Economic Theory

, Volume 48, Issue 2–3, pp 399–424 | Cite as

Definitions of ambiguous events and the smooth ambiguity model

  • Peter Klibanoff
  • Massimo Marinacci
  • Sujoy Mukerji
Symposium

Abstract

We examine a variety of preference-based definitions of ambiguous events in the context of the smooth ambiguity model. We first consider the definition proposed in Klibanoff et al. (Econometrica 73(6):1849–1892, 2005) based on the classic Ellsberg two-urn paradox (Ellsberg Q J Econ 75:643–669, 1961) and show that it satisfies several desirable properties. We then compare this definition with those of Nehring (Math Soc Sci 38(2):197–213, 1999), Epstein and Zhang (Econometrica 69:265–306, 2001), Zhang (Econ Theory 20:159–181, 2002), and Ghirardato and Marinacci (J Econ Theory 102:251–289, 2002). Within the smooth ambiguity model, we show that Ghirardato and Marinacci (J Econ Theory 102:251–289, 2002) would identify the same set of ambiguous and unambiguous events as our definition while Epstein and Zhang (Econometrica 69:265–306, 2001) and Zhang (Econ Theory 20:159–181, 2002) would yield a different classification. Moreover, we discuss and formally identify two key sources of the differences compared to Epstein and Zhang (Econometrica 69:265–306, 2001) and Zhang (Econ Theory 20:159–181, 2002). The more interesting source is that these two definitions can confound non-constant ambiguity attitude and the ambiguity of an event.

Keywords

Ambiguity Uncertainty Knightian uncertainty Ambiguity aversion Uncertainty aversion Ellsberg paradox 

JEL Classification

D800 D810 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amarante M., Filiz E.: Ambiguous events and maxmin expected utility. J Econ Theory 134(1), 1–33 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billingsley P.: Probability and Measure. 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  3. Cerreia-Vioglio S., Ghirardato P., Maccheroni F., Marinacci M., Siniscalchi M.: Rational preferences under ambiguity. Econ Theory (2011) (this issue)Google Scholar
  4. Ellsberg D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Q J Econ 75, 643–669 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Epstein L.G., Zhang J.: Subjective probabilities on subjectively unambiguous events. Econometrica 69, 265–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilboa I., Schmeidler D.: Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. J Math Econ 18, 141–153 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghirardato P., Marinacci M.: Ambiguity made precise: a comparative foundation. J Econ Theory 102, 251–289 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klibanoff P., Marinacci M., Mukerji S.: A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6), 1849–1892 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kopylov I.: Subjective probabilities on ‘small’ domains. J Econ Theory 133(1), 236–265 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kreps D.: Notes on the Theory of Choice. Westview Press, Boulder and London (1988)Google Scholar
  11. Maccheroni F., Marinacci M., Rustichini A.: Ambiguity aversion, robustness and the variational representation of preferences. Econometrica 74(6), 1447–1498 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Machina M., Schmeidler D.: A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60, 745–780 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nehring K.: Capacities and probabilistic beliefs: a precarious coexistence. Math Soc Sci 38(2), 197–213 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nehring, K.: Is it possible to define subjective probabilities in purely behavioral terms? A comment on Epstein-Zhang (2001). In: Discussion Paper 0067, Economics Working Papers. Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science (2006)Google Scholar
  15. Zhang J.: Qualitative probabilities on λ-systems. Math Soc Sci 38, 11–20 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang J.: Subjective ambiguity, expected utility and choquet expected utility. Econ Theory 20, 159–181 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Klibanoff
    • 1
  • Massimo Marinacci
    • 2
  • Sujoy Mukerji
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Managerial Economics and Decision Sciences, Kellogg School of ManagementNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Decision Sciences and IGIERUniversità BocconiMilanoItaly
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations