Skip to main content
Log in

The geometry of inductive reasoning in games

  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary.

 This paper contributes to the recent focus on dynamics in noncooperative games when players use inductive learning. The most well-known inductive learning rule, Brown’s fictitious play, is known to converge for games, yet many examples exist where fictitious play reasoning fails to converge to a Nash equilibrium. Building on ideas from chaotic dynamics, this paper develops a geometric conceptualization of instability in games, allowing for a reinterpretation of existing results and suggesting avenues for new results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: October 27, 1995 revised version May 2, 1996

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, D. The geometry of inductive reasoning in games. Economic Theory 10, 185–193 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050153

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990050153

Navigation