Skip to main content
Log in

Auction design with opportunity cost

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies revenue-maximizing auctions in an independent private value setting where potential bidders have known positive opportunity cost of bidding. The main findings are as follows. Firstly, there is no loss of generality in deriving the revenue-maximizing auctions within the class of threshold-entry mechanisms. Secondly, for any given set of entry thresholds, a second-price sealed-bid auction with properly set reserve prices and entry subsidy is revenue-maximizing. Thirdly, a variety of auctions are revenue-maximizing within the symmetric threshold-entry class. Two of them involve no entry subsidy (fee). Fourthly, we identify sufficient conditions under which it is in the seller’s interest to limit the number of potential bidders even if the revenue-maximizing symmetric threshold-entry auction is adopted. Lastly, the revenue-maximizing auction implements asymmetric entry across symmetric bidders in many cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1987). On optimal reserve prices in auctions. Manage Sci 33: 763–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. (1993). Optimal auction revisited. Games Econ Behav 5: 227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna V. (2002). Auction Theory. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D. and Smith J.L. (1994). Equilibrium in auctions with entry. Am Econ Rev 84: 585–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J.: Endogenous entry and auctions design with private participation costs. Working Paper (2006)

  • McAfee R.P. and McMillan J. (1987). Auctions with entry. Econ Lett 23: 343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee R.P. and McMillan J. (1989). Government procurement and international trade. J Int Econ 26: 291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes F.M. and Monteiro P.K. (2000). Auction with endogenous participation. Rev Econ Des 5: 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson R.B. (1981). Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6: 58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson W.F. (1985). Competitive bidding with entry costs. Econ Lett 17: 53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegeman M. (1996). Participation costs and efficient auctions. J Econ Theory 71: 228–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan G. (1992). Entry and R&D in procurement contracting. J Econ Theory 58: 41–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingfeng Lu.

Additional information

I am grateful to Jean-Jacques Laffont for his advice. I thank Isabelle Brocas, Juan Carrillo, Indranil Chakraborty, Jeff Ely, Jinwoo Kim, Vijay Krishna, Preston McAfee, Isabelle Perrigne, Eric Rasmusen, Guofu Tan, Quang Vuong, Joseph Wang for helpful comments and suggestions. Insightful comments and suggestions from the associate editor and two anonymous referees have greatly improved the paper. Earlier versions have been presented at the 2004 International Industrial Organization Conference, the 2005 Pan Pacific Game Theory Conference and the 2007 International Game Theory Conference. All errors are mine. Financial support from National University of Singapore (R-122-000-088-112) is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, J. Auction design with opportunity cost. Econ Theory 38, 73–103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0331-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-008-0331-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation