Economic Theory

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 73–103 | Cite as

Auction design with opportunity cost

Symposium

Abstract

This paper studies revenue-maximizing auctions in an independent private value setting where potential bidders have known positive opportunity cost of bidding. The main findings are as follows. Firstly, there is no loss of generality in deriving the revenue-maximizing auctions within the class of threshold-entry mechanisms. Secondly, for any given set of entry thresholds, a second-price sealed-bid auction with properly set reserve prices and entry subsidy is revenue-maximizing. Thirdly, a variety of auctions are revenue-maximizing within the symmetric threshold-entry class. Two of them involve no entry subsidy (fee). Fourthly, we identify sufficient conditions under which it is in the seller’s interest to limit the number of potential bidders even if the revenue-maximizing symmetric threshold-entry auction is adopted. Lastly, the revenue-maximizing auction implements asymmetric entry across symmetric bidders in many cases.

Keywords

Auction design Endogenous entry Opportunity cost 

JEL Classification

D44 D82 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1987). On optimal reserve prices in auctions. Manage Sci 33: 763–770 Google Scholar
  2. Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1993). Optimal auction revisited. Games Econ Behav 5: 227–239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Krishna V. (2002). Auction Theory. Academic Press, San Diego Google Scholar
  4. Levin D. and Smith J.L. (1994). Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Am Econ Rev 84: 585–599 Google Scholar
  5. Lu, J.: Endogenous entry and auctions design with private participation costs. Working Paper (2006)Google Scholar
  6. McAfee R.P. and McMillan J. (1987). Auctions with entry. Econ Lett 23: 343–347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McAfee R.P. and McMillan J. (1989). Government procurement and international trade. J Int Econ 26: 291–308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Menezes F.M. and Monteiro P.K. (2000). Auction with endogenous participation. Rev Econ Des 5: 71–89 Google Scholar
  9. Myerson R.B. (1981). Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6: 58–73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Samuelson W.F. (1985). Competitive bidding with entry costs. Econ Lett 17: 53–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Stegeman M. (1996). Participation costs and efficient auctions. J Econ Theory 71: 228–259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tan G. (1992). Entry and R&D in procurement contracting. J Econ Theory 58: 41–60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations