This paper explores the relationship between dynamic consistency and existing notions of unambiguous events for Choquet expected utility preferences. A decision maker is faced with an information structure represented by a filtration. We show that the decision maker’s preferences respect dynamic consistency on a fixed filtration if and only if the last stage of the filtration is composed of unambiguous events in the sense of Nehring (Math Social Sci 38:197–213, 1999). Adopting two axioms, conditional certainty equivalence consistency and constrained dynamic consistency to filtration measurable acts, it is shown that the decision maker respects these two axioms on a fixed filtration if and only if the last stage of the filtration is made up of unambiguous events in the sense of Zhang (Econ Theory 20:159–181, 2002).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Camerer C., Weber M.: Recent developments in modelling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. J Risk Uncertain 5, 325–370 (1992)
Chew S., Karni E.: Choquet expected utility with a finite state space: commutativity and act-independence. J Econ Theory 62, 469–479 (1994)
Dempster A.P.: A generalization of Bayesian inference. J R Stat Soc Ser B 30, 205–247 (1968)
Dominiak, A., Dürsch, P., Lefort, J.-P.: A dynamic Ellsberg urn experiment. Discussion Paper, University of Heidelberg (2009)
Eichberger J., Grant S., Kelsey D.: CEU preferences and dynamic consistency. Math Social Sci 49, 143–151 (2005)
Eichberger J., Grant S., Kelsey D.: Updating Choquet beliefs. J Math Econ 43, 888–899 (2007)
Eichberger, J., Grant, S., Lefort, J.-P.: Some properties of neo-additive capacities under updating. Discussion Paper, University of Heidelberg (2009)
Ellsberg D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Q J Econ 75, 643–669 (1961)
Epstein L., Zhang J.: Subjective probabilities on subjectively unambiguous events. Econometrica 69, 265–306 (2001)
Ghirardato P.: Revisiting Savage in a conditional world. Econ Theory 20, 83–92 (2002)
Ghirardato P., Maccheroni F., Marinacci M.: Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude. J Econ Theory 118, 133–173 (2004)
Ghirardato P., Maccheroni F., Marinacci M.: Revealed ambiguity and its consequences: updating. In: Abdellaboui, M., Hey, J.D. (eds) Advances in Decision Making under Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 42, pp. 3–18. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Gilboa I.: Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. J Math Econ 16, 65–88 (1987)
Gilboa I., Schmeidler D.: Maximin expected utility with non-unique prior. J Math Econ 18, 141–153 (1989)
Gilboa I., Schmeidler D.: Updating ambiguous beliefs. J Econ Theory 59, 33–49 (1993)
Hammond H.: Consenquentialist foundations for expected utility. Theory Decis 25, 25–78 (1988)
Jaffray J.: Bayesian updating and belief functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22, 1144–1152 (1992)
Kopylov I.: Subjective probabilities on “small” domains. J Econ Theory 133, 236–265 (2007)
Machina M.: Dynamic consistency and non-expected utility models of choice under uncertainty. J Econ Lit 27, 1622–1668 (1989)
Machina M., Schmeidler D.: A more robust definition of subjective probability. Econometrica 60, 745–780 (1992)
Nakamura Y.: Subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities on finite state space. J Econ Theory 51, 346–366 (1990)
Nehring K.: Capacities and probabilistic beliefs: a precarious coexistence. Math Social Sci 38, 197–213 (1999)
Pires C.P.: A rule for updating ambiguous beliefs. Theory Decis 53, 137–152 (2002)
Sarin R., Wakker P.: A simple axiomatization of nonadditive expected utility. Econometrica 60, 1255–1272 (1992)
Sarin R., Wakker P.: Dynamic choice and nonexpected utility. J Risk Uncertain 17, 87–119 (1998a)
Sarin R., Wakker P.: Revealed likelihood and Knightian uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 16, 223–250 (1998b)
Schmeidler D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 571–587 (1989)
Shafer G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)
Siniscalchi, M.: Dynamic choice under ambiguity. Discussion Papers 1455, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science (2009)
Wakker P.: Continuous subjective expected utility with non-additive probabilities. J Math Econ 18, 1–27 (1989)
Zhang J.: Subjective ambiguity, expected utility and Choquet expected utility. Econ Theory 20, 159–181 (2002)
The authors wish to thank Jürgen Eichberger, Simon Grant, Peter Wakker and an anonymous referee for their valuable comments.
About this article
Cite this article
Dominiak, A., Lefort, JP. Unambiguous events and dynamic Choquet preferences. Econ Theory 46, 401–425 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0512-7
- Choquet expected utility
- Unambiguous events
- Dynamic consistency