–2161
Djokic SZ, Milanovic JV, Rowand SM (2007) Advance voltage sag characterization II: point on wave. IET Gen Trans Distrib 1(1): 146–154
Vegunta SC, Milanovic JV (2011) Estimation of cost of downtime of industrial process due to voltage sags. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 26(2):576–587
Naidoo R, Pillay P (2007) A new method of voltage sag and swell detection. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 22(2):1056–1063
Pedra J, Sainz L, Corcoles F, Guasch L (2005) Symmetrical and unsymmetrical voltage sag effects on three phase transformrs. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(2):1683–1691
Chang CS, Loh PC (2001) Integration of fault current limiters on power system for voltage quality improvement. Electr Power Syst Res 57(2):83–92
Mansor M, Rahim NB (2009) Voltage sag detection-a survey. In: Proceeding of technical postgraduates (TECHPOS), Kuala Lumpur, pp 1–6
Voltage sag indices (2003) Draft 4- working document for IEEE P 1564 and CIGRE WG 35–07
Thallam RS, Heydt GT (2000) Power acceptability and voltage sag indices in three-phase sense. In: Proceeding of IEEE Summer Meeting, Seattle
Zhang L, Bollen MHJ (2000) Characteristic of voltage dips (sags) in power systems. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 15(2):827–832
Djokic SZ, Milanovic J, Chapman VD, McGranaghan JMF, Kirschen DS (2005) A new method for classification and presentation of voltage reduction events. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(4):2576–2584
Chan JY, Milanovic JV (2007) Severity indices for assessment of equipment sensitivity to voltage sags and short interruptions. Power Engineering Society General Meeting, IEEE, pp 1–7
Hui-Yung C, Hurng-Liahug J, Chieng-Lien H (1992) Transient response of a peak voltage detector for sinusoidal signals. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 39(1):74–79
Tunaboylu NS, Collins ER Jr, Chaney PR (1998) Voltage disturbance evaluation using the missing voltage technique. In: Procceding of international conference on harmonics and quality of power, vol 1:577–582
Hernandez OC, Enjeti PN (2005) A fast detection algorithm suitable for mitigation of numerous power quality disturbances. IEEE Trans Ind App 41(6):1684–1690
Andrea F, Andrea M (2004) Voltage sag detection based on rectified voltage processing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 19(4):1962–1967
Fitzer C, Barnes M, Green P (2004) Voltage sag detection technique for a dynamic voltage restorer. IEEE Trans Ind App 40(1):203–212
Bae B, Lee J, Jeong J, Han B (2010) Line interactive single phase dynamic volatge restorer with novel sag detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Del 4:2702–2709
Ma H, Girgis AA (1996) Identification and tracking of harmonic sources in a power system using a Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Power Del 11(3):1659–1665
Morgan RL (1999) IEEE power quality event characterization : fault related test wave form Available at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1159/2/index.html
Yong WK, Devaney MJ (1998) Power measurement using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 47(5):1205–1210
Hamid EY, Kawasaki ZI (2001) Wavelet packet transform for RMS value and power measurement. IEEE Power Eng Rev pp 49–51
Won DJ, Ju. Ahn S, Moon S-II, (2005) A modified sag characterisation using voltage tolerance curve for power quality diagnosis. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(4):2638–2643
Herath HMSC, Gosbell VJ, Perera S (2005) Power quality (PQ) survey reporting:discrete disturbance limits. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 20(2):851–858
Leborgne RC, Karlsson D (2005) Phasor based voltage sag monitoring and characterization. In:18th international conference on electricity distribution, Turin, 6–9 Jun 2005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thakur, P., Singh, A.K. A novel way to quantify the magnitude of voltage sag. Electr Eng 95, 331–340 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0268-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0268-0