Skip to main content
Log in

Deregulation with consensus

  • Symposium
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze the problem of eliminating an inefficient regulation, such as protection, in a dynamic model in which there is incomplete information and unanimous approval from all parties involved is necessary. Existing firms have heterogeneous cost, and efficiency requires some of them to shut down when the inefficient regulation is eliminated. The government can set up a revelation mechanism, giving subsidies and requiring firms to exit the market at a given time depending on the information collected. Under full commitment the optimal policy prescribes that some inefficient firms remain active and are subsidized. The optimal policy takes a simple form, with at most two times at which the firms are allowed to exit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ausubel L., Deneckere R. (1989) Reputation in bargaining and durable goods monopoly. Econometrica 57, 511–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase R. (1972) Durability and monopoly. J Law Econ 15, 143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C., Matusz, S.: Trade liberalization and compensation. Int Econ Rev (forthcoming) (2006)

  • Davidson C., Matusz S., Nelson D. (2006) Can Compensation Save Free Trade?. mimeo, Michigan State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripont M., Roland G. (1992) Economic reform and dynamic political constraints. Rev Econ Stud 59, 703–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez R., Rodrik D. (1989) Resistance to reform: status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. Am Econ Rev 81, 1146–1155

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul F., Sonnenschein H., Wilson R. (1986) Foundations of dynamic monopoly and the coase conjecture. J Econ Theory 39, 155–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydland F., Prescott E. (1977) Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans. J Polit Econ 85, 473–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger D. (1984) Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Menlo Park, Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M., Moro A. (2006) Persistent distortionary policies with asymmetric information. Am Econ Rev 96, 387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson R. (1981) Optimal auction design. Math Oper Res 6, 58–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson W. (1984) Bargaining under incomplete information. Econometrica 52, 995–1005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seierstad A., Sydsæter K. (1987) Optimal Control Theory with Economic Applications. Amsterdam, North Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokey N. (1979) Intertemporal price discrimination. Q J Econ 93, 355–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokey N. (1982) Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell J Econ 12, 112–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topkis D. (1978) Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper Res 26, 305–321

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Brusco.

Additional information

We are very grateful to Matt Mitchell whose comments substantially improved the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brusco, S., Hopenhayn, H. Deregulation with consensus. Economic Theory 32, 223–250 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0221-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-007-0221-z

Keywords

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation