Abstract
I study a model of information aggregation in elections with multiple states and multiple signals. I focus on threshold equilibria and completely characterize information aggregation in this class. In particular, I identify conditions on the distributions of signals that are necessary and sufficient for information aggregation in every sequence of threshold equilibria, as well as simple conditions that are sufficient but not necessary for information aggregation in threshold equilibria. I also identify (generic) conditions that are necessary and sufficient for information not to be aggregated in any sequence of threshold equilibria. As a consequence, my analysis provides sufficient conditions for the existence of equilibria that do not aggregate information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya, A.: Information aggregation failure in a model of social mobility. Games Econ. Behav. 100, 257–272 (2016)
Ahn, D.S., Oliveros, S.: The Condorcet Jur(ies) Theorem. J. Econ. Theory 150, 841–851 (2014)
Ahn, D.S., Oliveros, S.: Approval voting and scoring rules with common values. J. Econ. Theory 166, 304–310 (2016)
Ali, S.N., Mihm, M., Siga, L.: Adverse Selection in distributive politics. Manuscript (2018)
Austen-Smith, D., Banks, J.S.: Information aggregation, rationality, and the Condorcet Jury theorem. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 90(1), 34–45 (1996)
Barelli, P., Bhattacharya, S., Siga, L.: Full information equivalence in large elections. Unpublished manuscript (2021). https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Wq5Uzlw7bSaBf_XAlDETn3sd1C739CdK/view
Bhattacharya, S.: Preference monotonicity and information aggregation in elections. Econometrica 81(3), 1229–1247 (2013)
Bouton, L., Castanheira, M.: One person, many votes: divided majority and information aggregation. Econometrica 80(1), 43–87 (2012)
Duggan, J., Martinelli, C.: A Bayesian model of voting in Juries. Games Econ. Behav. 37, 259–294 (2001)
Feddersen, T., Pesendorfer, W.: Voting behavior and information aggregation in elections with private information. Econometrica 65(5), 1029–1058 (1997)
Grofman, B., Owen, G., Feld, S.L.: Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. Theory Decis. 15, 261–278 (1983)
Gul, F., Pesendorfer, W.: Partisan politics and election failure with ignorant voters. J. Econ. Theory 144, 146–174 (2009)
Kim, J., Fey, M.: The swing voter’s curse with adversarial preferences. J. Econ. Theory 135(1), 236–252 (2007)
Mandler, M.: The fragility of information aggregation in large elections. Games Econ. Behav. 74, 257–268 (2012)
McLennan, A.: Consequences of the Condorcet Jury theorem for beneficial information aggregation by rational agents. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 92(2), 413–418 (1998)
Mihm, M., Siga, L.: Information aggregation in competitive markets. Theor. Econ. 16, 161–196 (2021)
Myerson, R.B.: Extended Poisson games and the Condorcet Jury theorem. Games Econ. Behav. 25, 111–131 (1998)
Young, H.P.: Condorcet’s theory of voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 82(4), 1231–1244 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
I am indebted to my adviser, Wolfgang Pesendorfer, for his invaluable guidance and support. I am grateful to Faruk Gul and Germán Gieczewski for very useful discussions and advice. For helpful conversations and comments, I would like to thank Renee Bowen, Ying Chen, Wioletta Dziuda, Benjamin Ogden, Santiago Oliveros, Nicola Persico and Andrea Prat. I also would like to thank the audiences at the 2019 North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society (Seattle, Washington), the 30th International Conference on Game Theory (Stony Brook University, 2019), American Political Science Association Meeting 2019 (Washington, DC), and seminar audiences at Princeton for their comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kosterina, S. Information structures and information aggregation in threshold equilibria in elections. Econ Theory 75, 493–522 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-022-01412-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-022-01412-w