Economic Theory

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 353–369 | Cite as

Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales?



The literature on global climate change has largely ignored the small but positive steps that many public and private actors are taking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A global policy is frequently posited as the only strategy needed. It is important to balance the major attention on global solutions as the only strategy for coping with climate change. Positive actions are underway at multiple, smaller scales to start the process of climate change mitigation. Researchers need to understand the strength of polycentric systems where enterprises at multiple levels may complement each other. Building a global regime is a necessity, but encouraging the emergence of a polycentric system starts the process of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and acts as a spur to international regimes to do their part.


Global public goods Climate policy Collective-action theory 

JEL Classification

H4 Q2 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angelsen, A. (eds): Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options. CIFOR, Bogor (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, G.B., Mitra, T., Tungodden, B.: Sustainable recursive social welfare functions. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  3. Baer P., Harte J., Haya B. et al.: Equity and greenhouse gas responsibility. Science 289, 2287 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett S.: Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  5. Van den Botsen W.J.W, Gowdy J.M., Bergh J.C.J.M.: Cumulative CO2 emissions: shifting international responsibilities for climate debt. Clim Policy 8, 569–576 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burniaux, J.-M., Martins, J.O.: Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  7. Chhatre A., Agrawal A.: Forest commons and local enforcement. PNAS 105, 13286–13291 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chichilnisky, G.: Sustainable markets with short sales. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  9. Chichilnisky G., Heal G.: Who should abate carbon emissions? An international viewpoint. Econ Lett 44, 443–449 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chichilnisky G., Heal G.: Environmental Markets: Equity and Efficiency. Columbia University Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  11. Chipman, J.S., Tian, G.: Detrimental externalities, pollution rights, and the ‘Coase theorem’. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  12. Chomitz K.M.: Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare?. Clim Policy 2, 35–49 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. Clark C.W.: The Worldwide Crisis in Fisheries: Economic Models and Human Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Cole D.H.: Climate change and collective action. Curr Legal Probl 61, 229–264 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman E.: Institutional factors affecting ecological outcomes in forest management. J Policy Anal Manag 28, 122–146 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbera E., Brown K.: Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: marketing forest carbon in Mexico. World Dev 36, 1956–1979 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J. et al.: Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7, 21–28 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dellink, R., Dekker, T., den Elzen, M., et al.: Sharing the Burden of Adaptation Financing. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies Newsletter (2009)Google Scholar
  19. den Elzen M.G.J., Schaeffer M., Lucas P.L.: Differentiating future commitments on the basis of countries’ relative historical responsibility for climate change: uncertainties in the ‘Brazilian Proposal’ in the context of a policy implementation. Clim Change 71, 277–301 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dietz T., Gardner G.T., Gilligan J., Stern P.C., Vandenbergh M.P.: Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. PNAS 106, 18452–18456 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dutta, P.K., Radner, R.: Capital growth in a global warming model: will China and India sign a climate treaty? Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  22. Ebeling J.: Risks and criticisms of forestry-based climate change mitigation and carbon trading. In: Streck, C. (eds) Climate Change and Forests: Emerging Policy and Market Opportunities, pp. 43–58. Chatham House, London (2008)Google Scholar
  23. Engel, K.H.: State and local climate change initiatives: what is motivating state and local governments to address a global problem and what does this say about federalism and environmental law? Discussion Paper 06–36. Tucson: University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, Arizona Legal Studies (2006)Google Scholar
  24. European Environmental Agency (EEA).: Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. EEA Report No. 9. ISSN 1725–9177 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. Figuières, C., Tidball, M.: Sustainable exploitation of a natural resource: a satisfying use of Chichilnisky’s criterion. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  26. Finlayson, A.C.: Fishing for Truth: A Sociological Analysis of Northern Cod Stock Assessment from 1977–1990. St. Johns: Memorial University of New Foundland, New Foundland Institute of Social and Economic Research (1994)Google Scholar
  27. Finlayson A.C., McCay B.J.: Crossing the threshold of ecosystem resilience: the commercial extension of northern cod. In: Berkes, F., Folke, C. (eds) Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, pp. 311–338. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  28. Fuller M.C., Portis S.C., Kammen D.M.: Toward a low-carbon economy: municipal financing for energy efficiency and solar power. Environment 51, 22–32 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gershenfeld N., Samouhos S., Nordman B.: Intelligent infrastructure for energy efficiency. Science 327, 1086–1087 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gibson C., Williams J., Ostrom E.: Local enforcement and better forests. World Dev 33, 273–284 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goulder, L.H.: California’s bold new climate policy. The Economists’ Voice 4. (September 2007). Accessed 20 Feb 2009
  32. Hayes T., Ostrom E.: Conserving the world’s forests: are protected areas the only way?. Indiana Law Rev 38, 595–617 (2005)Google Scholar
  33. Hillman T., Ramaswami A.: Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities. Environ Sci Technol 44, 1902–1910 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoffman, M.J., Eidelman, G.: Experimenting with climate governance. In: Paper presented at the Amsterdam Human Dimensions of Environmental Change Meeting, December (2009)Google Scholar
  35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report. London: Cambridge University Press (2007)Google Scholar
  36. Karp, L., Zhang, J.: Taxes versus quantities for a stock pollutant with endogenous abatement costs and asymmetric information. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  37. Kates R.W., Wilbanks T.J.: Making the global local: responding to climate change concerns from the ground up. Environment 45, 12–23 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaufman, L.: A desire to keep up with neighbors is spurring conservation. New York Times. (2009). Accessed 30 Jan 2009
  39. Lauwers, L.: Intergenerational equity, efficiency, and constructability. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  40. Lecocq, F., Hourcade, J.-C.: Unspoken ethical issues in the climate affair: insights from a theoretical analysis of negotiation mandates. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  41. Lohmann L.: Carbon trading, climate justice and the production of ignorance: ten examples. Development 51, 359–365 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matthews H.D., Caldeira K.: Stabilizing climate requires near zero emissions. Geophys Res Lett 35, 1–5 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGinnis, M. (eds): Polycentric Governance and Development: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1999a)Google Scholar
  44. McGinnis, M. (eds): Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1999b)Google Scholar
  45. McGinnis, M. (eds): Polycentric Games and Institutions: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2000)Google Scholar
  46. Michel D.: Foxes, hedgehogs, and greenhouse governance: knowledge, uncertainty, and international policy-making in a warming world. Appl Energy 86, 258–264 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller C.A.: Climate science and the making of a global political order. In: Jasanoff, S. (eds) States of Knowledge: The Coproduction of Science and Social Order, pp. 46–66. Routledge, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  48. Miller P.: Saving energy: it starts at home. Natl Geogr 215, 60–81 (2009)Google Scholar
  49. Mumford G.: Psychology’s ability to curb energy use. Monit Psychol 38, 20–21 (2007)Google Scholar
  50. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J. et al.: Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7, 4–11 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nelson E., Polasky S., Lewis D.J. et al.: Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. PNAS 105, 9471–9476 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newport, F.: Americans’ global warming concerns continue to drop. (11 March 2010). Accessed 15 March 2010
  53. Oppenheimer M., O’Neill B.C., Webster M.: Negative learning. Clim Change 89, 155–172 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ostrom E., Nagendra H.: Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. PNAS 103, 19224–19231 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ostrom E., Parks R.B., Whitaker G.P.: Patterns of Metropolitan Policing. Ballinger , Cambridge, MA (1978)Google Scholar
  56. Ostrom V.: Polycentricity—Part 1. In: McGinnis, M. (eds) Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, pp. 52–74. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1999)Google Scholar
  57. Ostrom V.: The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, 3rd edn. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa (2008a)Google Scholar
  58. Ostrom V.: The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment. 3rd edn. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD (2008b)Google Scholar
  59. Ostrom V., Tiebout C.M., Warren R.: The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. Am Pol Sci Rev 55, 831–842 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Sullivan R.: Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries. In: Streck, C., O’Sullivan, R., Janson-Smith, T., Tarasofsky, R. (eds) Climate Change and Forests: Emerging Policy and Market Opportunities, pp. 179–190. Chatham House, London (2008)Google Scholar
  61. Parks R.B., Ostrom E.: Complex models of urban service systems. In: McGinnis, M. (eds) Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, pp. 355–380. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1999)Google Scholar
  62. Peterson J.E., Shunturov V., Janda K., Platt G., Weinberger K.: Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. Int J Sustain High Educ 8, 16–33 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pope C.A., Ezzati M., Dockery D.W.: Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. New Engl J Med 360, 376–386 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Posner E.A., Sunstein C.: Justice and climate change. Discussion Paper 08-04. Harvard University Project on International Climate Agreements, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  65. Pritchett L., Woolcock M.: Solutions when the solution is the problem: arraying the disarray in development. World Dev 35, 435–461 (2003)Google Scholar
  66. Ramaswami A., Hillman T., Janson B., Reiner M., Thomas G.: A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. Environ Sci Technol 42, 6455–6461 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rezai, A., Foley, D.K., Taylor, L.: Global warming and economic externalities. Econ Theory (2010, this issue)Google Scholar
  68. Sandler T.: Global Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sato, S.: Japan’s solar panel sales rise to record on subsidy. (2010). Accessed 21 April 2010
  70. Schelling, T.C.: Climate change: the uncertainties, the certainties, and what they imply about action. The Economists’ Voice 4. (July 2007). Accessed 20 February 2009
  71. Schreurs M.A.: From the bottom up: local and subnational climate change politics. J Environ Dev 17, 343–355 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schultz P., Nolan J., Cialdini R. et al.: The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci 18, 429–434 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A.: Addressing climate change: global and local. In: Sioshansi, F.P. (ed.) Generating Electricity in a Carbon Constrained World? New York: Elsevier (2009)Google Scholar
  74. Stavins, R.: Policy instruments for climate change: how can national governments address a global problem? University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1997, pp. 293–329. Rethinking Environmental Protection for the 21st Century (1997)Google Scholar
  75. Stern N.: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  76. Streck C., O’Sullivan R., Janson-Smith T., Tarosofsky R.: Climate Change and Forests: Emerging Policy and Market Opportunities. Chatham House, London (2008)Google Scholar
  77. United Nations.: Final Act of the Third Conference on the Law of the Seas. Montenegro Bay, Jamaica: United Nations (1982)Google Scholar
  78. U.S. Conference of Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement.: (2010). Accessed 1 May 2010
  79. Vidal, J.: Pay indigenous people to protect rainforests, conservation groups urge. The Guardian. (17 October 2008). Accessed 23 October 2008
  80. Walters C.J.: Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan, New York (1986)Google Scholar
  81. Wara M.: Is the global carbon market working?. Nature 445, 595–596 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wara, M., Victor, D.G.: A realistic policy on international carbon offsets. Working Paper No. 74. Stanford: Stanford University Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (2008)Google Scholar
  83. Wiener J.B.: Think globally, act globally: the limits of local climate policies. Univ PA Law Rev 155, 1961–1979 (2007)Google Scholar
  84. Williamson O.E.: Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. Free Press, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  85. Williamson O.E.: The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  86. Williamson O.E.: The new institutional economics: take stock, looking ahead. J Econ Lit 38, 593–613 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wilson D.: Predictions about European commons. Common Prop Resour Dig 77, 7–8 (2006)Google Scholar
  88. Wilson J.: Scientific uncertainty, complex systems, and the design of common-pool institutions. In: Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolšak, N., Stern, P., Stonich, S., Weber, E. (eds) National Research Council, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. The Drama of the Commons, pp. 327–359. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Workshop in Political Theory and Policy AnalysisIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Institutional DiversityArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations