Abstract
The Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO) unified power flow controller (UPFC) is installed at the 154 kV Kangjin substation and is operated on the Kangjin–Jangheung transmission line. This UPFC has been operated by the manual set-point control method; however, it is very difficult for the operator to determine the operation point of UPFC in real-time. This paper proposes an automatic supervisory control system for the KEPCO UPFC to overcome the limitations of set-point control and increase the efficiency of UPFC. The functions and configuration of the system are described and the operation scheme that will be applied in the system is presented. In order to validate the proposed algorithm, a prototype program is developed and some simulations are conducted using the data collected from the load dispatch center in the KEPCO system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lehmkoster C (2002) Security constrained optimal power flow for an economic operation of FACTS-devices in liberalized energy markets. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 17(2): 603–608
Hingorani NG, Gyugyi L (1999) Understanding facts. IEEE Press, New Jersey
Choo JB, Chang BH et al (2002) Development of FACTS operation technology to the KEPCO power network—installation and operation. Proc Transm Distrib Conf Exhib 3: 2008–2013
Chang BH, Choo JB, Lima LT, Feltes JW (2003) Dynamic operational strategies of UPFC in the KEPCO transmission system. KIEE Int Trans PE 3(4): 168–175
Tambey N, Kothari ML (2003) Damping of power system oscillations with unified power flow controller (UPFC). IEE Proc Gen Trans Distrib 150(2): 129–140
Fujita H, Akagi H, Watanabe Y (2006) Dynamic control and performance of unified power flow controller for stabilizing and AC transmission system. IEEE Trans Power Elec 21(4): 1013–1020
Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF (1996) Power generation operation, and control, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Farhangfar A, Sajjadi SJ, Afsharnia S (2004) Power flow control and loss minimization with unified power flow controller (UPFC). Can Conf Electr Comput Eng 1: 385–388
Noroozian M, Angquist L, Ghandhari M, Andersson G (1997) Use of UPFC for optimal power flow control. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 12(4): 1629–1634
Lai LL, Ma JT (1996) Power flow control with UPFC using genetic algorithms. In: International conference on intelligent systems applications to power systems, pp 373–377
Son KM, Moon KS, Lee SK, Park JK (2000) Coordination of an SVC with a ULTC reserving compensation margin for emergency control. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 15(4): 1193–1198
Lim JU, Moon SI (2000) UPFC operation for the minimization of power production and delivery costs. IEEE Power Eng Soc Summer Meet 1: 331–335
Lim JU, Moon SI (2002) An operation scheme of UPFC’s considering operating objectives and states. IEEE Power Eng Soc Summer Meet 1: 610–615
Rao SS (1996) Engineering optimization. Wiley, New York
Song SH, Lim JU, Moon SI (2004) Installation and operation of FACTS devices for enhancing steady-state security. Electr Power Syst Res 70: 7–15
Pai MA (1989) Energy function analysis for power system stability. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Acha E, Fuerte-Esquivel CR, Ambriz-Perez H, Angeles-Camacho C (2004) FACTS modeling and simulation in power networks. Wiley, Chichester
Fuerte-Esquivel CR, Acha E, Ambriz-Perez H (2000) A comprehensive Newton–Raphson UPFC model for the quadratic power flow solution of practical power networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1): 102–109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00202-008-0102-x
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, SJ., Lee, DW. & Moon, SI. Structure and operation strategies of an automatic supervisory control system for the KEPCO UPFC. Electr Eng 90, 511–519 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-008-0100-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-008-0100-z