Skip to main content
Log in

Externalities, monopoly and the objective function of the firm

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a theory of general equilibrium with externalities and/or monopoly. We assume that the firm’s decisions are based on the preferences of shareholders and/or other stakeholders. Under these assumptions a firm will produce fewer negative externalities than the comparable profit maximising firm. In the absence of externalities, equilibrium with a monopoly will be Pareto efficient if the firm can price discriminate. The equilibrium can be implemented by a two-part tariff

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen F., Gale D. (2000). Corporate governance and competition. In: Vives X (eds). Corporate governance. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 23–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm V. (1994). The foundations of the theory of monopolistic competition revisited. J Econ Theory 63:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton P., Xu C. Ownership and managerial competition: employee, customer or outside ownership. Working paper, Princeton University (1999)

  • Conley J., Wooders M. (2001). Tiebout economies with differential genetic types and endogenously chosen crowding characteristics. J Econ Theory 98:261–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornes R., Sandler T. (1996). The theory of externalities, public goods and club goods, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall R. (1977). The concept of general equilibrium in a market economy with imperfectly competitive producers. Metroeconomica 29:55–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A., Norman V. (1980). Theory of international trade. CUP, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlin A., Epelbaum M., Heller W. (1998). Is perfect price discrimination really efficient? Welfare and existence in general equilibrium. Econometrica 66:897–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson B. (1993). Competitive equilibrium: theory and applications. CUP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson B., Grodal B., Scotchmer S., Zame W. (1999). Clubs and the market. Econometrica 67:1185–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell J. (1985). Owner-consumers and efficiency. Econ Lett 19:303–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart O.D. (1975). On the optimality of equilibrium when the market structure is incomplete. J Econ Theory 11:418–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O., Moore J. (1990). Property rights and the nature of the firm. J Polit Econ 98:1119–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart O., Moore J. (1996). The governance of exchanges: members’ cooperatives versus outside ownership. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 12:53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom B. (1999). The firm as a subeconomy. J Law Econ Organ 15:74–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M., Meckling W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3:305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D., Milne F. (1996). The existence of equilibrium in incomplete markets and the objective function of the firm. J Math Econ 25:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey D., Milne F.: Imperfect competition and corporate governance. University of Birmingham Discussion paper 03-01 (2003)

  • Laffont J.J. (1988). Fundamentals of public economics. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1990). Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrica 58:1255–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom P., Shannon C. (1994). Monotone comparative statics. Econometrica 62:157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne F. Corporate investment and finance theory in general equilibrium. Econ Rec 511–533 (1974)

  • Milne F. (1981). The firm’s objective function as a collective choice problem. Public Choice 37:473–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne F., Shefrin H. (1987). Information and securities: a note on Pareto dominance and the second best. J Econ Theory 43:314–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott, E., Townsend, R.: Firms as clubs in Walrasian markets with private information. Working paper (2000)

  • Renstrom T., Yalcin E. (2003). Endogenous firm objectives. J Publ Econ Theory 5:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., Steen, E.V.: Shareholder interests, human capital investment and corporate governance. Working paper Stanford Business School (2000)

  • Roemer J.E. (1993). Would economic democracy decrease the amount of public bads?. Scand J Econ 95:227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1973). The concept of efficiency. In: Parkin M., Nobay R (eds). Contemporary issues in economics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 196–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A.K. (1977). Social choice theory: a re-examination. Econometrica 45:217–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer W., Sonnenschein H. (1975). Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences. J Math Econ 2:345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. J Finance 52:33–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole J. (2001). Corporate governance. Econometrica 69:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kelsey.

Additional information

We would like to thank John Fender, Herakles Polemarchakis, Les Reinhorn, John Roberts, John Roemer, Colin Rowat, Erkan Yalcin two anonymous referees and participants in seminars at the Universities of Birmingham, Durham, Heidelberg, Mannheim and Queens, the Public Economic Theory conference at the University of Warwick, July 2000, and the EEA congress, Lausanne 2001 for comments and suggestions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kelsey, D., Milne, F. Externalities, monopoly and the objective function of the firm. Economic Theory 29, 565–589 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0036-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-005-0036-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation