Abstract
This paper studies revenue-maximizing auctions in an independent private value setting where potential bidders have known positive opportunity cost of bidding. The main findings are as follows. Firstly, there is no loss of generality in deriving the revenue-maximizing auctions within the class of threshold-entry mechanisms. Secondly, for any given set of entry thresholds, a second-price sealed-bid auction with properly set reserve prices and entry subsidy is revenue-maximizing. Thirdly, a variety of auctions are revenue-maximizing within the symmetric threshold-entry class. Two of them involve no entry subsidy (fee). Fourthly, we identify sufficient conditions under which it is in the seller’s interest to limit the number of potential bidders even if the revenue-maximizing symmetric threshold-entry auction is adopted. Lastly, the revenue-maximizing auction implements asymmetric entry across symmetric bidders in many cases.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1987). On optimal reserve prices in auctions. Manage Sci 33: 763–770
Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1993). Optimal auction revisited. Games Econ Behav 5: 227–239
Krishna V. (2002). Auction Theory. Academic Press, San Diego
Levin D. and Smith J.L. (1994). Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Am Econ Rev 84: 585–599
Lu, J.: Endogenous entry and auctions design with private participation costs. Working Paper (2006)
McAfee R.P. and McMillan J. (1987). Auctions with entry. Econ Lett 23: 343–347
McAfee R.P. and McMillan J. (1989). Government procurement and international trade. J Int Econ 26: 291–308
Menezes F.M. and Monteiro P.K. (2000). Auction with endogenous participation. Rev Econ Des 5: 71–89
Myerson R.B. (1981). Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6: 58–73
Samuelson W.F. (1985). Competitive bidding with entry costs. Econ Lett 17: 53–57
Stegeman M. (1996). Participation costs and efficient auctions. J Econ Theory 71: 228–259
Tan G. (1992). Entry and R&D in procurement contracting. J Econ Theory 58: 41–60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to Jean-Jacques Laffont for his advice. I thank Isabelle Brocas, Juan Carrillo, Indranil Chakraborty, Jeff Ely, Jinwoo Kim, Vijay Krishna, Preston McAfee, Isabelle Perrigne, Eric Rasmusen, Guofu Tan, Quang Vuong, Joseph Wang for helpful comments and suggestions. Insightful comments and suggestions from the associate editor and two anonymous referees have greatly improved the paper. Earlier versions have been presented at the 2004 International Industrial Organization Conference, the 2005 Pan Pacific Game Theory Conference and the 2007 International Game Theory Conference. All errors are mine. Financial support from National University of Singapore (R-122-000-088-112) is gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, J. Auction design with opportunity cost. Econ Theory 38, 73–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0331-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0331-2