Economic Theory

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 517–532 | Cite as

Offshoring and product innovation



We propose an endogenous growth model with offshoring to investigate its effects on product innovation and growth in the country of origin. Offshoring is associated with reduced feedback from offshored plants to domestic labs as well as coordination problems between the offshored and domestic divisions of firms. Production and transport cost parameters affect the static decision to relocate plants but not R&D. Hence, offshoring may be chosen by firms when it damages the growth rate of their countries of origin. In particular, if offshoring reduces the feedback from plants to labs, it is likely to bring dynamic losses when the countries of origin are large, especially in sectors in which R&D is cheap and product differentiation is strong. It is also likely to slow growth in sectors in which contractual incompleteness gives a strong bargaining power to offshored divisions in intra-firm transactions.


Offshoring Innovation Incomplete contracts Growth Spillovers Trade 

JEL Classification

F23 F12 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, J., Jaffe, A.: Bounding the effects of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. Rand J Econ 27, 700–721 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Tirole, J.: Formal and real authority in organizations. J Polit Econ 105, 1–29 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antras, P.: Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Q J Econ 118, 1375–1418 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antras, P.: Incomplete contracts, and the product cycle. Am Econ Rev 95, 1054–1073 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antras, P., Helpman, E.: Global sourcing. J Polit Econ 112, 552–580 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D., Feldman, M.: R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86, 630–640 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. Barba Navaretti, G., Castellani, D., Disdier, A.C.: How does Investing in Cheap Labour Countries Affect Performance at Home? CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5765, France and Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  8. Barba Navaretti, G., Venables, A.: Multinational Firms in the World Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004)Google Scholar
  9. Branstetter, L.: Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. J Int Econ 68, 325–344 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debaere, P., Lee, H., Lee, J.: Does Where you Go Matter? The Impact of Outward Foreign Direct Investment on Multinationals’ Employment at Home. University of Texas, Mimeo (2006)Google Scholar
  11. Eaton, J., Kortum, S.: Technology, trade and growth: a unified framework. Eur Econ Rev 45, 742–755 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eaton, J., Kortum, S.: Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica 70, 1741–1780 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ekholm, K., Hakkala, K.: The Effect of Offshoring on Labour Demand: Evidence from Sweden, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5648 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Feenstra, R., Hanson, G.: Global Production Sharing and Rising Inequality: A Survey of Trade and Wages. In: Choi, K., Harrigan, J.(eds) Handbook of International Trade, Basil Blackwell, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  15. Fuchs, E., Kirchain, R.: Changing paths: the impact of manufacturing offshore on technology development incentives in the optoelectronics industry. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, MIT (2005)Google Scholar
  16. Grossman, G., Helpman, E.: Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  17. Grossman, G., Helpman, E.: Integration vs. outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Q J Econ 117, 85–120 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossman, G., Helpman, E.: Outsourcing versus FDI in industry equilibrium. J Eur Econ Assoc 1, 317–327 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman, G., Helpman, E.: Outsourcing in a global economy. Rev Econ Stud 72, 135–159 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, M.: Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ Sci 13, 232–248 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hart, O., Moore, J.: On the design of hierarchies: coordination versus specialization. J Polit Econ 113(4), 675–702 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helpman, E.: Trade, FDI, and the organization of firms. J Econ Lit 44, 589–630 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hijzen, A., Jean, S., Mayer, T.: The Effects at Home of Initiating Production Abroad: Evidence from Matched French Firms, CEPII, Mimeo (2006)Google Scholar
  24. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R.: Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108, 577–598 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones, C.: R&D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103, 759–784 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimmerling, L., Dal Negro, L., Saini, S., Yi, Y., Ahn, D., Akiyama, S., Cannon, D., Liu, J., Sandland, J., Sparachin, D., Michel, J., Wada, K., Watts, M.: Monolithic Silicon Microphotonics. In: Lockwood, D.J., Pavesi, L.(eds) Silicon Photonics, Springer, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  27. Love, J.H., Roper, S.: The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects. Rev Ind Organ 15, 43–64 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marin, D., Verdier, T.: Globalization and the ‘New Enterprise’. J Eur Econ Assoc 1, 337–344 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markusen, J.: Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  30. Naghavi, A., Ottaviano, G.: Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5925 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. Rodrigues-Clare, A.: Offshoring in a Ricardian World. NBER Working Paper No. 13203 (2007)Google Scholar
  32. Strauss-Kahn, V.: The role of globalization in the within-industry shift away from unskilled workers in France. In: Baldwin, R.E., Winters, L.A.(eds) Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics, NBER Conference Report, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2004)Google Scholar
  33. Young, A.: Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade. Q J Econ 106, 369–405 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Young, A.: Invention and bounded learning by doing. J Polit Econ 101, 443–472 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zander, U., Kogut, B.: Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities—an empirical test. Organ Sci 6, 76–92 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Economia PoliticaUniversità di Modena e Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly
  2. 2.FEEM and CEPRUniversità di Bologna, DSEBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations